About
Objectives
Mubarak Oladimeji || Blockchain Enthusiast || Cardano Innovator || Intersect MWG https://docs.google.com/document/d/12Tt6Zip2w2IHBOlymIrIA3OWsnHvp6eOjTbHtVyMDxE/edit
Motivations
My reason for becoming a DRep stems from my deep desire to represent the cause of true freedom and decentralization. I intend to embody the core principles and ethos of the Cardano Blockchain ecosystem which includes; decentralization, innovation, transparency and accountability. I intend to help facilitate and foster a truly inclusive decentralized governance system on the Cardano Blockchain ecosystem by giving voice to the voiceless, representing the underrepresented and generally ensuring that I have a well-rounded view of all points to make informed decisions about the future of Cardano 私が DRep になった理由は、真の自由と分散化の大義を代表したいという深い願望から来ています。私は、Cardano ブロックチェーン エコシステムの中核となる原則と精神を体現するつもりです。分散化、イノベーション、透明性、説明責任。 私は、声なき人々に声を与え、過小評価されている人々を代表し、一般的にカルダノブロックチェーンエコシステムの将来について情報に基づいた意思決定を行うためのすべての点について包括的な視点を確保することで、カルダノブロックチェーンエコシステムにおける真に包括的な分散型ガバナンスシステムの促進と育成を支援するつもりです。カルダノ
Read moreShow less
Qualifications
Mathematics & Education (BSc in a few months), Blockchain Expert and Marketer, Founder/Team Lead; Cardano Lagos Festival, Intersect Marketing WG PR Lead, Web3 Pioneer & Early Adopter in Nigeria, DRep Pioneer (Lagos, Nigeria), Nigerian Cardano Constitutional Alternate.
Governance record
- Yes5 (38%)
- No3 (23%)
- Abstain5 (38%)
No vote changes
Recognition (6)
Activity
Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.
Show 8 moreShow less
AbstainSet 2025 Net Change Limit of 300M ADA, 2026 Net Change Limit of 250M ADADecided epoch 553revotedHistoryRationale unavailableClosed1y ago
Earlier votes
Abstain1y agoSuperseded
I didn’t vote “YES” on this governance action for Net Change Limit because of the fact that it fixed this year, 2025 NCL to be way more than next year, 2026 at 300 million ADA to
250 million ADA respectively. I thought it’d have made more sense for the reverse (ie; 250 for this year and 300 for next year) since — to my understanding — we only have about six months to execute this year’s budget and a full year for next year.
Other than that fact, however, I find no other issue with this proposal, but since I could not — in good conscience — ignore the discrepancies with the number and also at the same time dismiss the rest of the proposal by voting no because of that. Hence, I hereby vote “ABSTAIN”
On-chain profile details
- DRep ID
- drep1ygk7...mgvuk5a7
- Payment address
- addr1q9w4...mqmmgzvr
- Registered since
- Jan 28, 2025
- Last metadata update
- 1y ago
- Data freshness
- On-chain data as of 4d ago