2025 Net Change Limit Extension
220 DReps voted · 65 with a rationale
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes 403.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 388.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 377.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 365.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 341.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 328.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 321.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 314.4K ₳ Rationale
This Info Action does not increase spending; it simply ensures business continuity and compliance with the Cardano Constitution. Therefore, I vote yes!
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
This Info Action does not increase spending; it simply ensures business continuity and compliance with the Cardano Constitution. Therefore, I vote yes!
- Yes 313.1K ₳ Rationale
YES vote on the 2025 NCL Extension. Rationale: To protect continuity in the governance system and prevent a constitutional committee "no" vote.
This action doesn’t change the Net Change Limit, raise the cap, or replace the existing NCL.
It just extends the time window by 8 epochs so that Treasury Withdrawal Actions can still be lawfully enacted under Article IV.Without this extension, the current NCL expires before key actions, including the Critical Infrastructure action, can be enacted. Even if DReps overwhelmingly support those actions, they would almost certainly be deemed unconstitutional at enactment because the NCL window would have closed therefore i deem this action to be necessary.
- Yes 298.6K ₳ Rationale
Thanks to the good dog HOSKY for noticing this. I see no issue with this proposal. This proposal is also important to ensure the Critical Integrations budget and withdrawal can proceed without issue. I am voting in favour of this proposal.
- Yes 271.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 261.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 260K ₳ Rationale
Extending the 2025 Net Change Limit (₳350M) for 8 more epochs ensures smooth Treasury operations.
Administrative measure, no extra spending, fully aligned with Cardano Constitution. - Yes 258.6K ₳ Rationale
[EN] approve the 2025 NCL extension as it keeps the 350M ADA spending cap unchanged. It's just a minor 8-epoch time shift to fit open governance actions and prevent disruptions—given the CC seat reelection and recess period. Not extending could lead to greater downsides.
[PT]Aprovo a extensão do NCL 2025, pois mantém o teto de 350M ADA intacto. É apenas um ajuste temporal de 8 epochs para alinhar ações de governança abertas, evitando disrupções – especialmente com a reeleição de um assento no CC e o recesso atual. Não estender traria mais riscos.
- Yes 252.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 245K ₳ No rationale
- No 238.2K ₳ Rationale
Vote: NO
Why:
The NCL extension just gives the 70 M request by the founding entities more breathing room. It doesn’t fix the missing breakdown, the founding entities’ track‑record, or the confidentiality clauses that hide how the money will actually be spent. In fact, a longer window makes it easier for a shaky proposal to slip through, so I see it as a net‑negative for the 70 M plan.Extending the deadline only prolongs the risk of a poorly justified withdrawal. If the treasury can’t commit to a transparent, well‑justified spend, giving it more time isn’t a good trade‑off.
- Yes 237.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 234.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 215.5K ₳ Rationale
I’m voting YES because keeping the net change limit in place is simply a safety measure. It protects the system from sudden or unnecessary constitutional changes while governance continues to mature. There’s no downside to extending this safeguard, and it keeps things stable.
- Yes 208.6K ₳ Rationale
I vote yes with the following understanding:
- Maintains continuity in treasury operations without increasing the overall spending cap—all prior withdrawals continue to count against the original 350M ADA limit.
- Preserves the community-agreed guardrails under Article IV of the Cardano Constitution, ensuring fiscal responsibility and sustainability.
- Provides a brief bridge period while the community prepares and socializes a new Net Change Limit for 2026, avoiding any unnecessary governance vacuum.
- Yes 190.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 182K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 180.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 177.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 174.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 166.4K ₳ Rationale
8 more epochs.
- Yes 137.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 131.6K ₳ Rationale
Proposal Well align.
- Yes 120.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 115.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 111.7K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 89.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 66.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 64.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 61.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 61.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 60.4K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 60.1K ₳ No rationale
- No 58.6K ₳ No rationale
- No 55.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 53K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 51.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 49.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 48.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 48.4K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 45.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 41.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 39.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 31.9K ₳ No rationale