DRepTalk
Sign in
Enter as DRepEnter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Governance ActionsDiscussionsTreasuryDRepsAnalyticsReview
Sign in
More ways to sign in
Enter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Install app

Cardano 2030: Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework and KPIs

System8mo ago1 post
DReps 191SPOs 47CC 7

4 of 7 committee members voted

  • Ace Alliance71aa5b3a…8f04
    YesActive · term ends epoch 726Rationale

    Ace Alliance finds the proposed “Cardano 2030: Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework and KPIs” Info Action Constitutional. We assess the constitutionality of the Action, not the merits of referenced materials

    A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.

    Ace Alliance finds this Info Action, an on-chain poll for DReps, Constitutional. We assess the constitutionality of the Info Action, not the merits of the Cardano Product Committee’s “Cardano 2030: Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework and KPIs.” While Constitutional Committee members may not prevent Info Actions from being recorded on chain, they may express their views on whether the actions proposed within an Info Action would be constitutional if implemented by on-chain mechanisms (Article VII, Section 4).

    Ace Alliance finds this “Cardano 2030: Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework and KPIs” Info Action Constitutional. The Action, an on-chain poll for DReps, adheres to the requirements of Article VII.

  • Cardano Japan Council725d4d44…7b31
    YesExpired · term ends epoch 653Rationale

    We consider this governance action to be constitutional.

    This proposal is an Information (Info) Action intended to share the Cardano 2030 Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework, and KPIs with the community. It does not entail any protocol changes, constitutional amendments, treasury withdrawals, nor does it impose any legally binding effect on future voting behavior. The proposal satisfies the submission requirements set forth in Article III, Section 5 of the Cardano Constitution, and is therefore considered constitutional.

    For the reasons stated above, we determine that it is constitutional.

  • Eastern Cardano Council2ea7a78e…10ec
    AbstainActive · term ends epoch 726Rationale

    We have determined that this Info action does not meet the criteria deemed necessary for the Constitutional Committee to assess its constitutionality.

    Article VII, Section 1 of the Cardano Constitution states "The Constitutional Committee shall comprise a set of owners of ada that is collectively responsible for ensuring that on-chain governance actions prior to enactment on-chain, are constitutional."

    Additionally; Article VII, Section 4, Paragraph 2 states "Because "Info" actions have no on-chain effect and, accordingly, are neither constitutional nor unconstitutional, Constitutional Committee members may not prevent "Info" actions from being recorded on-chain. Members of the Constitutional Committee may nevertheless record a vote on-chain regarding an "Info" action in order to express their view on such "Info" action, including whether the suggested course of action proposed in such "Info" action, would be, in the view of such member, unconstitutional if it were to be enforced by on-chain mechanisms."

    Finally; Article VII, Section 4, Paragraph 3 states "In the case of "Info" actions that propose a Cardano Blockchain ecosystem budget, Constitutional Committee members shall record a vote on-chain that sets forth their opinion as to whether the proposed budget, if it were to be implemented in the form contained in the "Info" action, would violate this Constitution."

    The governance action with ID "gov_action18fd...8cqks4" and title "Cardano 2030: Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework and KPIs", as an Info governance action, does not relate to a budget proposal, nor does it gauge sentiment towards another type of governance action which could be enacted on-chain, so the Constitutional Committee is not empowered to assess its constitutionality, ensuring DReps and SPOs are the only ones able to influence its outcome.

    We therefore Abstain.

    We abstain from assessing the constitutionality of this governance action.

  • Tingvard646d1b3a…be43
    AbstainActive · term ends epoch 726Rationale

    Tingvard vote abstain on this Info Action while expressing support for its intent and the process behind it.

    This governance action is correctly submitted as an Info Action under Article VII, §4 of the Cardano Constitution. As such, it has no on-chain effect, creates no binding obligations, and cannot alter governance thresholds, treasury authority, or constitutional interpretation. For this reason, Tingvard does not treat this action as a constitutional matter requiring a “constitutional” or “unconstitutional” determination.
    The proposal presents a comprehensive, community-led articulation of a long-term Vision, Mission, Strategy Framework, and associated KPIs for the Cardano ecosystem. Tingvard recognizes and supports the extensive and inclusive process followed by the Product Committee, including broad community engagement, structured feedback loops, and transparent documentation. The outcome provides a coherent strategic narrative that may serve as a useful reference point for ecosystem discussions, governance deliberations, and future proposals.
    At the same time, because this action is informational in nature, Tingvard considers it inappropriate to express approval or rejection through a binding governance signal. Strategic visions derive practical significance only through subsequent governance actions—such as budgets, treasury withdrawals, or parameter updates—which must each be evaluated independently on their own merits and constitutional compliance. Abstention therefore reflects a neutral constitutional posture, rather than opposition or lack of support.

    Tingvard abstains from voting on this Info Actions constitutionality. The proposal is appropriately framed as informational, demonstrates a strong and inclusive community process, and offers a useful strategic reference for future governance discussions. Abstention reflects Tingvard’s view that strategic direction should inform, but not preempt or bind, future governance decisions, which must each be assessed independently under the Cardano Constitution.

  • Cardano Curia84feba94…6bd5
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 799No rationale
  • KtorZ64f97568…3a49
    Not votedExpired · term ends epoch 653No rationale
  • Phil_uplc68bb0b42…8746
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 799No rationale