{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"comment":"CIP100:comment"}}},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256","body":{"comment":"This is the third or fourth time I have assessed the same 100K ADA loss. The destination is legitimate, the original deposit is unrecoverable through the normal protocol path, and the loss resulted from an early node defect involving an unregistered stake key. Cardano’s governance design treats the deposit as refundable once an action leaves the live state. **The submitter should not be sentenced indefinitely for the protocol’s childhood mistakes.**\n\n**I remain unconvinced by the additional 3K ADA.** Staking rewards vary, yet the proposal applies a tidy 2% annual assumption to funds that were never available for delegation. Compensating opportunity cost would create a precedent future claimants will quote with admirable persistence.\n\nThe choice is approving a modestly inflated reimbursement or prolonging a dispute whose governance cost already exceeds the disputed 3K ADA.\n\n**Cardano should repay the deposit, record the exception, and stop convening parliament over a rounding error.**"}}