Update Constitutional Committee 2026
Discussed in the Governance Review for epochs 650 to 652.
338 SPOs voted · 14 with a rationale · 1 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- YesNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesRationale
YES - Update Constitutional Committee 2026.
We vote yes to update the constitutional committee for a few reasons. Firstly the 4 committee seats that are expiring need to be filled so governance continues as planned, this rotation is fundamental to the continued operation of the CC, staggering the seat rotations, and builds on the work done by community workshops for the last 2 years. Secondly these candidates were elected in the 2026 Constitutional Committee election by means of a community votes and we support their work and respect the election outcomes, albeit the continued low turnouts from the community for these elections, this is still by far the most inclusive path we have in Cardano for updating the constitutional committee.
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesRationale
I vote yes, acknowledging the proposed CC change, according to the elections facilitated through Intersect.
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale