ACL-CardanoLand

The multi-year structure (2026–2028) locks up a significant portion of treasury capital in advance, during volatile economic environments, it is safer to fund infrastructure via shorter, annualized cycles rather than multi-year mandates.

Yes for marketing

Yes , need some marketing and presence.

Big Yes, need some marketing !

High ask, a more conservative approach warrants starting with smaller, milestone-gated pilot funding rounds rather than an immediate top-tier capital injection

Data indexing providers are private entities and should use paid SaaS user models.

Integrates optimization CIPs to replace gas-heavy on-chain loops with direct built-ins.

Important for adoption

Required for improving the finality and to be considered for Defi adoption, 2 hours of finality is not acceptable for any network.

Important for Cardano's sustainability.

This proposal focuses on Leios, which delivers the throughput capacity Cardano bypreserving Cardano’s security guarantees while dramatically improving performance which is must for adoption.

(WS1) provides the ledger-level account primitives that underpin CPS-23 Multi-asset Treasury design (WS2). Babel Fees (WS3) operates at the application layer on top of the separately funded CIP-118 Nested Transactions primitive, enabling fee payment in any native asset which is important for adoption.

Critical Infrastructure: Essential for maintaining the CLI, SDKs, and core tooling necessary to attract and retain dApp developers.

As a DRep, I voted ✅YES on this proposal.

It sets a maximum treasury withdrawal limit for 2025—not a requirement to spend the full amount.

This acts as a guardrail, while DReps still vote on each individual budget/withdrawal request. I support this to help move forward with treasury planning.