DRepTalk
Sign in
Enter as DRepEnter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Governance ActionsDiscussions
DRep directoryFind your DRepMovers of the epochBadgesRegister as a DRep
AnalyticsGovernance ReviewTreasury
Help guidesGlossary
Install app
Sign in
More ways to sign in
Enter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
DRepActive

No Treasury Withdrawals until ADA > $3

drep1ytpk...nsr4hxfp
drep.link/no-treasury-withdrawals-until-ada-3

345,341 ₳345.3K ₳voting power

21 delegators0.01% of active voting power

About

Objectives

Concerned Cardano Citizen

Motivations

Founding entities have massive power over the ecosystem. They have an incentive to keep drawing treasury funds and provide less than optimal results. A natural hard-line opposition must be formed to counter the FE heavy voting power. Freedom to delegate/un-delegate to this dRep when the ADA price matches your treasury spending criteria is a self regulating voting with your wallet.

Read moreShow less

Qualifications

none

Governance record

Participation98%Voted on 63 of 64 concluded actionsAhead of 92% of 295 active DReps
Votes with rationale6%4 of 63 votes with rationaleAhead of 46% of 293 active DReps with votes
Vote timingDay 11.9Median point after submission across 63 timed votes
Voting pattern
63votes
  • Yes3 (5%)
  • No55 (87%)
  • Abstain5 (8%)

Changed vote on 2 actions3 changes total

Percentiles compare active DReps with at least five concluded actions since their registration. What these numbers mean

Voting power trend0.4%vs last epoch
338.1K ₳361.7K ₳21Epoch 648Epoch 663338.1K ₳361.7K ₳21Epoch 648Epoch 663
2.1%over 16 epochsDelegators21+1over 16 epochs

Recognition (5)

Hard Fork Voter
Iron Streak
Silver
Active Voice
Silver
Early Bird
First Vote
View all 5 badges

Activity

Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.

YesReimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.Decided epoch 656View rationaleExpired2mo ago

As last time - this is a reimbursement of funds so it is an exception to my policy of treasury protection.

NoNet Change Limit: Cardano Treasury (Epochs 613-713)Decided epoch 647View rationaleClosed3mo ago

Voting HARD NO and advising all dReps to vote similar.

This will set bad precedent and pre-condition for immense treasury raiding.

Note who approves.

NoStrike Finance Liquidity DeploymentDecided epoch 644View rationaleExpired4mo ago

I would love to vote yes on this if it was really a loan with proper collateral (it is one of my exceptions for a YES).

Unfortunately the proposal does not fit that criteria.

Best of luck

YesReimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.Decided epoch 643changed from AbstainView rationaleExpired4mo ago

This apparently needs explaining, but the concept of ownership is as follows - this amount does not belong to the treasury so it should be returned.

It is a clear exception to my dRep statement and mission to prevent excessive spending. Other possible exceptions for a YES vote are:

  • Loans with BTC/Stable-coin collateral
  • Burning treasury funds
  • Setting NCL to the amount of YoY treasury income.

All the best and happy voting.

Earlier votes

Abstain4mo agoSuperseded

Yes4mo agoSuperseded

On-chain profile details

DRep ID
drep1ytpk...nsr4hxfp
Payment address
addr1qxan...qqayq4jh
Registered since
Apr 25, 2026
Last metadata update
6mo ago
Data freshness
On-chain data as of 4d ago