DRepTalk
Sign in
Enter as DRepEnter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Governance ActionsDiscussionsTreasuryDRepsAnalyticsReview
Sign in
More ways to sign in
Enter as delegatorEnter as SPOEnter as CC memberEnter as proposerRegister as DRep
Install app

Cardano in Oceania: A community-led strategic plan for investing in growth.

System1y ago1 post
DReps 162SPOs 8CC 7

6 of 7 committee members voted

  • Ace Alliance71aa5b3a…8f04
    YesActive · term ends epoch 726Rationale

    The proposed "Cardano in Oceania" Info Action is Constitutional. The action adheres to procedural requirements for governance actions and correctly establishes a framework for a budget that is compliant with the constitutional requirements.

    A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.

    This Info Action (gov_action13836fuy3yttxn4hkeqka398q9qnwsjtmul4sxc3nht7qae8uvejsqm7ukh8) proposes a Cardano Blockchain Ecosystem Budget of 778,000 ada to fund a strategic plan for Cardano's ecosystem growth in the Oceania region. Our review confirms that the governance action’s structure and content aligns with the requirements set forth in the Cardano Constitution.

    Constitutional Alignment

    The governance action aligns with the constitutional framework for the following reasons:

    • Procedural Requirements (Article III, Section 5): The action is well-documented and follows the mandated format. It provides sufficient rationale and uses immutable IPFS and Git commit hashes to ensure the verifiability of all supporting materials, satisfying the constitution's transparency requirements.
    • Funds Administration (Article IV): The proposal meets all substantive requirements for establishing a budget. It specifies an administrator, outlines a process for milestone-based oversight, and makes provision for an independent auditor.
    • Funds Handling (Article IV, Section 5): The proposal meets funds handling requirements. For any ada received from subsequent treasury withdrawals, the proposers commit to not delegate to an SPO and delegate to the predefined auto abstain DRep. This ensures neutrality and adheres to constitutional safeguards.

    Due to its adherence to constitutional provisions under Articles III and IV, this Info Action is Constitutional.

  • Cardano Atlantic Council07e0eb70…5bde
    YesResigned · term ends epoch 653Rationale

    This governance action, as proposed, is Constitutional.

    The proposal titled "Cardano in Oceania: A community-led strategic plan for investing in growth." is constitutional. Per our constitutionality review, all relevant articles, guardrails, and other requirements of constitutionality were met.

  • Cardano Japan Council725d4d44…7b31
    YesExpired · term ends epoch 653Rationale unavailable
  • Eastern Cardano Council2ea7a78e…10ec
    YesActive · term ends epoch 726Rationale

    We have determined that this budget Info governance action is constitutional.

    Article IV, Section 2 of the Cardano Constitution states "Cardano Blockchain budgets shall specify a process for overseeing use of funds from Cardano Blockchain treasury withdrawals including designating one or more administrators who shall be responsible for such oversight."

    The governance action with ID "gov_action1383...m7ukh8" and title "Cardano in Oceania: A community-led strategic plan for investing in growth", as a budget Info governance action, designates "selfdriven Services" as the administrator responsible for overseeing the use of funds and specifies a process for overseeing the use of funds from the Cardano Blockchain treasury withdrawals.

    We therefore find this governance action Constitutional.

    This governance action sufficiently fulfils the criteria specified for budgets in the Cardano Constitution, so is deemed constitutional.

  • KtorZ64f97568…3a49
    YesExpired · term ends epoch 653Rationale

    LGTM 👍

    A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.

    The (budget) proposal is well structured and does not appear to violate the constitution whatsoever.

    I regret the lack of authors (and signatures from them) in the attached rationale making it hard to then tie the budget proposal back to the (future) withdrawals.

    Visible efforts are being done to provide additional details in a somewhat immutable fashion (website source given, with verifiable commit hash and history).

    Note also that the proposal mentions a provision for an independent auditor, which is indeed reflected in the budget advertised on that companion website.

  • Tingvard646d1b3a…be43
    YesActive · term ends epoch 726Rationale

    Tingvard judge the Oceania 2025–2026 budget Info action constitutional.

    This proposal is properly classified as a budget Info action (Article III.4, Article IV.1). It specifies duration, objectives, and supporting materials, with hashes and URLs provided for immutability in line with Article III.5. The budget administration process identifies an accountable administrator (Selfdriven Services), sets out milestone-based disbursement, transparent reporting, dispute resolution, and provision for independent audits, thereby meeting Articles IV.2–IV.4. Custody requirements are met by delegating treasury addresses to the Auto-Abstain DRep and abstaining from SPO delegation (Article IV.5). The proposal does not exceed constitutional boundaries and aligns with the Tenets of Article I by promoting decentralisation, inclusion, fairness, and sustainability.

    Tingvard finds this governance action constitutional. It conforms to Articles III.4, III.5, and IV.1–5, respects the Cardano Blockchain Tenets of fairness, sustainability, and decentralisation, and complies with the budget Info action framework.

  • Phil_uplc68bb0b42…8746
    Not votedExpired · term ends epoch 653No rationale