drep1y23tfs3c25kfm...
827,826 ₳827.8K ₳voting power
26 delegators0.02% of active voting power
About
Overview
Generated from public on-chain data
drep1y23tfs3c25kfm... is an active Cardano DRep, registered in epoch 539. They hold 827.8K ₳ of delegated voting power, about 0.02% of the active stake. drep1y23tfs3c25kfm... has cast 15 on-chain governance votes (5 yes, 10 no, 0 abstain). Since registering, they have taken part in 15 of 145 decided actions (10%). They have published 3 rationales explaining their votes.
Governance record
- Yes5 (33%)
- No10 (67%)
- Abstain0 (0%)
No vote changes
Percentiles compare active DReps with at least five concluded actions since their registration. What these numbers mean
Recognition (5)
Activity
Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.
NoDingo: a Production-Grade Block Producer in Go by Blink LabsDecided epoch 625View rationaleEnacted6mo ago
I am voting NO on the Dingo proposal because I believe it represents unnecessary redundancy. With the community already supporting the development of a second node implementation (Amaru), allocating another 6.9M ADA to a third implementation—managed by a private company rather than a non-profit—is not a prudent use of treasury funds. Furthermore, the $250k per FTE personnel costs and the recurring $500k audit fees across multiple projects suggest a lack of capital efficiency in our core infrastructure funding.
NoCardano Budget Process Framework (facilitated by Intersect)Decided epoch 623View rationaleClosed6mo ago
I am voting NO because this framework creates an exclusionary 'pay-to-play' system. The 1,000 ADA entry fee and 100,000 ADA minimum request size protect the interests of large organizations while shutting out the grassroots developers who are the heartbeat of Cardano. Furthermore, I oppose the use of off-chain filters to decide on-chain outcomes. Governance should remain as direct and permissionless as possible, without institutional gatekeepers.
NoAmaru Treasury Withdrawal 2026Decided epoch 621View rationaleEnacted6mo ago
DRep Rationale: Why I am voting "NO" on Amaru 2026
While I value the technical expertise of the Amaru team and the importance of node diversity, I am voting NO on this withdrawal for the following reasons:
Inefficient Treasury Allocation: The 4M ADA "market contingency" buffer is excessive. It locks up significant community capital that could be used for other initiatives. I prefer a model where projects request additional funds if market conditions shift, rather than over-budgeting by 40%.
Performance vs. Cost: The 2025 retrospective shows that key deliverables like Block Production and Mempool implementation are behind schedule. I cannot support a 10.1M ADA expansion until the primary goals of the previous funding round are fully realized and stable.
High Overhead: The fixed costs (Audit and Testing) and high FTE rates set a high-cost precedent for Cardano development. I am looking for proposals that demonstrate more aggressive cost-optimization for the benefit of the ADA holders.
I encourage the Amaru team to return with a more focused, milestone-driven proposal that addresses the current delays without the heavy contingency padding.
On-chain profile details
- DRep ID
- drep1y23t...gq5dx7c7
- Registered since
- Feb 9, 2025
- Last metadata update
- 1y ago
- Data freshness
- On-chain data as of 1d ago