Net Change Limit of 300 Million ADA for Epochs 613–713
167 DReps voted · 71 with a rationale · 6 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes45.8K ₳Rationale
Wistkey Lab votes YES on the 300M ADA Net Change Limit.
The NCL defines the maximum potential treasury withdrawal for the period but does not authorize spending. Establishing this limit ensures governance continuity while allowing DReps to evaluate individual treasury withdrawal proposals on their merits.
We view the 300M ADA cap as a cautious and reasonable boundary, broadly aligned with the previous year’s treasury inflows and lower than the earlier 350M proposal. In the current market environment, fiscal discipline is important to protect ADA holders while still enabling necessary ecosystem investment.
Supporting this NCL does not imply support for increased spending. Wistkey Lab will continue to apply strict scrutiny to treasury withdrawal proposals and prioritize funding for neutral public infrastructure that delivers clear ecosystem-wide value.
- No45.2K ₳No rationale
- Yes43.1K ₳Rationale
Decentralization doesn’t mean unlimited spending. It means rules that we choose. A cap aligned with historical inflows encourages responsible governance while still leaving the decisions in the hands of voters.
- No29.3K ₳No rationale
- Abstain28.2K ₳No rationale
- Abstain26.7K ₳Rationale
Probably not going to pass so I abstain on this one.
- Yes25.7K ₳No rationale
- No15.2K ₳No rationale
- Abstain8.1K ₳No rationale
- No6.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes4.4K ₳No rationale
- No1.2K ₳Rationale
300 Million Ada is still too high and the only argument I've seen is that the price of Ada is lower and so we need a higher NCL at this time to spend on our future. And then in that future the price will be higher, and we can spend less Ada. It is a good argument but financially we cannot continue down this path as we will run out of funds in 4 years at this rate. We need a lower NCL now before its too late. We have spent so much on integrations and are still getting more. 250 Million Ada or lower makes more sense, and balances between the extremes of wanting to spend barely any Ada, and those who want to spend 300-350 million which is nearly a quarter of the treasury. I want us to try again once more for a lower NCL. Its not asking for much to suggest 250M.
- Yes153.7 ₳No rationale
- Yes123.6 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale
- No0 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale