{"@context":{"CIP100":"https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#","hashAlgorithm":"CIP100:hashAlgorithm","body":{"@id":"CIP100:body","@context":{"comment":"CIP100:comment"}}},"hashAlgorithm":"blake2b-256","body":{"comment":"I am voting NO on “Intersect Governance coordination and technical stewardship for the Cardano ecosystem.” Intersect does perform governance coordination, incident response, and core‑repo stewardship that Cardano needs, and the technical work in WP2 is important. However, this proposal bundles 25.4M ADA of operations, technical stewardship, and a vague critical‑process reserve into a single all‑or‑nothing request, with security and resilience lines insufficiently itemised and no way to selectively fund the technical work without also approving broader operations and reserve funding.\n\nIn my view, recurring Treasury funding for administrator‑centric structures should be narrowly scoped, clearly separated from overlapping mandates, supported by detailed budgets and verifiable KPIs, and accompanied by a credible multi‑year plan to reduce reliance on Treasury capital. This proposal does not meet that standard, and together with separate Intersect‑related committee budgets, it represents an Intersect funding footprint that is too large, too bundled, and too weakly constrained for me to support under a disciplined treasury‑prudence framework."}}