Developing a personal DRep Treasury Rule Book

Participation44
Reactions30
Last activity1mo ago
InputEndorsersDRep1mo agoPost #1

I've been working on a personal DRep Treasury Rule Book to help me assess treasury withdrawal requests.

I've been working on it in iterations, it started from a strictly commercial rule book (geared towards commercial proposals only), but I've evolved it iteratively to a version 17 that now represents a Unified Commercial, Infrastructure, Marketing and Public-Goods Edition.

Of course, it is biased towards weighting elements that I wanted to be included, so that is why I call it a personal DRep Treasury Rule Book.

However, it might have value for proposers as well, as it might demonstrate some factors that I will (or I wish to) weight when approving proposals.

It is open to everyone to use as a skeleton and to modify, edit, copy, adapt, shorten, extend or just ignore... without the need for any attribution or any permission.

Sharing the link below:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ed-IkSj4tDqys3D1jDMspgIZ7O9xSmxQsMPpB_b3DXA/edit?tab=t.0

Cite
ADAtainmentDRep1mo agoPost #2

Thanks for sharing. I haven't gotten through it all yet. Would you prefer feedback directly in the document or rather here?

Cite
LourdeDRep1mo agoPost #3

This is now on my to do list , I believe there may be need of a manual for much of the governance we have, ie. Things to consider or a check list available to use.

Cite
StygDRep1mo agoPost #4

After reviewing your rulebook, and running my own diagnostic on it, I used it as a test case to backfill a gap in my own analysis of TWD proposals (I do not directly evaluate fiscal value). When I ran the diagnostic on it, it showed that your capital-stewardship path arrived at the same place my unrelated rights-derivation work arrived at. When I ran your rulebook against a proposal, the same thing happened, convergence from two separate frameworks, focused on two separate disciplines, which surfaced key insights.

Its in section 2.7 of my rationale if you want to see what I mean for a specific proposal. (Note: you said no attribution needed, but I tagged you anyways. Just good citation hygiene.)

Cite