DRep

Leo of the Brothership (@BrothershipPool)

drep1ytw5...3s8npegv
535,205 ₳Voting power3Delegators0.01%Influence
Voting power trend<0.1%vs last epoch
533.9K ₳980.6K ₳Epoch 638Epoch 645
45.4%over 8 epochs

Badges (9)

Shows the Work
Bronze
Identified
Veteran
All badges →

To serve as an active and transparent dRep in Cardano's Voltaire governance era. I focus on making well-reasoned, community-aligned decisions that promote long-term network sustainability, innovation, and decentralization.

Motivations

As a builder and long-time participant in the Cardano ecosystem, I want to directly contribute to governance by providing clear voting rationales and helping steer the protocol toward real utility and growth.

Qualifications

Founder of LNL Labs (@LNLLabs), CTO of GenWealth App (@genwealth_app), Developer at keyPactWallet (@keyPactWallet), Voting Member of the Technical Steering Committee (TSC) at Intersect MBO (@IntersectMBO). Registered dRep (drep1ytw5tvdxpe39l9gm3g49gl0whwd2dgu4mcf5ml5z3zfuk3s8npegv) with consistent on-chain voting and public rationale on treasury and maintenance proposals.

Payment address: addr1qykn...4qwvptwe

On-chain data as of 4d ago.

Forum activity (0)

No forum posts yet.

Voting stats

26votes
  • Yes11 (42%)
  • No14 (54%)
  • Abstain1 (4%)
Rationale22 of 26 votes with rationale85%
ParticipationVoted on 26 of 136 concluded actions19%

Voting history (26)

NoCardano at TOKEN2049 Singapore 2026: Baseline ‘Platinum' Sponsorship ProposalEpoch 635RationaleEnacted2mo ago

Retire the YOROI dRep

YesIO & VacuumLabs: Enhancing Plutus - Performance, Correctness, and UsabilityEpoch 634RationaleEnacted2mo ago

This proposal not only brings a better more robust DevEx to cardano it also inhanses Cardanos unique selling point or reliability, without a doubt the best easiest YES I can give to any of the IOG proposals

The IOG team delivering them is undoubtedly the best implementor we could ask for.

It is a little pricey, but that is to be expected if we are demanding the best of the best to work on our core infrastructure.

YesIO: Cardano High Assurance Technical CollaborationEpoch 634RationaleEnacted2mo ago

Cardano unique selling point has always been reliability, this tooling strengthens that position

The IOG team delivering them is undoubtedly the best implementor we could ask for.

It is a little pricey, but that is to be expected if we are demanding the best of the best to work on our core infrastructure.

YesIO: Cardano UpgradesEpoch 634RationaleEnacted2mo ago

Happy to vote Yes on this.

This proposal adds several very useful primitives to the cardano ledger, the IOG team delivering them is undoubtedly the best implementor we could ask for.

It is a little pricey, but that is to be expected if we are demanding the best of the best to work on our core infrastructure.

NoPogun: Capital Without CompromiseEpoch 633RationaleExpired2mo ago

I am deeply disappointed in the pogun lack of clarification around issues critical to their planed implementation of the DefiKernel, the Kernel is the one Defi innovation that has ever gotten me excited about Defi after almost 10 years in the crypto space, it is critical that it is implemented correctly.

Additionally the team does not seem to realize critical shortcomings in their planned technology, or is pretending to not realize them in an effort to push them down the line.

The inclusion of every high-fame developer in their advisors roster to boost their credibility is something I do not appreciate

And while the revenue sharing is a very good mechanism, the offered % are subpar to what I would hope and expect.

Show 21 moreShow less
NoIO & Midgard Labs: L2 Scalability InitiativeEpoch 633RationaleExpired2mo ago

While Phil is an excellent developer, he is stretched too thin and being involved in too much controversy lately.

Additionally I do not believe this work should be under IOG, IOG is our star development firm and should be protected from being stretched too thin, or centralizing too much of the Cardano stack around them.

I would support a renewed proposal from Midgard labs, with Midgard Labs being in the driver seat, at a later date

AbstainIO & Ensurable Systems: Cardano Maintenance InitiativeEpoch 634RationaleEnacted2mo ago

This proposal is critical, since maintenance is non-optional for that reason I cannot in good conscience vote against it

On the other side it is:
Ridiculously overpriced, it is essentially highway robbery exploiting our need for it
Contains work items that should have been delivered as part of the cardano-node development , how on hell did IOG perform principles first formal verification on the node if “comprehensive specifications covering consensus” was not created beforehand ?
The Cardano-node is supposedly built with high-reliability methodology , namely “formal verification/proofs”, the result of that should be a node that requires less maintenance, yet we are stuck here with a bill for maintenance that is 10x what other node teams are asking for development

For this 3 reasons I cannot vote YES, leaving me with the only option as abstain!

YesIO: Consensus InitiativeEpoch 634RationaleEnacted3mo ago

Even though Scaling was part of the original road-map, paid for by the ICO and the Genesis ADA allocation

Leios is very important to the future of Cardano and IOG is the only organization with the Capacity to deliver it in a timely fashion

NoBlockfrost: Maintenance and Next Generation IndexingEpoch 633RationaleExpired3mo ago

Blockfrost is a private label service, It does not make any sense funding via the treasury.

The idea of having a truly verifiable and distributed query layer for Cardano to complete the e2e is very romantic.

We
A) have a plethora of query standards currently (Koios, UTXOrpc, Blockfrost, oura, koios etc etx)
B) IOG is already a point of centralization, concentrating more power to them by assisting Blockfrost cementing their self's as THE api for wallets and dAps not a good strategic move

NoIO: Developer Experience InitiativeEpoch 634RationaleEnacted3mo ago

I Have seen the Cardano documentation degrade in quality since 2019, IOG has demonstrated a complete inability to foster an intuitive and easy to onboard development ecosystem.

Giving them more money to continue working on something they are demonstrated an inability to do well is like to throwing ADA down a well.

NoCardano Summit 2026 and TOKEN2049 SingaporeEpoch 630RationaleExpired3mo ago

Absolutely not, the CF and Emurgo would do well to
A) Deploy their own genesis allocations to promote the ecosystem
B) Dismantling the dRep attack perpetrated through the Yoroi deceptive UX

before coming for Treasury funds, non the less for an overpriced event.

NoPebble + Gerolamo - HLabs 2026 BudgetEpoch 628RationaleExpired3mo ago

The least capable team building a full node for Cardano, already took massive amounts of funds with little to show for it.

NoApprove Cardano Foundation as New Managing Entity of Project CatalystEpoch 626RationaleClosed3mo ago

The CF has alreaddy meddled with Catalist in the path, leadership at the foundation continues to show an ridiculous lack of care about cardano, preserving their own allocation to ensure their pay-packages.

Tech team at the CF is solid but that does not absolve the leadership

YesDingo: a Production-Grade Block Producer in Go by Blink LabsEpoch 625RationaleEnacted3mo ago

LGTM

NoCardano Defi Liquidity Budget - Withdrawal 1Epoch 625RationaleEnacted4mo ago

Nop, no bottom selling

YesIncrease Transaction and Block Memory Units (Part 1 of 2)Epoch 614RationaleEnacted5mo ago

lgtm

NoCardano 2030: Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework and KPIsEpoch 608RationaleClosed6mo ago

KPI's need much stronger definitions, and much larger targets.

YesCARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v2.4Epoch 609RationaleEnacted6mo ago

looks good to me.

NoLoan ₳5,000,000 to Expand Cardano's Global ListingsEpoch 598RationaleEnacted8mo ago

Memes are a distraction from the purpose of Crypto in general and Cardano specifically, we should not be encouraging this behaviour!

NoConstitutional Committee Compensation Epochs 581-653Epoch 596RationaleClosed8mo ago

I am against the authority or the CC, attracting people that would like to exploit the system with rewards is a step in the wrong direction. We should be doing anything and everything in our power to deprecate the need for a CC.

YesCARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v2.3Epoch 593RationaleExpired8mo ago

ADA-holder is the correct definition, ADA-owner is a legal term allowing governments to abuse our system

Cardano supersedes any legacy government or court, the new terminology defines this much more clearly.

We are not here to play nice and be subservient to the legacy systems! We are here to conquer them and offer all people of earth a system of true equality and opportunity, out of reach from any form of authority that would seek to manipulate it!

NoBudget: ₳5M Loan for Cardano's Global Listing Expansion - Powered by SnekEpoch 587RationaleClosed10mo ago

Memes are a distraction, a side-road attraction in the path to the changing of the world.

Getting stuck in a mentality that memes are the achievement of decentralization goes against everything I hope we achieve with blockchain. As such I cannot approve the normalization of meme-gambling and I cannot approve the distribution of funds to meme-projects.

My stance on memes has always been the same, "I let the children play" , it's good to find fan and I do not have the intension or right to stop you, but it is not something to be taken seriously under any circumstance!

Yes2025 Cardano NCLEpoch 561Closed1y ago
No2025 Net Change LimitEpoch 554Closed1y ago