DRepTalk
Sign in
Enter as DRepEnter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Governance ActionsDiscussionsTreasuryDRepsAnalyticsReview
Sign in
More ways to sign in
Enter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Install app
DRepActive

ranket

drep1ygj6...cq7fe4vs

96,029,395 ₳96M ₳voting power

190 delegators1.91% of active voting power

About

Objectives

I am an active physical researcher and a Doctor of Science. As a researcher who can be active on the world's front lines, I will do my best to ensure that academic-based Cardano can grow without taking high risks.

Motivations

A certain period of time has passed since the start of DRep, and I decided to run to convey the voices of delegators that cannot be picked up by the current PR. This policy is to avoid negotiations such as delegation competition with other DRep. Regarding Cardano activities, he has been active as a stake pool operator and has also worked on many projects at Catalyst. Basically, we are working on a project that is sustainable and provides a long-term product that serves as a prototype for Cardano's use cases.

Read moreShow less

Qualifications

There are over 70 papers. The most cited papers have more than 500 citations. He has also received numerous academic awards in scientific field. Also more than 10 catalyst projects.

Governance record

Participation97%Voted on 141 of 145 concluded actionsAhead of 91% of 351 active DReps
Votes with rationale6%9 of 144 votes with rationaleAhead of 48% of 334 active DReps with votes
Vote timingDay 10.7Median point after submission across 144 timed votes
Voting pattern
144votes
  • Yes109 (76%)
  • No13 (9%)
  • Abstain22 (15%)

Changed vote on 9 actions9 changes total

Percentiles compare active DReps with at least five concluded actions since their registration. What these numbers mean

Voting power trend10.5%vs last epoch
17.5M ₳96M ₳185Epoch 541Epoch 654
449.5%over 114 epochsDelegators185+56over 8 epochs

Recognition (8)

Lone Voice
Hard Fork Voter
Veteran
View all 8 badges

Activity

Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.

YesWithdraw 120,000,000 ada for AlphaGrowth’s Cardano PRIMEDecided epoch 650View rationaleEnacted1mo ago

I know that there is a potential conflict for NCL problem. However, even though this vote becomes to info action like, I would like to put YES for this proposal.
Reason 1 : This action was agreed by Charles in SNS. My main delegetors are almost always to encourage to Chales opinion.
Reason 2 : The centralized tactics is necessary for present Cardano situation. Therefore, such kind of large promotion should be performed by powerful partner like they.

From these reason, I put Yes in early stage of voting term and also put almost first priority to this. It would be affected to other GA until NCL voting make a result.

YesIO & VacuumLabs: Enhancing Plutus - Performance, Correctness, and UsabilityDecided epoch 634View rationaleEnacted4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

YesIO: Cardano High Assurance Technical CollaborationDecided epoch 634View rationaleEnacted4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

YesIO & Midgard Labs: L2 Scalability InitiativeDecided epoch 633View rationaleExpired4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

YesIO & Ensurable Systems: Cardano Maintenance InitiativeDecided epoch 634View rationaleEnacted4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

Show 4 moreShow less
YesIO: Consensus InitiativeDecided epoch 634View rationaleEnacted4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

YesIO: Cardano UpgradesDecided epoch 634View rationaleEnacted4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

YesIO: Developer Experience InitiativeDecided epoch 634View rationaleEnacted4mo ago

there is the practical issue that there is no developer that can fully absorb the risk of ADA price fluctuations. I am aware of concerns regarding the speed of development, etc. However, I believe that this would only be the case if an alternative development group with a proven track record were to propose it. In some cases, it is possible that the new group could negotiate with IO and Charles after the proposal is approved.

AbstainDingo: a Production-Grade Block Producer in Go by Blink LabsDecided epoch 625View rationaleEnacted5mo ago

Proposal itself is good. Therefore, I don't like to vete No. However, the importance of this proposal for the current Cardano situation is not reached to vote Yes. So I want to put abstain vote in present.

On-chain profile details

DRep ID
drep1ygj6...cq7fe4vs
Payment address
addr1q8rs...nqr7g3za
Registered since
Feb 15, 2025
Last metadata update
1y ago
Data freshness
On-chain data as of 1d ago