Withdraw ₳300,000 for Ledger App Rewrite administered by Intersect
174 DReps voted · 52 with a rationale
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes 1.1M ₳ No rationale
- No 1M ₳ Rationale
This proposal to rewrite the Ledger Cardano app UI is a narrow, incremental fix that duplicates effort already covered by a broader Ledger integration governance action I support. It lacks strategic cohesion and efficient use of ₳300,000 treasury funds. For prudent, unified progress, I vote No—we must consolidate and fund this work within the existing comprehensive Ledger proposal.
- Yes 1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 955.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 947.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 922.9K ₳ No rationale
- Abstain 860.4K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 819K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 818K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 810K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 793K ₳ Rationale
I'd say use Catalyst, but think this is very important.
- Yes 791.4K ₳ Rationale
Ledger is probably the most widely used hardware wallet, and ironically one with the most needs of updating. Adding compatibility with the Ledger testing suite is a pathway to future updates as well as near immediate UI optimizations, all of which have been desired for some time.
- Yes 785.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 762.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 733.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 717.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 716.6K ₳ Rationale
We, The Dutch Drep, vote Yes on this withdrawal governance action for Scalus - DApps Development Platform administered by Intersect. Scala is a popular functional and object-oriented language with proven capabilities, and Scalus offers a comprehensive, practical approach that could lower barriers for developers by enabling them to use Scala across the entire Cardano stack. However, we have questions about the project’s unknown aspects, its adoption, and why developers would choose it over existing alternatives, which warrant further clarification.
- Yes 654.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 624.8K ₳ Rationale
I have voted in favor of this action to demonstrates my intention to execute without delays and move the treasury expenditure process forward. I also want to note that I will not seriously consider individual requests from the treasury for less that 1,500,000 ADA moving forward. I reserve the right this round because I feel the process was not properly explained to proposers and DRep and it would be unfair to implement this personal guardrail at this time. Requests below that threshold are better suited for Catalyst funding or bundled together in MBO, DAO, or conglomerate entities. TWA (Treasury Withdrawal Actions) need be comprehensive and not ad hoc as that makes oversight more costly and inefficient.
A budget and all included line items has already been approved, and now is the time to disperse funding and enable further development of the Cardano network. The proposal was selected through a well-defined process, and I will fully support it out of respect for the will of the broader Cardano community and a belief in respecting the consensus we achieved together under the Intersect-administered budget process. The process reflects a coordinated, strategic approach to funding Cardano’s ecosystem-critical infrastructure. The community has thoroughly reviewed the proposal. I was actively involved in the entire process and the proposal presented represents development that provides a tangible benefit to our ecosystem. It would be a mistake to underfund our ecosystem’s development when we can sustainably provide the required funding with our available treasury reserves.
Furthermore there are exceptional oversight mechanisms in place to ensure a minimum amount of wast, fraud, and abuse of treasury expenditures, such as Intersect’s smart contract framework (audited by TxPipe and MLabs), Multi-party oversight (including Cardano Foundation, Sundae Labs, NMKR, etc.), A clear milestone-driven disbursement model, and full transparency via TRSC/PSSC dashboards.
These governance and assurance systems meet the constitutional standards for accountability and risk management and provide confidence in efficiency and execution. - Yes 589.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 473.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 466.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 445.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 443.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 431.4K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 385.6K ₳ Rationale
Krypto Labs have taken part in the budget debates and agree with proposer that this is something the Cardano blockchain ecosystem need.
I started with making a rationale and arguement for each proposal, but to save time i need to do bulk voting to speed this prosess up. - Yes 382.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 377.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 371.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 328.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 314.4K ₳ Rationale
In alignment with my voting on the 2025 Cardano Budget Reconciliation process through Ekklesia platform, I support this withdrawal and therefore vote YES.
In alignment with my voting on the 2025 Cardano Budget Reconciliation process through Ekklesia platform, I support this withdrawal and therefore vote YES.
- Yes 298.6K ₳ Rationale
I'm defaulting to voting yes because there is some degree of consensus already achieved on each of these. So unless I have a significant issue with one of these proposals I will be voting yes on it.
- Yes 271.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 262.3K ₳ No rationale
- Abstain 258.6K ₳ Rationale
This vote was submitted based on a completed checklist. A detailed rationale is available at:
👉 https://github.com/Agora-Cardano - Yes 257K ₳ Rationale
I vote YES on the Ledger App Rewrite Treasury Withdrawal.
This proposal tackles a longstanding usability and testing challenge in the Cardano Ledger App by redesigning the UI to conform with embedded app standards, improving user experience and maintainability. Vacuumlabs brings proven expertise within the Cardano ecosystem, demonstrated through their prior work on wallets and DEX platforms. The proposal outlines clear off-chain contract management with milestone-based deliverables, supported by third-party auditing and transparent on-chain budget tracking via treasury smart contracts. At ₳300,000, the funding is prudent and aligned with the scope, ensuring a vital infrastructure upgrade benefiting many Cardano users. Supporting this proposal advances ecosystem sustainability and developer tooling excellence.
- Yes 252.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 245K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 238.6K ₳ No rationale
- No 208.6K ₳ Rationale
While I strongly support improving Cardano’s ecosystem and recognize the need for a better Ledger App user experience, I have concerns about using public treasury funds to support a project tied to Ledger, a private company. The Cardano treasury should prioritize initiatives that avoid subsidizing private entities unless there’s clear evidence of shared financial responsibility. Without transparency on Ledger’s contribution (e.g., co-funding or technical support), this proposal risks placing an undue burden on Cardano’s community resources.That said, I commend Vacuumlabs for their stellar track record in the Cardano ecosystem. Their work on AdaLite, Yoroi, WingRiders, and hardware wallet integrations demonstrates their expertise and commitment to Cardano’s success. My NAY vote is not a reflection on Vacuumlabs’ capabilities but a call for greater accountability from private-sector partners like Ledger. I encourage the community to seek clarity on Ledger’s role and resubmit this proposal with a more balanced funding model.
- Yes 206.4K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 190.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 184.4K ₳ Rationale
I am voting yes on all 39 Intersect Governance actions. The community has thoroughly reviewed the many proposals presented in the Intersect Budget Process for the 2025 budget. I was deeply involved in the entire process as an SME for the Budget Committee, and then as the Secretary for the Budget Committee.
The proposals presented represent an incredible amount of development for our ecosystem for the next year. The teams all received at least 50% on Ekklesia polling. The teams will face milestones in order to continue to receive funding. If a team fails to deliver, the process will stop them from enriching themselves without returning value.
If anything, we are spending too little on our community. We need to spend more to further develop our governance and our organized events. This is a liquid democracy. If you believe that all of these proposals deserve a chance to deliver, you can shift your delegation to my DRep ID.
- Yes 180.9K ₳ No rationale
- No 177.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 143.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 137.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 131.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 111.7K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 103K ₳ No rationale