Withdraw ₳266,667 for Cexplorer.io -- Developer-Focused Blockchain Explorer...
168 DReps voted · 56 with a rationale · 4 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes55.9K ₳No rationale
- No50.5K ₳No rationale
- Yes49.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes48.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes46.5K ₳Rationale
I voted YES on all 39 Governance Actions — 39 times, 39 votes.
Since I supported these during Ekklesia and saw no major changes or conflicts of interest, I stand by those decisions now. For proposals with large budgets, I paid extra attention to the justification and scope. Voting isn’t just a click — it’s a responsibility. I own mine, for myself and for our CASIA community.
- Yes45.2K ₳No rationale
- Yes36.3K ₳No rationale
- Yes36.3K ₳Rationale
✅ Vote: YES — Cexplorer.io: Developer-Centric Explorer for Cardano
I’m voting YES to fund Cexplorer.io — one of the most powerful, real-time blockchain explorers built for the Cardano ecosystem.
🔍 Why it matters:
Cardano lacks a truly developer-focused explorer with rich analytics, fast infrastructure, and on-chain insights. Cexplorer.io solves this — serving over 50,000 monthly users and powering millions of data requests.🛠️ This proposal ensures:
• Ongoing infrastructure + server reliability
• Feature expansion & UI/UX redesign
• Support for developers, SPOs, researchers, and users
• Scalable, high-performance blockchain indexing
• Long-term platform sustainability🧠 Built by the original Adapools team, the platform supports dApp builders, stake pool monitoring, and anyone who needs to understand Cardano’s on-chain activity in depth.
🔐 Treasury funds are managed by smart contracts (Sundae Labs) + oversight from Cardano Foundation, NMKR, Xerberus, and others to ensure transparent, secure disbursements.
🔗 Ekklesia Proposal
🔗 GovTool Action
🔗 Smart Contract BlogReliable data infrastructure is foundational for growth, and this proposal delivers on that.
#Cardano #OpenGov #Cexplorer #Governance #Transparency #DAppDev #VoteYES
- Yes26.7K ₳Rationale
Cexplorer has consistently provided a good service over the years. It is a public good that should be funded.
- No14.3K ₳No rationale
- Yes6.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes4.8K ₳No rationale
- Yes335.3 ₳No rationale
- Yes13.5 ₳No rationale
- Yes6.3 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale