BTCnADA

I recognize that Cardano maintenance is essential. Node maintenance, DevOps, monitoring, QA, release support, documentation, and component maintenance are foundational activities that the entire ecosystem depends on.

However, this proposal requests ₳62,134,630, making it one of the largest single funding requests in this round. For a Treasury Withdrawal of this size, I believe the current level of budget disclosure is not sufficient. While the proposal provides high-level categories such as Development, Infrastructure, Engagement, Operations, Security & Audits, and others, it lacks a more detailed cost structure, including team size, role allocation, salary ranges, infrastructure cost breakdowns, audit and testing costs, outsourcing costs, delivery milestones, and specific budgets and acceptance criteria for each functional area.

My concern is not that maintenance is unimportant. My concern is that voters currently do not have enough information to determine whether this ₳62M+ request is reasonable, efficient, and sufficiently accountable. Cardano Treasury funds are public funds. The larger the request, the higher the standard should be for transparency, cost breakdowns, milestones, monthly reporting, and measurable deliverables.

Given the current level of disclosure, I cannot support this proposal in its present form. I would encourage the proposer to provide a more detailed budget breakdown and verifiable deliverables before seeking community approval again.

我認同 Cardano 的維護工作是必要且重要的。節點維護、DevOps、監控、QA、release support、文件維護與各項元件維護，都是整個生態系持續運作所依賴的基礎工作。

然而，本提案申請金額高達 ₳62,134,630，是本輪最大單筆資金申請案之一。對於這種規模的 Treasury Withdrawal，我認為目前的預算揭露程度仍然不足。雖然提案中列出了 Development、Infrastructure、Engagement、Operations、Security & Audits 等高階分類，但仍缺少更細部的成本結構，例如團隊人數、角色分工、薪資區間、基礎設施成本明細、審計與測試成本、外包成本、交付里程碑，以及各 functional area 對應的具體預算與驗收標準。

我的疑慮並不是 maintenance 不重要，而是目前投票人沒有足夠資訊去判斷這筆 ₳62M+ 的支出是否合理、是否有效率，以及是否具備足夠的 accountability。Cardano Treasury 是公共資金，申請金額越大，對透明度、成本拆分、里程碑、月度報告與可衡量交付成果的要求就應該越高。

在目前資訊揭露程度下，我無法支持本提案的現行版本。我建議提案方補充更詳細的預算拆分與可驗收成果後，再重新尋求社群授權。

I recognize that Layer 2 scaling can provide long-term value for Cardano. The Midgard Labs proposal aims to build Layer 2 scaling capabilities for Cardano, allowing certain high-frequency, low-cost, and low-latency applications to operate outside the main chain while still settling back to Cardano. If successful, this type of infrastructure could help expand Cardano’s future application capacity.

However, this proposal requests ₳10,425,871, which represents a significant Treasury Withdrawal. At Cardano’s current stage, I believe the more fundamental and survival-level priorities remain mainnet maintenance, core infrastructure stability, and the advancement of main-chain scaling efforts such as Leios.

My concern is not that Layer 2 is unimportant. Rather, Cardano first needs to strengthen the performance, stability, developer experience, and reliability of the main chain and its core infrastructure. If the base layer is not sufficiently reinforced, allocating a large amount of Treasury funding to Layer 2 scaling at this stage may dilute both Treasury resources and governance attention.

Therefore, I see this proposal as technically valuable, but not the highest priority at the current stage. Once mainnet maintenance, Leios-based main-chain scaling, and core infrastructure have made clearer progress, Layer 2 solutions would be more appropriate for renewed evaluation and potential support.

我認同 Layer 2 擴容對 Cardano 的長期發展具有潛在價值。Midgard Labs 提案希望為 Cardano 建設二層擴容能力，讓部分高頻、低費用、低延遲的應用可以在主鏈之外運行，同時仍與 Cardano 主鏈進行結算。這類基礎設施若能成功，未來可能有助於提升 Cardano 的應用承載能力。

然而，本提案申請金額為 ₳10,425,871，屬於相當大額的 Treasury Withdrawal。以目前 Cardano 的發展階段來看，我認為更核心、更接近生存級需求的優先事項，仍然是主網維護、核心基礎設施穩定性，以及 Leios 等主鏈擴容路線的推進。

我的疑慮並不是 Layer 2 不重要，而是 Cardano 目前更需要先確保主鏈本身的性能、穩定性、開發者體驗與基礎設施可靠度。若主鏈基礎尚未充分強化，過早投入大額資金於二層擴容，可能會分散 Treasury 資源與治理注意力。

因此，我認為本提案具有技術探索價值，但在目前階段並非最高優先級。若未來主網維護、Leios 主鏈擴容與核心基礎設施已有更明確進展，Layer 2 方案會更適合被重新評估與支持。