Withdraw ₳600,000 for Complete Web3 developer stack to make Cardano the smart...
166 DReps voted · 47 with a rationale
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes 947.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 922.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 819K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 810K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 793K ₳ Rationale
High value proposition
- Yes 785.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 765.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 733.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 717.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 716.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 655K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 654.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 624.8K ₳ Rationale
I have voted in favor of this action to demonstrates my intention to execute without delays and move the treasury expenditure process forward. I also want to note that I will not seriously consider individual requests from the treasury for less that 1,500,000 ADA moving forward. I reserve the right this round because I feel the process was not properly explained to proposers and DRep and it would be unfair to implement this personal guardrail at this time. Requests below that threshold are better suited for Catalyst funding or bundled together in MBO, DAO, or conglomerate entities. TWA (Treasury Withdrawal Actions) need be comprehensive and not ad hoc as that makes oversight more costly and inefficient.
A budget and all included line items has already been approved, and now is the time to disperse funding and enable further development of the Cardano network. The proposal was selected through a well-defined process, and I will fully support it out of respect for the will of the broader Cardano community and a belief in respecting the consensus we achieved together under the Intersect-administered budget process. The process reflects a coordinated, strategic approach to funding Cardano’s ecosystem-critical infrastructure. The community has thoroughly reviewed the proposal. I was actively involved in the entire process and the proposal presented represents development that provides a tangible benefit to our ecosystem. It would be a mistake to underfund our ecosystem’s development when we can sustainably provide the required funding with our available treasury reserves.
Furthermore there are exceptional oversight mechanisms in place to ensure a minimum amount of wast, fraud, and abuse of treasury expenditures, such as Intersect’s smart contract framework (audited by TxPipe and MLabs), Multi-party oversight (including Cardano Foundation, Sundae Labs, NMKR, etc.), A clear milestone-driven disbursement model, and full transparency via TRSC/PSSC dashboards.
These governance and assurance systems meet the constitutional standards for accountability and risk management and provide confidence in efficiency and execution. - Yes 589.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 473.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 466.2K ₳ No rationale
- No 445.1K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 443.5K ₳ No rationale
- No 382.6K ₳ No rationale
- No 377.3K ₳ No rationale
- No 371.8K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 328.9K ₳ No rationale
- No 323.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 314.4K ₳ Rationale
In alignment with my voting during the 2025 Cardano Budget Reconciliation process on the Ekklesia platform, I support this withdrawal and therefore vote YES.
In alignment with my voting during the 2025 Cardano Budget Reconciliation process on the Ekklesia platform, I support this withdrawal and therefore vote YES.
- Yes 298.6K ₳ Rationale
I'm defaulting to voting yes because there is some degree of consensus already achieved on each of these. So unless I have a significant issue with one of these proposals I will be voting yes on it.
- Yes 271.5K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 262.3K ₳ No rationale
- Abstain 258.6K ₳ Rationale
This vote was submitted based on a completed checklist. A detailed rationale is available at:
👉 https://github.com/Agora-Cardano - Yes 257K ₳ Rationale
I vote YES on the Maestro Treasury Withdrawal proposal to fund the development of a comprehensive Web3 developer stack dedicated to positioning Cardano as the smart contract and DeFi layer for Bitcoin.
This strategic project addresses a critical ecosystem need by enabling Cardano to tap into Bitcoin’s considerable liquidity and user base through robust infrastructure including blockchain indexing, mempool monitoring, event notifications, and wallet management. Maestro demonstrates strong capability with an established track record delivering infrastructure for key Cardano projects and integrations. The proposal includes clear legal contract frameworks with milestone-based deliverables, backed by 3rd party assurance, governed transparently via treasury management smart contracts.
The requested ₳600,000 budget is well justified relative to the project's scope and impact, employing rigorous audit and oversight processes.
Supporting Maestro will substantially enhance Cardano’s smart contract ecosystem, developer experience, and overall ecosystem growth.
- Yes 252.6K ₳ No rationale
- No 245K ₳ No rationale
- No 238.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 208.6K ₳ Rationale
Maestro’s technical capabilities are well-suited to deliver the proposed Bitcoin-Cardano integration. Their expertise in UTXO blockchains, proven Bitcoin DeFi infrastructure (e.g., ICP indexer, Saturn DEX), and extensive Cardano contributions (e.g., DEX aggregator, ISPO Marketplace) demonstrate their ability to execute the proposal’s objectives. Their enterprise-grade tools, strategic partnerships, and open-source commitment ensure reliability and scalability. The governance structure via Intersect, with audited smart contracts and third-party oversight, further mitigates risks.Based on this evidence, Maestro is technically capable of developing the proposed infrastructure, justifying a “yay” vote.
- Yes 206.4K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 190.2K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 184.4K ₳ Rationale
I am voting yes on all 39 Intersect Governance actions. The community has thoroughly reviewed the many proposals presented in the Intersect Budget Process for the 2025 budget. I was deeply involved in the entire process as an SME for the Budget Committee, and then as the Secretary for the Budget Committee.
The proposals presented represent an incredible amount of development for our ecosystem for the next year. The teams all received at least 50% on Ekklesia polling. The teams will face milestones in order to continue to receive funding. If a team fails to deliver, the process will stop them from enriching themselves without returning value.
If anything, we are spending too little on our community. We need to spend more to further develop our governance and our organized events. This is a liquid democracy. If you believe that all of these proposals deserve a chance to deliver, you can shift your delegation to my DRep ID.
- Yes 180.9K ₳ No rationale
- No 177.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 143.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 137.3K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 131.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 111.7K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 103K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 88.7K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 64.7K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 61.9K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 61.8K ₳ No rationale
- No 59.6K ₳ No rationale
- Yes 58.6K ₳ No rationale
- No 55.9K ₳ No rationale