Withdraw ₳2,162,096 for Midgard - Optimistic Rollups administered by Intersect
190 DReps voted · 48 with a rationale
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes 11M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 10.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 8.8M ₳ Rationale
「275M ADA Administered by Intersect」に含まれるすべての個別提案に対して、エクレシア投票の段階では必ずしもすべてに賛成していたわけではありませんが、最終的には本ガバナンスアクションに賛成票を投じました。Cardanoエコシステム全体への貢献を高く評価し、その前進を後押しする立場から、今回提出された39件すべての提案に賛成票を投じる判断をいたしました。\n\nWhile I did not necessarily support every individual proposal included in "275M ADA Administered by Intersect" during the Ekklesia vote, I ultimately voted Yes on this governance action. Recognizing its overall contribution to the Cardano ecosystem and in support of continued progress, I cast a Yes vote on all 39 proposals submitted under this initiative.
- Yes 8.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 7.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 7.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 7.1M ₳ Rationale
I have voted YES for this proposal in the Ekklesia temperature check and confirm that vote here.
I will keep the rationale brief for expediency - as 38 proposals were submitted concurrently by Intersect today.
Midgard should allow the building of true L2 rollups that inherit full security from Cardano. The proposing team has contributed massively to Cardano so far. This is an important proposal to improve one of the current bottlenecks of Cardano. Direct funding from the treasury seems appropriate for a proposal of this format.
- Yes 6.2M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 6M ₳ Rationale
Voting decision was made to be consistent with my reconciliation back in May 2025;
https://2025budget.intersectmbo.org/voters/drep1yfdfs28uwafjgmrkatdektlzrvha2cmvqjhuz700e04mawq23rmrgReady to move forward overall with the budgeting process and look forward to a smoother process next year. I voted for a lower NCL overall (200M), however found in supporting things that we really ought to have funded to keep momentum in development and enhancements on-chain (supporting both open and non-open-sourced projects) I came a bit higher than that (250M+).
We will need to strike a balance in treasury withdrawels for projects that push development forward (and therefore the chains efficiency, performance, resiliancy, and security) -- and businsess that wish to participate, of any size, and extend the capabilities and real-world use cases of Cardano.
My votes, I hope, align with my overall goal as a DRep to see continuous improvement in the ecosystem. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Tarrant64/mr_cata_gov/refs/heads/main/mr_cata_gov%20.txt
- Yes 5.5M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 5.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 5.3M ₳ Rationale
Midgard’s proposal directly aligns with STORM Partners’ objective to make Cardano more efficient and strengthen its technical capabilities. We consider Midgard a cornerstone project for realizing the scaling ambitions of the Basho era. It is poised to demonstrate the unique advantages of Cardano's eUTxO model for rollups, representing the ecosystem's best opportunity for a truly native Layer 2 solution. The team is highly capable and committed to Cardano's success, and we believe the proposed budget is entirely reasonable for the immense value it will deliver.
- Yes 4.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.6M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.6M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.5M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.2M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 4.2M ₳ Rationale
I'm voting yes, as per list described in my tweet:
https://x.com/OracleAltcoin/status/1917257059071934483Core engineering first, decentralization of influence and conservative with the treasury.
Strength and honor. - Yes 4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 3.7M ₳ Rationale
Midgard is an essential piece for L2s, higher throughput and advanced decentralized applications
- Yes 3.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.8M ₳ Rationale
I am following through with my YES vote from the Cardano Budget 2025 Ekklesia process. This proposal falls within my personal NCL of 250,000,000 ADA.
- Yes 2.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.7M ₳ Rationale
A couple of months ago, I supported the resolution to bundle all of the Intersect Budget Proposals into 1 or 2 formal on-chain governance votes.
Each of these proposals has already received 50% or greater support from the active DReps in the ecosystem, and I will honor that prior decision.
A couple of months ago, I supported the resolution to bundle all of the Intersect Budget Proposals into 1 or 2 formal on-chain governance votes.
Each of these proposals has already undergone extensive scrutiny and received 50% or greater support from the active DReps in the ecosystem, and I will honor that prior decision and the work these prospective developers have put in by voting yes on all the proposals from the Intersect Budget team.
- Abstain 2.6M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.5M ₳ Rationale
I interpret the budget info action proposals as an entangled whole and I do not want to break it. That's why I vote in favor.
- Yes 2.5M ₳ Rationale
Optimistic rollups and ZK rollups are both important for our technology to be as robust as our competitors and at this point it makes sense to invest in both.
- Yes 2.5M ₳ Rationale
Midgardは、UTxOモデルを活かしたCardano独自のロールアップ設計を追求する先進的提案であり、HydraやPartnerchainとは補完的に機能するレイヤー2ソリューションです。トークンレス設計、ADA決済維持、L1帰属収益構造の工夫も評価でき、低予算で高い技術的意義があるため賛成します。
Midgard proposes a UTxO-native optimistic rollup framework that complements Hydra and partnerchains, aiming to enhance scalability while preserving ADA-based fee payments and on-chain economic alignment. Its tokenless, L1-rooted design and efficient budget make this a high-leverage investment. I vote in favor.
- Yes 2.5M ₳ Rationale
The Midgard team hosts some of the top development talent on Cardano. Ask seems within reason based on outputs. I trust this team to deliver.
- Yes 2.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 2M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.9M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.9M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.6M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.5M ₳ Rationale
This proposal should proceed for its innovative EUTxO rollups. It might bring a great improvement in Cardano's On-chain transaction efficiency
- Yes 1.5M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 1.4M ₳ No rationale