{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"comment":"CIP100:comment"}}},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256","body":{"comment":"This proposal dutifully follows the letter of Cardano’s constitution and procedural guardrails, but it glosses over a far more** critical issue: the integrity and professionalism of those we entrust with constitutional stewardship.**\n\n**Electing members who have not demonstrated the decorum expected of a Constitutional Committee risks eroding community trust and governance legitimacy. **Technical acumen and business savvy are necessary but insufficient when the role demands impartiality, respect, and a commitment to collaborative governance. The absence of any filter or standard for conduct beyond vote totals leaves the door open for personalities that fracture rather than unify. \n\nGiven the Constitutional Committee’s role as a governance cornerstone,** I strongly believe that we must hold members to a higher bar, not just a numerical one. I for one cannot endorse a renewal that fails to address these qualitative concerns.** The Cardano governance framework demands professionalism, not just participation. No from me."}}