Increase Transaction and Block Memory Units (Part 1 of 2)
395 SPOs voted · 15 with a rationale · 7 changed their vote · 2 re-voted unchanged
Open a row to read the rationale.
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- NoRationale
私は、Cardanoが50年、100年と長期にわたって継続する分散型ネットワークであることを重視しています。その観点から、重要なプロトコル・パラメータ変更については、将来においても当該変更の技術的理由や判断根拠を十分に振り返ることができる形で、検証可能性が適切に確保されていることが重要であると考えています。本提案では、提案本文自体も技術的根拠の一部を構成している一方で、技術的根拠の重要な部分の多くが、将来的に参照困難となり得る外部ウェブサイトや YouTube 動画へのリンクに依存しています。例えば、性能評価やベンチマーク結果、技術的検討内容について、外部ウェブサイトや動画への参照に留めるのではなく、それらの内容を IPFS 等の不変な形式で保存・参照可能とする方法、あるいは、提案本文において十分な技術的詳細を記載し、文書自体を自己完結的なものとする方法 も考えられたはずです。このような形で長期的な検証可能性がより強固に確保されていれば、重要なパラメータ変更として、より望ましいガバナンスアクションになったと考えます。そのため、本提案に対して反対票を投じる判断としました。I place strong importance on Cardano’s ability to endure as a decentralized network over the long term, potentially for 50 or 100 years. From this perspective, it is essential that, for significant protocol parameter changes, the technical reasons and decision-making basis can be sufficiently reviewed in the future and that verifiability is properly ensured.While the proposal text itself constitutes part of the technical justification, many of the most important elements of the technical rationale rely on links to external websites and YouTube videos that may become difficult to reference over time.For example, rather than relying solely on references to external websites or videos for performance evaluations, benchmarking results, and technical analyses, these materials could have been preserved and referenced in immutable formats such as IPFS and included as part of the proposal.Had long-term verifiability been more robustly ensured in this manner, the proposal would have represented a more desirable governance action for a parameter change of this significance. For these reasons, I have decided to vote against this proposal.
- AbstainNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale