Withdraw ₳15,750,000 for a MBO for the Cardano ecosystem: Intersect
175 DReps voted · 48 with a rationale
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes 592.3M ₳ Rationale
Summary
Yoroi supports the governance action to fund A member-based organization for the Cardano ecosystem: Intersect with the rationale provided below.Rationale
Decentralized coordination: Intersect plays a vital role in sustaining Cardano’s governance, from roadmap execution to committee operations and protocol upgrades.
Nonprofit model with ecosystem scope: Its structure helps facilitate inclusive participation while supporting essential infrastructure and oversight.
Acknowledging budget increase: The requested budget is significantly higher than previous cycles, though mechanisms like quarterly disbursement and capped allocation help mitigate risk.
Nevertheless, we support this proposal as an investment in the maturity and continuity of Cardano’s decentralized governance.
- Yes 428.5M ₳ Rationale
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that.
There are no significant matters that affect the neutrality of my decision-making.
Detailed rationale and the improvements I would like to see made to the proposal are attached in the following spreadsheet "TW vote #01" or PDF.
Specifically with regards to bundled proposals, next time I would request that one of the following be implemented:
- Bundled proposals should be subject to a temperature check vote for each item.
- I would like bundled proposals to be verified or created by entities, consortia, or individuals selected by the DRep.
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a私はCardanoが数十億人の経済アイデンティティを支えるプラットフォームへ成長していくために必要な投票を行います。この提案書は、それを達成するために必要な事項を実現するための正当なコストを請求しています。
私の意思決定の中立性に影響を与える重大な事項はありません。
根拠の詳細と、提案書について私が改善して欲しい点は、次のスプレッドシートの「TW vote #01」またはPDFに添付されています。
特に、バンドル型提案書に関しては、次回は、次のいずれかが実施されることをリクエストします。
- バンドル型提案書は、内訳別の温度チェックの投票を行うこと。 2. バンドル型提案書は、DRepにより選出されるエンティティやコンソーシアムや個人により、検証または作成されるようにして欲しいと思います。
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a - Yes 328.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 297.4M ₳ Rationale
Summary
EMURGO as DRep votes YES on the governance action to support A member-based organization for the Cardano ecosystem: Intersect.Rationale
EMURGO acknowledges Intersect’s expanding role in coordinating Cardano’s governance and development activities, including managing roadmap processes, supporting elected committees, and maintaining community infrastructure. These responsibilities are essential as the network transitions toward more decentralized execution.While the proposal presents a significant cost increase from the previous cycle, the capped allocation, quarterly disbursement, and commitment to return unused funds provide reasonable guardrails. However, the scale and ambition of the activities outlined make it especially important for the DReps and broader community to monitor delivery closely and ensure the intended value is realized.
Our support reflects recognition of the need for stable coordination infrastructure at this stage of Cardano’s evolution, while also emphasizing the importance of accountability and execution quality.
- Yes 240.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 221.8M ₳ Rationale
TL;DR: EDC voted:
gov_action18nefry4qacd80xzs2srjahxm2e4vz3c8wvrr03rrtk8mdqfuknysq66459t: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqkqx0ecg: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq5nrw6t9: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqj0vdlhj: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqsufvuyl: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqwtnrdnx: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqvckzwqt: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq2yeptuu: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqghuqg03: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqx488pdm: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqyxzxz7k: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqz6d98zp: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqqfgyy3v: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzgf074ea: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzxt5eumh: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzyc3clg6: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzzy7m65d: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzqhm6e8q: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp730y0dn: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp679xfzf: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpcdq823y: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpk0mqrnw: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp5u7pqqr: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpjq3z9u5: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpsn5rx0e: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpwywvhcq: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpvhtd5td: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp2tyw3h6: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpgcp0jyh: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpx66gmxa: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpyflfc4s: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpz4s2af8: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpqx4t762: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq77jt4x4: ABSTAIN
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqudh2k4c: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq63cfnf0: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqczags6z: YES
gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpuz29v77: ABSTAIN
gov_action193leqzml768nz7nmpepzx822a5mzyanqhtewaxjtul5gp6uhwvfsqgl2qg0: YES;We refrained from voting NO on any of the actions, voted ABSTAIN where the majority of our team (7 people) determined that the impact wasn't high enough, the concept wasn't something we would want to support, or the action asked for too much.
Keep in mind, that voting ABSTAIN helps each effected proposal by lowering the absolute voting power needed to pass the action.
- No 174.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 135.1M ₳ Rationale
This document provides an aggregate rationale for the Cardano Foundation DRep’s votes on all Treasury Withdrawal GAs stemming from the approved “Cardano Blockchain Ecosystem Budget - 275M ada Administered by Intersect” (gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh).
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
Our approach is designed to ensure both transparency and efficiency, applying a consistent evaluation framework (see here; the “Evaluation Framework”) to each proposal while presenting our reasoning in a single, comprehensive document.
Our current assessment remains consistent with the principles previously outlined in our public communications and our evaluation during the Ekklesia off-chain signaling phase. As no material changes have been made to the individual proposals since the overarching budget was approved, our votes on these withdrawals reflect our original assessment of them. However, we have changed our previous abstention on the Intersect proposal and our previous “No” vote for the Discover Cardano proposal to a "Yes" vote.
Fund administration clarity is a crucial consideration for our voting decisions. While this budget is approved as a package, we expect Intersect, as administrator, to manage funds diligently, provide public transparency on contracts, and ensure robust oversight, holding recipients accountable for deliverables.
Our voting decisions on the 39 treasury withdrawals are presented in the table below. The "Vote" column displays our votes. For all proposals requesting 3 million ada or more, our assessment is included in the "Note" column.
Table A – Voting Record
Governance Action ID Title Requested ADA Vote Note gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqz6d98zp 2025 Input Output Engineering Core Development Proposal 96,817,080 ABSTAIN We abstain from both the TSC and IO Engineering proposals for the following different reasons: For the TSC proposal, we abstain due to the lack of a credible execution path. Although we support the intent and approach and while we recognise the significant work that went into this proposal, the recent sudden withdrawal of administrative support by the Intersect board makes the proposal unfeasible, even if funded at this time. For the IO Engineering proposal, we abstain as we are not confident that the current version offers sufficient transparency or accountability to justify endorsement. Our concerns stem from the lack of adjustments following constructive community feedback, particularly regarding scope, cost-effectiveness, and safeguards. View Cardano Foundation feedback from 11 May here. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpwywvhcq Catalyst 2025 Proposal by Input Output: Advancing Decentralised Community Innovation Funding & Infrastructure 69,459,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it is important to ensure continuity for the main source of grant funding for the ecosystem during a transition year for governance, especially as Project Catalyst is a funding system that the Cardano ecosystem is familiar with. As the proposal did not fully account for CF's initial budget feedback nor propose activities linked to resolving known shortcomings, we will be monitoring these areas ahead of any subsequent budget proposals by Project Catalyst gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzqhm6e8q Input Output Research (IOR): Cardano Vision - Work Program 2025 26,840,000 ABSTAIN We abstain from this proposal because we view key components of the proposed budget as materially too high, and previous feedback regarding costs and scope, including specific points raised by the Cardano Foundation on March 11 were not adequately addressed. View Cardano Foundation feedback from 11 May here. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp2tyw3h6 A member-based organization for the Cardano ecosystem: Intersect 15,750,000 YES We adjusted our vote from ‘abstain’ to ‘yes’ on this proposal. This reflects our acknowledgement of Intersect's revised 15.75M ada budget, recognizing Intersect's shift towards leaner operations. Our initial vote to abstain based on the discrepancy between the on-chain proposal and the updated off-chain figures, which has been remedied now. We emphasize the importance of having accurate and updated details reflected directly on the Ekklesia platform for all future proposals to ensure transparency and streamline the DRep voting process. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp5u7pqqr Cardano Builder DAO 12,000,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it mitigates the dependency of Cardano on grants by exploring convertible grants to incentivise projects better. The proposal identifies and addresses the gap in post-Catalyst funding for projects needing follow-up support in focusing on achieving product market fit instead of optimising towards grant writing. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqudh2k4c TWEAG’s Proposals for multiple core budget projects for Cardano 2025 11,070,323 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal as we believe supporting diverse contributors increases the resilience of Cardano, and as the proposal demonstrates a collaborative approach, accountability, and an appropriate engagement framework. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpjq3z9u5 Unveiling the First Unified Global Events Marketing Strategy for Cardano 6,000,000 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal as it provides a clear value proposition for Cardano. This proposal was already assessed as part of the Marketing and Growth Budget. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpsn5rx0e Cardano Summit 2025 and regional tech events 6,000,000 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal as it provides a clear value proposition for Cardano. This proposal was already assessed as part of the Marketing and Growth Budget. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqkqx0ecg OSC Budget Proposal - Paid Open Source Model for Sustainable Development 5,885,000 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal as it aligns with the Cardano Vision and Roadmap for 2025 and beyond and contributes to a sustainable developer ecosystem for Cardano. However, we still believe additional details would have strengthened this proposal further. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp730y0dn Expanding Stablecoin / Cardano Native Asset Support / Fiat Ramps 4,000,000 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal as it contributes to the growth in liquidity and DeFi, which we believe is an important value proposition. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpcdq823y Ecosystem Exchange Listing and Market Making service pool 3,126,000 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal in line with the GMC’s voting and according to previous viability assessments. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpuz29v77 High-yield RWA Asset for Cardano : Tokenized Real Estate 3,000,000 YES We vote 'yes' on this proposal as it supports the expansion of the RWA topic. However, there is a lack of alignment with the roadmap, which we would expect to be enhanced afterwards. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqqfgyy3v Midgard - Optimistic Rollups 2,162,096 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpk0mqrnw Complement Catalyst: Extended Quadratic Funding—Zero Operational Costs 1,500,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqyxzxz7k Blockfrost Platform community budget proposal 1,300,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqwtnrdnx zkFold ZK Rollup 1,161,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlp679xfzf Cardano Ecosystem Pavilions at Exhibitions 889,500 YES We adjusted our vote from ‘no’ to ‘yes’ on this proposal. This reflects our acknowledgement of the revised scope to avoid overlapping with other proposals. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzxt5eumh Cardano Product Committee: Community-driven 2030 Cardano Vision and 2026 roadmap insights collection via workshops and structured product research 750,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq77jt4x4 ZK Bridge 700,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpz4s2af8 Scalus - DApps Development Platform 657,692 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpx66gmxa A free Native Asset CDN for Cardano Developers 605,000 NO We vote ‘no’ on this proposal as it does not align with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 3 on Financial and Funding Mechanics. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq5nrw6t9 Complete Web3 developer stack to make Cardano the smart contract layer for Bitcoin 600,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpvhtd5td Beyond Minimum Viable Governance: Iteratively Improving on Cardano Voltaire 592,780 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpqx4t762 Eternl Maintenance 583,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqczags6z Gerolamo - cardano node in typescript 578,571 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqx488pdm Hardware Wallets Maintenance 424,800 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 2 on Committee Budget Proposals and Prior Feedback. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzyc3clg6 PyCardano 314,800 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 3 on Financial and Funding Mechanics. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqj0vdlhj Ledger App Rewrite 300,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpyflfc4s Cexplorer.io – Developer-Focused Blockchain Explorer for Cardano 266,667 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq63cfnf0 MLabs Core Tool Maintenance & Enhancement: Plutarch 243,478 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqsufvuyl Dolos: Sustaining a Lightweight Cardano Data Node 220,914 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlq2yeptuu UTxO RPC: Sustaining Cardano Blockchain Integration 220,914 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqghuqg03 Pallas: Sustaining Critical Rust Tooling for Cardano 220,914 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlpgcp0jyh AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer 212,000 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzzy7m65d OpShin - Python Smart Contracts for Cardano 199,911 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 3 on Financial and Funding Mechanics. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlqvckzwqt Lucid Evolution Maintenance 130,903 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action13tfag48nf94rtjcdq7c06vhkslmxxw9h6c88sl7q5g5nnewcsvlzgf074ea MLabs Research towards Tooling for Elliptical Curves - GrumpleStiltSkin 104,347 YES We vote ‘yes’ on this proposal as it aligns with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action193leqzml768nz7nmpepzx822a5mzyanqhtewaxjtul5gp6uhwvfsqgl2qg0 BloxBean Java Tools Maintenance and Enhancement 99,600 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. gov_action18nefry4qacd80xzs2srjahxm2e4vz3c8wvrr03rrtk8mdqfuknysq66459t MLabs Core Tool Maintenance & Enhancement: Cardano.nix 45,217 ABSTAIN We abstain on this proposal in accordance with the principles of the Evaluation Framework, specifically principle 1 on Scope and Strategic Alignment. Summary of Voting Approach
The Cardano Foundation’s votes on these 39 treasury-withdrawal governance actions are the direct execution of a single, comprehensive review process that began during the off-chain signaling phase. Although we present one aggregate rationale for efficiency, each proposal and governance action was individually assessed against a consistent framework anchored in our publicly stated principles.
Evaluation Framework
As outlined in our blog post, Navigating Budget Changes, our evaluation is guided by several core criteria. For these treasury withdrawals, our assessment focused on three primary areas:
- Strategic Alignment: We prioritized proposals that clearly align with the Cardano 2025 Vision & Roadmap and the principles of "Our Cardano." Proposals demonstrating a direct contribution to core infrastructure, ecosystem growth, decentralization, and sustainability scored highest in our assessment.
- Execution Viability & Financials: We assessed whether the requested funding was appropriate with the project’s scope and whether the team demonstrated the expertise and planning necessary for successful execution. This included a review of the budget breakdown, timelines, and risk considerations.
- Accountability and Delivery Assurance: A critical factor was the proposal’s commitment to transparency and accountability. We looked for clear deliverables, defined success metrics, and robust reporting plans. Given the significant value of Treasury funds, we placed a strong emphasis on frameworks that ensure what is promised is ultimately delivered.
The Cardano Foundation’s votes on these 39 treasury-withdrawal governance actions are the direct execution of a single, comprehensive review process that began during the off-chain signaling phase. Although we present one aggregate rationale for efficiency, each proposal and governance action was individually assessed against a consistent framework anchored in our publicly stated principles.
- No 93.3M ₳ Rationale
The vote for this withdrawal is NO. Details can be found in the rationale.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
I plan to vote YES on most projects I’ve supported in Ekklesia. To stay transparent, I’ll rate each project across six categories, scoring 0 to 2 per category (max 12 points). Projects scoring below 6 won’t get my support. I’ll consider supporting those with 7–8 points, and will fully support any scoring 9 or more.
The categories are:
- Key infrastructure, research, or essential funding: 2
- Team strength, feasibility, and track record: 0
- Impact on the Cardano ecosystem: 1
- Value for money: 0
- Cost compared to similar proposals: 1
- Personal or community usage and benefit: 1
Total score: 5
- Yes 92.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 89.8M ₳ Rationale
SIPO supports the proposal to withdraw ₳15,750,000 for the operational funding of Intersect as a Member-Based Organization (MBO) in the Cardano ecosystem from June 2025 to June 2026.
Why SIPO Votes Yes
Foundational Governance Infrastructure
As Cardano transitions into the Voltaire era, Intersect plays a critical coordination role that complements the decentralized on-chain governance framework. Its neutral and community-aligned structure ensures that network upgrades, elections, budget processes, and DRep support mechanisms function transparently and reliably.Strategic and Technical Stewardship
Intersect is the steward of the core Haskell codebases powering Cardano nodes. It has already demonstrated proven competence through complex upgrades like the Chang and Plomin hard forks. This continued stewardship ensures network safety, roadmap alignment, and upgrade stability.Enabling Participatory Governance
Intersect facilitates over 30 working groups and 8 elected committees composed of community members. This structure promotes practical insight-sharing, community leadership development, and a scalable, plural governance model aligned with the Constitution.Clear Operational and Legal Framework
The proposal includes a detailed delivery mechanism with a Legal Contract between Intersect and Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), milestones, auditing by external entities, and transparent use of smart contracts. This ensures accountability and alignment with constitutional procedures.Transition to Multi-Administrator Governance
Intersect explicitly supports the emergence of new MBOs and multiple future administrators, signaling a genuine commitment to decentralized and federated governance rather than centralized power accumulation.Community Representation and Renewed Leadership
Under Interim Executive Director Jack Briggs and a transitioning board, Intersect is reaffirming its mission to serve the Cardano community with transparency and lean operation. Their history and current reforms suggest a renewed focus on community-first principles.
Conclusion
This proposal is not merely a funding request—it is a structural pillar supporting Cardano’s long-term sustainability. By voting Yes, SIPO affirms its support for stable technical coordination, maturing governance, and transparent ecosystem development.⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
SIPOは、カルダノ・エコシステムのためのMBO（Intersect）の運営資金として₳15,750,000を引き出す提案に賛成票を投じます（2025年6月〜2026年6月の12か月間対象）。
SIPOが「Yes」と投票する理由
ガバナンス基盤の要
カルダノがVoltaire時代に移行する中で、Intersectは分散型ガバナンスを支える中立的で非営利の調整機関として不可欠な役割を果たしています。ネットワークアップグレード、予算プロセス、選挙、DRep支援など、ガバナンス機構の円滑な運営を可能にします。技術的中核の継続的運営
Intersectは、カルダノノードを支えるHaskellコードベースの管理者であり、ChangおよびPlominハードフォークを含む重要アップグレードの調整実績があります。今後も安全なアップグレードとロードマップ整合性を確保するための継続的な運営が期待されます。参加型ガバナンスの推進
Intersectは、30以上のワーキンググループと8つの選出委員会を支援し、非拘束的な提言やDRepへの知見提供を行っています。これにより、草の根的な参加とガバナンスの多層構造が実現されています。明確な運用と法的枠組み
本提案は、IntersectとCardano Development Holdings（CDH）間のリーガル・コントラクト、成果マイルストーン、第三者による監査、スマートコントラクトによる資金管理が含まれており、透明性と責任が明確に担保されています。複数管理者体制への移行支援
Intersectは、将来的に複数のMBOや管理者が登場することを公式に支持しており、単独支配ではなく協調的な分散型ガバナンスモデルを志向しています。コミュニティ重視の新体制
新任の暫定エグゼクティブ・ディレクター Jack Briggs のもと、Intersectは透明性と「leanな運営」を志向する方向に舵を切っており、コミュニティファーストの原則が再確認されています。
結論
本提案は単なる資金調達ではなく、カルダノの持続可能な進化を支える構造的基盤です。SIPOは、「Yes」票を通じて、安定した技術調整と成熟するガバナンス、透明なエコシステム発展への支持を表明します。 - Yes 89.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 89.2M ₳ Rationale
私の投票ポリシーはCARDANO2025ロードマップを実現するべく基盤技術の維持と強化、コア開発と研究、マーケティングの強化を支持しています。事前のオフチェーン投票ではNoにした提案においても、提案内容に関しては一定の必要性を感じているため資金調達プロセスのスケジュールや提案内容を精査したうえでYESに投じます。
My voting policy supports the maintenance and enhancement of foundational technologies, core development and research, and the strengthening of marketing efforts to realize the CARDANO 2025 roadmap. Even for proposals I previously voted "No" on during the off-chain voting phase, I recognize a certain level of necessity in their content. Therefore, after carefully reviewing both the proposal content and the funding schedule, I will cast a "Yes" vote. - Abstain 77.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 76.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 74.7M ₳ No rationale
- No 71.3M ₳ Rationale
I am voting NO. This budget is extremely high and, in my opinion, not justified by the value demonstrated to date. While I welcome the recent leadership changes and a new focus on listening to the community, trust must be earned. I hope they can prove their value going forwards.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
I am voting NO. The budget requested is extremely high and, in my opinion, is not justified by the value Intersect has historically demonstrated to the community.
While there have been positive and negative aspects to their work, I believe trust must be earned before a budget of this magnitude is approved. I am encouraged by the recent leadership changes and a renewed focus on listening to the community. I sincerely hope they can demonstrate clear value and earn our support in the future. I will be monitoring their progress.
- Yes 68M ₳ Rationale
This proposal supports Intersect, a foundational organization for Cardano in the Voltaire era, playing a critical role in maintaining decentralized governance and infrastructure stability.
Intersect’s proven coordination capabilities—demonstrated in upgrades like Chang and Plomin—and its operations under a well-defined legal contract with multisig smart contract oversight by independent third parties contribute to both transparency and accountability.
Taking all these factors into account, I cast a Yes vote.
本提案は、CardanoのVoltaireフェーズにおける重要な基盤機関であるIntersectの活動継続を支えるものであり、ネットワーク全体の統治と技術的安定性の確保に不可欠な役割を果たします。
特に、ChangやPlominといった過去のハードフォークにおけるエコシステム全体の調整・展開実績や、憲法に基づく管理・契約体制のもとでの運用設計、複数の独立監査者によるスマートコントラクトのチェック機構は、透明性と信頼性の両立を評価できる要素です。
こうした要素を総合的に評価し、Yes票を投じます。
- Yes 65.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 62.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 50.5M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 49.8M ₳ Rationale
As a DRep, I voted for all projects in the 2025 budget vote based on a very simple principle:\n\n- Yes if I believe the long-term value to the Cardano ecosystem exceeds the requested amount;\n- No if it doesn't;\n- Abstain if I'm unsure.\n\nAll of my votes are consistent with my position in the May 2025 Ekklesia round.
- No 49.7M ₳ Rationale
Following the previous vote on Ekklesia.
- No 48.4M ₳ Rationale
The budget to run this MBO is way too high
- No 42.4M ₳ No rationale
- No 40M ₳ Rationale
While I appreciate the work that has been done by Intersect, the requested amount is much too high for a new MBO, especially when Cardano already already has 3 established large founding entities that could work as Administrators as well. This amount of funding is much more than most Cardano Startups have ever received and put into the wrong place in my opinion. I would like to see Intersect restructure this and come back with a more reasonable ask.
Also: What happens to all the 38 other proposals if this one does not get funded? I hope another founding entity will step in as Administrator.
Normally this proposal should've been the first to be submitted before Intersect commits to being an Administrator.
- Yes 38.1M ₳ No rationale
- No 36.8M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 34.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 34.3M ₳ Rationale
Socious has voted in favor of all 39 Treasury Withdrawal proposals submitted. These proposals were selected through a well-defined process, and we fully support them out of respect for the will of the broader Cardano community.
- Yes 32.3M ₳ Rationale
Voting yes. While Intersect is not perfect, it's the only funded entity with formal community representation. Under Jack’s leadership it’s taken big steps toward transparency and decentralization. This aligns with HOSKY’s Cardano First governance platform.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
Intersect Treasury Withdrawal Rationale
Rationale Statement
As a DRep, I place community voice and decentralized governance at the center of every vote. While Intersect has drawn criticism in the past, I also recognize and appreciate when an entity begins to meaningfully include the community it is meant to serve.Under Jack Briggs' leadership, Intersect has demonstrated a renewed commitment to transparency and inclusion. The organization now includes two community-elected board members, with plans to expand community representation further. This is a tangible step toward decentralizing what was once a more opaque entity.
More importantly, Intersect is currently the only governance-facing organization with formal community representation and infrastructure coordination responsibilities. It is actively stewarding the Cardano node repositories, coordinating hard forks, supporting 30+ working groups, and facilitating the roadmap and budget processes, all while beginning to trial formal stipends for elected committee members.
This request is in line with the approved ecosystem budget, includes a structured legal contract, 3rd-party milestone assurance, and on-chain treasury management via Sundae Labs smart contracts. These mechanisms satisfy the constitutional requirements for transparency, accountability, and responsible use of treasury funds.
As a dRep aligned with the Cardano First platform, I value decentralization, responsible treasury management, and giving voice to the community. Intersect’s trajectory is finally aligning with those principles.
For these reasons, I am voting Yes on this request. Intersect is evolving in the right direction, and deserves the opportunity to continue doing so.
- Abstain 31M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 29.3M ₳ No rationale
- Abstain 28.2M ₳ Rationale
Intersect has stepped up to fulfill the role of pioneering the first era of governance on Cardano. The process hasn't been perfect, but they have course corrected multiple times and listened to community feedback. In general I still feel like the ask is a bit too high to justify a YES vote, but now that the unknowns of the governance process are moving into the past, Intersect is working on narrowing their focus to cover just those things that are in their purview. Considering all the unknowns of governance, I think the fact that they did more than necessary is better than the alternative of having not done enough.
- Yes 27.9M ₳ No rationale
- No 25.9M ₳ Rationale
While Intersect was established to represent the interests of the DRep community, it has not effectively fulfilled this role, particularly in terms of incorporating early and ongoing feedback. Much of the current frustration and fatigue surrounding Cardano's governance process can be traced back to decisions made by the Intersect Board—whose authority to define key governance workflows remains unclear and lacks broad legitimacy (due to the absence of onchain elected board members).
The recent proposal to support alternatives outside the 39 governance proposals marks, in my view, a decisive misstep. For this reason, I will be voting NO on the proposal.
I believe Intersect requires structural reform, including the establishment of a transparent, on-chain governance board and a revised decision-making process. Rather than proceeding under the current framework, I support pausing its operations, redesigning its governance structure, and bringing the proposal back to vote once a credible and community-aligned solution is in place.
- Yes 25.2M ₳ Rationale
I have voted YES on the current proposal to fund Intersect. In addition to providing a critical need of budget administration, Intetrsect is doing vital work in identifying ecosystem needs such aligning components for governance execution and achieving community consensus on Cardano product sustainability vision/strategy. Furthermore, and possibly more importantly, Intersect has successfully provided a forum where the community can come together to solve problems.
- Yes 22.7M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 22M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 21.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 21.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 20.3M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 19.9M ₳ Rationale
As a Drep, I vote yes on this proposal in line with my Ekklesia vote earlier this year.
- Yes 17.4M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 17.1M ₳ No rationale
- No 16.7M ₳ Rationale
Long-Term Sustainability
Intersect was established to manage key aspects of decentralized governance under Voltaire. While the function is important, the proposal provides minimal evidence that its operations to date have significantly contributed to long-term sustainability or improved governance outcomes in measurable terms.Builder and Ecosystem Growth
The proposal does not clearly explain how Intersect’s work benefits developers or builders. Its focus is administrative and process-oriented, with few deliverables tied to tooling, infrastructure, or direct ecosystem growth.Decentralization and Community Engagement
Despite its intended role as a community-led entity, Intersect remains non-elected, membership-gated, and operationally opaque. Community members have little insight into internal decision-making, committee compensation, or how resources are allocated. This weakens its claim to serve as a model of decentralized governance.Responsible Treasury Spending
₳15,750,000 is a massive budget request—enough to fund a 150-person company for a year—yet the proposal lacks a detailed cost structure, staffing plan, or milestones. There is no clear justification for how funds will be deployed or assessed.
Additionally, Cardano’s three founding entities (IOG, Cardano Foundation, and Emurgo) have ample resources—via genesis ADA allocations and staking revenue—to fund and support an organization like Intersect if they believe in its strategic necessity. It is not evident why such a large burden must be shifted to the treasury at this stage.
We vote NO, and call for a future funding request that includes a transparent budget, independently audited results, and community-elected oversight mechanisms. Treasury funds must be reserved for clear, accountable public goods, not opaque operations. - Yes 16.4M ₳ Rationale
Treasury withdrawals
Software Development Proposals:
Development budgets should not be funded from the treasury. Instead, the treasury should be used to incentivize feature completion through grants. The treasury should not operate as a venture capital fund or to fund ongoing development budgets. It should be results oriented and decoupled from budgeting. Dracula DAO Deep will make exceptions this round for projects that deliver specific, high value features or results at a reasonable ask amount.Marketing Proposals:
Marketing budgets are the best way to fund these types of efforts. Judgement should be used based on the ask amount and value proposition.Research Proposals:
Research budgets should be evaluated based on the track record of the team being funded, the value proposition and whether the results are released to the public.DAO Funding:
DraculaDAO believes DAOs should find other ways to support operations other than public treasury funds.Bitcoin:
Dracula DAO Deep is against purchasing Bitcoin with treasury funds, and are generally not in favor of a tight Bitcoin / Cardano partnership. Bitcoin DeFi is ok as long as the value proposition remains with Cardano. Cardano is already Bitcoin++ and treasury funds should not be used to encourage or sustain BTC energy waste and outdated consensus model.Yes - MLabs Core Tool Maintenance. Ask is reasonable.
Yes - Midgard Optimistic Rollups. This is urgently needed as an L2 solution for Cardano and the ask is reasonable.
Yes - Hardware Wallets Maintenance. This is necessary and ask is reasonable.
Yes - Pallas Rust Tooling. Core tooling used by many projects and ask is reasonable for the specific deliverable.
Yes - UTxO RPC
Yes - Lucid Evolution Maintenance
Yes - zkFold ZK Rollup
Yes - Dolos. Ask is reasonable with specific deliverable.
Yes - Ledger App rewrite
Yes - Paid Open Source Model. This looks like a nice way to take the VC function out of the treasury and start towards incentivizing projects through features and benefits like bug bounties. Willing to take a chance on this, but will vote no in the future if results are disappointing.
Yes - Gerolamo node in typescript
Yes - MLabs Core Tools: Plutarch. Ask is reasonable
Yes - ZK Bridge
Yes - Eternal maintenance
Yes - Scalus Development Platform
Yes - Cexplorer.io
Yes - Native Asset CDN
Yes - Adastat.net
Yes - Intersect MBO. DraculaDAO does not like the high ask amount and the budgeting approach, but for Intersect MBO there may not be a better way like there is with software development. Therefore DraculaDAO supports this proposal, realizing this possibly breaks with the general guidelines DraculaDAO described above.
Yes - Beyond Minimum Viable Governance. Focused feature set and reasonable ask. IOHK should use this approach for all its teams.
Yes - Cardano Summit
Yes - Unified Global Events Marketing
Yes - Quadratic Funding. Reasonable ask for a specific feature.
Yes - Cardano Ecosystem Pavilions
Yes - High-yield RWA Asset. Direct communication with this vendor increased our faith in this project and have changed our stance on this.
Yes - Expanding Stablecoin / Native Asset Support. This was marginal in terms of ask amount and number of features grouped together.
Yes - OpShin
Yes - PyCardano
Yes - Cardano Product Committee
Yes - BloxBean Java Tools
Yes - Input Output Research
Yes - MLabs ResearchAbstain - Input Output Core Development. This is simply a warning shot as DraculaDAO expects this proposal will pass. We are generally in favor of the initiatives and features being delivered by IOHK, but believe the ask is too high as a single budget line item and do not want to set a precedent of another ask of similar magnitude for the next budget cycle. Instead, IOHK should divide its deliverables into features and ask the treasury for grant incentives delivered on completion of the each feature (see Beyond Minimum Viable Governance as what we see as a good example). We are not in favor of such a large withdrawal encompassing such a large number of features. In general we do not support using the treasury for budget line items as mentioned in the introduction to this rationale.
Abstain - Blockfrost Community Budget. We support Blockfrost and operate an icebreaker node. There are no specific features mentioned, just an ongoing budget line item, which we do not support. We will support Blockfrost in other ways.No - Web3 developer stack for Bitcoin integration. DraculaDAO does not support a tight integration with Bitcoin.
No - TWEAG Proposals. We see value there but the ask is too large and too many deliverables bundled together.
No - Catalyst 2025. Ask is too large as a single budget request.
No - Cardano Builder DAO. Treasury should not be used to incentivize features, not fund ongoing budgets for software development or DAOs.
No - Market making should have other ways to fund operations. - Yes 14.2M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 14.1M ₳ No rationale
- Yes 12.2M ₳ Rationale
Disclaimer: This is a general rationale we have prepared to support our “yes” vote on all the 39 treasury withdrawal actions. This follows careful review and consideration of the metadata of these treasury withdrawal proposals and hence is not a blanket voting practice.
We, the Wada DRep Committee, have decided to upvote on all 39 Treasury Withdrawal governance actions currently live on-chain and submitted under the administration of IntersectMBO. These actions are the necessary implementation step following the community's approval of the ₳275.3 million Cardano Ecosystem Budget, the necessary budget info action that precedes the treasury withdrawal process. Our support reflects not only continuity with our earlier "yes" votes on the overarching budget info action and its constituent proposals but also our confidence in the smart contract guide and project execution mechanisms Intersect has established as an administrative body for these proposals.
Each of these 39 withdrawals corresponds directly to proposals that have already passed a respective Budget Info Action with wide community and DRep support of 64.23%. As Wada DRep, we reviewed, scored, and supported many of these initiatives during the budgeting phase, using our internal ₳280M Net Change Limit framework. Our endorsement of the full ₳275.3M package was not a blanket approval but the outcome of detailed deliberation. Therefore, we see it as our responsibility to honor those community-approved funding decisions by affirming these follow-up Treasury withdrawal governance actions.
Importantly, we are confident in Intersect’s role as the administrator of these treasury disbursements. We have independently reviewed the Smart Contract Guide, disbursement architecture, and accountability structures associated with these withdrawals. The use of milestone-gated smart contracts, multi-signature treasuries, and on-chain/off-chain tracking mechanisms provides strong assurance of transparency, risk management, and community accountability. We are particularly satisfied that Intersect has adopted security-audited contract templates and provides public documentation on how treasury funds will be administered, paused if necessary, and even returned if unused.
In our view, rejecting or abstaining from these Treasury Withdrawals at this stage would risk destabilizing delivery timelines, undermining community trust, and introducing administrative conflicts that may violate the spirit of the Constitution’s Articles on budgeting. We believe that treasury funding is not just about allocation; it’s about consistent and credible execution. As such, the DRep role requires continuity and follow-through, especially when prior voting outcomes have clearly mandated action.
Therefore, in alignment with our constitutional responsibilities, community-aligned decision-making, and our assessment of Intersect’s administrative protocols, we have decided to upvote on all 39 Treasury Withdrawals Governance Actions.