{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"comment":"CIP100:comment"}}},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256","body":{"comment":"dOSPO/OMF:  Still abstain. \n\nALPHAGROWTH:  YES.  I support this proposal because growing Cardano's DeFi ecosystem, liquidity, and competitiveness is a strategic priority. While I would have preferred stronger attribution and performance metrics upfront, I believe the proposal contains sufficient milestone-based funding, reporting, and governance oversight to justify support. On balance, the opportunity cost of delaying a coordinated growth initiative outweighs the remaining execution risk.\n\nBifrost:  NO. While I support Bitcoin interoperability as a concept, I am not convinced this proposal sufficiently demonstrates the value it will create for Cardano relative to its cost. This is the first phase of a multi-phase initiative that explicitly anticipates a future Treasury proposal for launch and operations, yet the proposal primarily relies on the expectation that Bitcoin liquidity and activity will naturally translate into meaningful value for Cardano. I would have preferred stronger evidence that this infrastructure is likely to drive measurable adoption, on-chain economic activity, and sustainable benefit to the ecosystem before committing Treasury funding to a longer-term roadmap.\n\nVersion 12 von Bergen: ABSTAIN, however know that this is starting to get a bit morbid.  \n\nCardano Enterprise Ticketing: ABSTAIN.  I support enterprise adoption as a strategic priority for Cardano, and I believe this proposal represents a legitimate opportunity. However, I remain divided on whether this is the right path for funding initiatives of this nature. I would have preferred to see enterprise opportunities evaluated through a dedicated catalyst or accelerator-style program rather than as standalone Treasury withdrawals. Given that uncertainty—and the broader community's differing views on the appropriate funding model—I am abstaining."}}