DRepActive

Latam Cardano

drep1ytgs...sqgnpf2w

850,273 ₳850.3K ₳voting power

47 delegators0.02% of active voting power

About

Objectives

Objectives: Prioritize user trust, security, and accessibility of the blockchain. Strengthen Cardano's resilience via decentralization, immutability, security, scalability, and interoperability. Drive LatAm growth by increasing transactions, builders, users, institutional adoption, and public awareness. Champion Cardano's long-term viability.

Read moreShow less

Motivations

Safeguard user trust, ensuring Cardano's longevity. Strengthen resilience through core principles. Amplify LatAm's voice in global governance. Leverage Cardano for positive impact in LatAm, addressing real-world challenges.

Qualifications

Operating since Nov 2021, we bring expertise to the DRep role. We were key contributors to CIP 1694, Minimum Viable Governance, drafted constitution, and aided ratification. Members hold Intersect MBO roles. We delivered Education, Marketing, and tooling initiatives. We are technically savvy, with experience in governance, development, and community building, dedicated to Cardano's success.

Read moreShow less

Governance record

Participation84%Voted on 125 of 149 concluded actionsAhead of 75% of 295 active DReps
Votes with rationale85%106 of 125 votes with rationaleAhead of 80% of 293 active DReps with votes
Vote timingDay 10.9Median point after submission across 125 timed votes
Voting pattern
125votes
  • Yes85 (68%)
  • No36 (29%)
  • Abstain4 (3%)

No vote changes

Percentiles compare active DReps with at least five concluded actions since their registration. What these numbers mean

Voting power trend3.8%vs last epoch
828.1K ₳884K ₳46Epoch 648Epoch 663828.1K ₳884K ₳46Epoch 648Epoch 663
2.3%over 16 epochsDelegators46+3over 16 epochs

Recognition (11)

Hello Governance
Lone Voice
Shows the Work
Silver
Identified
Hard Fork Voter
Veteran
View all 11 badges

Activity

Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.

Cant find any difference from the previous proposal so maintaining our NO vote. We support the reumbursment of the deposit, not of the rewards. The time...

It's a good idea to provide some buffer by keeping the CC size at 7 but having the minimum at 5. This provides the community the opportunity to react and...

We support the refund but we are voting NO for two reasons: 1- It is unclear the author is the legitimate recipient. The Gov Action should clearly state...

On-chain profile details

DRep ID
drep1ytgs...sqgnpf2w
Payment address
addr1q99h...us54kekr
Registered since
Mar 20, 2025
Last metadata update
1y ago
Data freshness
On-chain data as of 1d ago