DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (₳1,500,000)
On-chain changes
Informational action. No on-chain effect; the vote signals opinion only.
Abstract
This Budget Info Action asks DReps and the Cardano community to signal support for a ₳1,500,000, 6-month budget to harden and scale DeltaDeFi, a Hydra-based, low-latency order-book exchange aiming to become core trading infrastructure for Cardano, focused on ADA and Cardano native tokens (CNTs).
The requested budget is intended to:
- Bring the current Hydra spot DEX from beta to a production-ready venue for both API traders and everyday users;
- Scale the Hydra and data infrastructure so Cardano has at least one CEX-grade venue for ADA and key CNT pairs; and
- Deliver a Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme (baseline report + live dashboard + progress report) that tracks DeFi infrastructure contribution to ecosystem goals.
Within the ₳1,500,000 total:
- 80% is dedicated to engineering, operations and security for the Hydra trading infrastructure; and
- 20% is dedicated to the Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme:
- an initial "State of Cardano DeFi" baseline report,
- a public Vision 2030 KPI dashboard, and
- a final 6-month progress report
Motivation & rationale
Why this matters for Cardano, ADA and CNT holders
Cardano currently lacks a low-latency order-book venue that can:
- Support API-driven trading, arbitrage and market-making at scale;
- Offer tight spreads and low slippage in key ADA–stable and ADA–CNT markets; and
- Provide a clear, measurable picture of how competitive Cardano is as an L1 for trading compared with other ecosystems and CEXs.
Today, most Cardano trading happens on AMM-style DEXs. They are great for simple swaps, but they are not optimised for:
- Low-fee, low-slippage execution at size in core ADA and CNT pairs;
- Instant, predictable fills for API and bot-driven strategies; or
- Professional market-makers and arbitrageurs who expect CEX-like order-book behaviour.
DeltaDeFi is designed to fill this gap: a Hydra-based, low-latency order-book with tight spreads, fast matching and first-class API support, so that ADA and CNT liquidity can be deployed efficiently and Cardano can compete more directly with order-book venues on other chains and on CEXs.
A performant, observable exchange is therefore not just another dApp, but part of Cardano’s core infrastructure. It supports the Constitution’s emphasis on future development of the ecosystem by making Cardano a more attractive base layer for capital, traders, and applications built around ADA and CNTs.
Why Hydra and why DeltaDeFi
Hydra offers the latency and UX profile needed for modern trading but is still under-represented in production-grade, user-facing protocols. DeltaDeFi is:
- A Hydra-based, low-latency order-book DEX already live in beta on mainnet;
- Built by a team with an existing track record in:
- high-frequency trading tooling,
- Cardano SDKs and infrastructure, and
- Project Catalyst delivery; and
- Focused on spot trading and API-driven participants, where reliable execution and transparent metrics matter most.
Earlier Project Catalyst funding helped bootstrap the current codebase and beta deployment with relatively modest budgets. This proposal is intended to take that work from "working beta" to robust, measurable infrastructure for the whole ecosystem.
Team Background
DeltaDeFi is built by the same team behind SIDAN Lab, with a multi-year track record in the Cardano ecosystem:
- MeshJS Core Maintainers: The team maintains MeshJS, the largest TypeScript SDK in the Cardano ecosystem, used by numerous dApps and developers for wallet integration, transaction building, and smart contract interaction.
- Stake Pool Operators & DReps: Single SPO (SIDAN) since 2021 and an active DRep in Cardano governance.
- Cardano Hong Kong Community: Active contributors to the Cardano HK community, organizing meetups, workshops, and developer education initiatives.
- Open Source Commitment: Consistent delivery of open-source tooling and infrastructure, with MeshJS serving as critical developer infrastructure across the ecosystem.
- Extensive open source footprint - 47 public repositories on GitHub including multi-language Cardano SDKs: Whisky (Rust), Vodka (Aiken), Rum (Go), and Gin (Python), all Apache-2.0 licensed
- Project Catalyst Track Record: Multiple successfully delivered Catalyst projects spanning SDK development, developer tooling, and infrastructure.
This background in developer tooling and infrastructure directly informs DeltaDeFi's approach: building robust, well-documented, API-first trading infrastructure that other projects can integrate with.
Direct relevance to ADA and CNT holders
From the point of view of ADA and CNT holders, the key questions are:
How expensive is it to move size on Cardano?
Slippage plus fees for 1k / 10k / 100k ADA trades in core pairs such as ADA/USDM.How well aligned are ADA and major CNT prices across DEXs and with CEX prices?
Price gaps between on-chain venues and a simple CEX reference.How fragmented and inconsistent are CNT markets across Cardano DEXs?
Differences in price, depth and execution quality for the same tokens on different venues.
Today, answering these questions requires stitching together multiple tools and APIs. As part of this budget, DeltaDeFi will:
- Deliver tighter, deeper markets on at least one Hydra-based venue; and
- Publish a Vision 2030 KPI dashboard so ADA and CNT holders can track, in numbers, whether Cardano is progressing toward its DeFi vertical goals.
6-Month Roadmap and Scope
Over the 6-month budget period, the work is grouped into three tightly scoped tracks.
1. Hardening the Hydra spot DEX
Goal: move the existing beta mainnet exchange to a production-grade trading venue.
Key activities:
- Improve matching engine robustness, latency and failure-mode handling on Hydra;
- Strengthen risk controls, monitoring and incident response for production use;
- Complete security reviews and targeted audits of critical components (on-chain scripts, Hydra integration);
- Improve API stability, documentation and sandbox environments so professional traders and bots can integrate with confidence; and
- Deliver and maintain a public status page for uptime and incident reporting.
Outcome: Cardano has a live, hardened Hydra spot DEX that can realistically serve as a primary venue for order-book trading in ADA and key CNT pairs.
2. Scaling infrastructure and integrations
Goal: ensure DeltaDeFi is usable and visible as infrastructure, not only as a stand-alone app.
Key activities:
- Scale Hydra and indexing infrastructure to handle growing order and volume loads;
- Improve wallet and protocol integrations, making it easy for users and other Cardano dApps to use DeltaDeFi as a liquidity source;
- Extend markets to include other pairs, and selected CNT pairs where depth and tight spreads matter; and
- Design the platform so that AI-driven liquidity agents and automated trading systems can integrate via APIs in future roadmap phases, without adding complexity to this budget period.
Outcome: DeltaDeFi functions as a reliable, API-friendly trading venue that Cardano projects, CNT issuers and larger participants can build on.
3. Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme
Goal: make DeltaDeFi's contribution to Vision 2030 goals measurable and tie the benefit of this budget to ecosystem-wide KPIs.
This track is detailed below. 20% of the total budget is explicitly reserved for its delivery and is payable at the end of the 6-month period.
Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme
To make the impact of this budget visible against Cardano Vision 2030 goals, DeltaDeFi will deliver:
- An initial baseline report measuring current DeFi KPIs;
- A public Vision 2030 KPI dashboard; and
- A final 6-month report assessing progress toward Vision 2030 targets.
1. Initial "State of Cardano DeFi" report (baseline)
Early in the budget period, DeltaDeFi will publish a baseline measuring Cardano's current position against Vision 2030 DeFi vertical goals ("institutional-grade liquidity and usable Cardano-native DeFi").
Scope: ADA/USDM pair across top 3 Cardano DEXs, benchmarked against top 3 ADA CEXs.
| Vision 2030 KPI Area | Baseline Metrics |
|---|---|
| DeFi Vertical | Slippage, spread, depth for 1k/10k/100k ADA; CEX price gap |
| Adoption (TVL) | Current DeFi TVL across measured venues |
| Adoption (MAU) | Active trading addresses |
CNT Market Quality: Price discrepancies for major CNTs across DEXs vs CEX benchmarks.
Suggested Targets: The report will propose governance-grade targets aligned with Vision 2030:
- Target slippage/cost ranges for "institutional-grade" execution;
- Desired spread and depth levels; and
- CNT price alignment expectations.
Where data access is limited, limitations will be documented.
2. Public Vision 2030 KPI Dashboard
DeltaDeFi will build and maintain a public dashboard structured around the Cardano Vision 2030 KPIs, making DeFi infrastructure contribution to ecosystem goals measurable and transparent.
Adoption KPIs (Vision 2030: TVL $3B, MAU 1M, Transactions ≥27M/month)
| Metric | Scope | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total Value Locked | DeltaDeFi | Locked value in DeltaDeFi contracts |
| Monthly Active Users | DeltaDeFi + Cross-DEX | Unique trading addresses with historical trends |
| Trading Volume | DeltaDeFi + Cross-DEX | Daily/monthly matched order volume |
| Transaction Count | DeltaDeFi | Contribution to Cardano transaction throughput |
DeFi Vertical KPIs (Vision 2030: "Institutional-grade liquidity and usable DeFi")
| Metric | Scope | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Slippage (1k/10k/100k ADA) | Top 3 DEXs + DeltaDeFi | Execution cost at standard trade sizes |
| Depth within ±1% | Top 3 DEXs + DeltaDeFi | Available liquidity near mid-price |
| CEX Price Gap | Cross-DEX vs Top 3 CEXs | Deviation from CEX reference mid |
| Bid-Ask Spread | DeltaDeFi | Average spread for ADA/USDM |
Scalability KPIs (Vision 2030: L2 Integration, 3x Throughput)
| Metric | Scope | Description |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Settlement Transactions | DeltaDeFi | L1 txs attributable to DeltaDeFi Hydra activity |
| L1 Fees Generated | DeltaDeFi | Protocol revenue contribution from settlements |
| L2 Transaction Ratio | DeltaDeFi | Hydra txs vs L1 settlements (scaling efficiency) |
Dashboard Features
- Baseline comparison toggle: Compare current metrics against initial report
- Historical trends: Track KPI progress over the 6-month period
3. Final 6-month Vision 2030 Progress Report
At the end of the 6-month period, DeltaDeFi will publish a Vision 2030 progress report assessing DeFi infrastructure advancement:
| Assessment Area | Comparison |
|---|---|
| DeFi Vertical KPIs | Baseline vs current slippage, spread, depth, CEX gap |
| Adoption KPIs | TVL and MAU growth over period |
| Scalability KPIs | L1 footprint and L2 transaction efficiency |
| Suggested Targets | Actual vs proposed targets from baseline |
The report will comment on:
- Progress toward Vision 2030 DeFi vertical goals;
- Remaining gaps and recommended next steps; and
- Lessons for future Treasury-funded DeFi infrastructure.
The budget reserved for this programme (baseline report, dashboard and final report) is payable at the end of the 6-month period upon delivery and DAC sign-off.
Fund Release Schedule
Funds will be released in three phases over the 6-month project duration:
| Phase | Amount | % of Total | Release Date | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | ₳560,000 | 37.3% | Project Start | ₳560,000 |
| Phase 2 | ₳560,000 | 37.3% | End of Month 3 | ₳1,120,000 |
| Phase 3 | ₳380,000 | 25.3% | End of Month 6 | ₳1,500,000 |
Release Approval Mechanism
Fund releases are governed by the DeltaDeFi Administration Committee (DAC) as defined in the Administration section below.
Safeguard: Fund Return Policy
If the DAC multisig (4-of-6) votes to stop the project:
- The project will be immediately suspended.
- All remaining funds will be returned to the Cardano Treasury.
- A public report detailing the reason for suspension will be published within 14 days.
Any unused funds from completed phases will also be returned to the Treasury at project conclusion.
Budget and Administration
Total budget: ₳1,500,000 over 6 months. Breakdown:
- ₳1,120,000 – Hydra trading infrastructure
- Core engineering for the matching engine, API, Hydra integration and indexers;
- Operations, infra and security (hosting, monitoring, incident response);
- Wallet and protocol integrations and production support.
- ₳280,000 – Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme
- Initial "State of Cardano DeFi" baseline report;
- Public Vision 2030 KPI dashboard implementation and maintenance;
- Final 6-month Vision 2030 progress report.
- ₳100,000 – Administration and independent audit
- Administration multisig operations (transaction fees, bookkeeping, reporting);
- Independent financial and technical audits of funded work and spending;
- Preparation and publication of audit summaries for the community.
Administration committee and multisig
A future Treasury Withdrawal GA based on this Info Action will specify a DeltaDeFi Administration Committee (DAC) as the administrator for the budget. The intended DAC composition is as below:
DeltaDeFi representatives:
- Hinson Wong (Co-founder of DeltaDeFi)
- Anson Chui (Co-founder of DeltaDeFi)
Ecosystem representatives:
- Mike Hornan (Cardano Ambassador / Governance Educator)
- James Meidinger (CEO, Freeblocks LLC / BizDev, USDM Moneta non-representative capacity)
- Hosky (ecosystem representative)
- Shigeki Tabira (ecosystem representative, SIPO SPO / DRep)
All Treasury-related funds and assets for this budget will be held under a 4-out-of-6 multisig controlled by the DAC. Any movement of ADA from the administration addresses (for example, milestone disbursements, payment of audit costs) will require at least four affirmative signatures out of six.
The Withdrawal GA will also specify that:
- Funds are held in segregated, publicly auditable addresses, separate from other project funds or personal wallets;
- These addresses are delegated to the auto-abstain option and never to SPOs, in line with the Constitution; and
- Funds will be released according to the Fund Release Schedule above:
- Phase 1 (₳560,000) and Phase 2 (₳560,000) cover the ₳1,120,000 infrastructure development budget;
- Phase 3 (₳380,000) covers the ₳280,000 Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme and ₳100,000 administration/audit costs, payable upon end-of-period delivery and DAC multisig sign-off.
Independent audit and review
- Part of the ₳100,000 administration and audit budget will fund an independent auditor, in line with the Cardano Constitution’s auditor requirement for Treasury-funded work.
- The Treasury Withdrawal GA will specify the auditor’s role, scope and reporting cadence, and audit results will be summarised publicly so the community can verify how funds were used.
Alignment with Cardano Vision 2030
This proposal supports multiple pillars of the Cardano Vision 2030 strategic framework.
Strategic Alignment
| Vision 2030 Priority | DeltaDeFi Contribution |
|---|---|
| Pillar 1: L2 Integration – "High-frequency, low-latency transactions with L1 security" | Production-grade Hydra trading venue proving L2 works for DeFi |
| Pillar 2: DeFi Vertical – "Institutional-grade liquidity and usable Cardano-native DeFi" | Order-book infrastructure for professional traders and market makers |
| L2 → L1 Value Retention – "Layer 2 solutions contribute value back to the L1 protocol" | Settlement fees from Hydra activity flow back to L1 |
| Scalability – "3x current throughput capacity" | Validates L2 scaling approach for high-volume use cases |
KPIs for This Proposal
Ecosystem Impact
| KPI | 6-Month Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| DeltaDeFi TVL | ≥$10M | On-chain locked value |
| Monthly Trading Volume | ≥$30M | Matched order volume |
| Active Traders (MAU) | ≥1,000 unique traders | Unique trading addresses |
| L1 Settlement Transactions | ≥5,000 txs/month | L1 txs from DeltaDeFi |
| L2 Transactions | 1M/month | Scaling efficiency |
Market Quality (per dashboard and reports)
| KPI | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| ADA/USDM Slippage (10k ADA) | ≤0.3% | Simulated execution cost |
| Bid-Ask Spread | ≤0.5% | Average spread |
| Price Gap vs CEX | ≤1% deviation | Deviation from CEX mid |
| Depth within ±1% | ≥$100k equivalent liquidity | Near-mid liquidity |
Operational
| KPI | Target |
|---|---|
| Platform Uptime | Public status page with incident reporting |
| API Availability | Documented uptime metrics and post-mortems |
| Baseline Report | Month 1-2 |
| Dashboard Live | Month 2-3 |
| Final Report | Month 6 |
Contribution to Vision 2030 KPIs
Vision 2030 defines 9 core KPIs. DeltaDeFi directly contributes to 5 of them:
| Vision 2030 KPI | Current | 2030 Target | DeltaDeFi 6-Mo Target | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVL | $200M | $3B | $10M | 0.33% |
| MAU | 100-300k | 1M | 1,000 traders | 0.10% |
| Monthly Transactions | 800k | 27M | 5,000 L1 settlements | 0.02% (L1) |
| Protocol Revenue | 3.5M ADA | ≥16M ADA | ~10k ADA/yr | 0.06% |
| Throughput Capacity | 300k/day | 3x current | 1M L2 tx/month | 5.56% |
KPIs Not Addressed: Uptime (99.98%), Voting Power Distribution, Alternative Node Clients, DRep Participation.
Throughput Contribution Analysis
The Throughput Capacity KPI is DeltaDeFi's strongest contribution. Based on Cardano's L1 theoretical maximum of 46.7M tx/month (Chainspect: 18.02 TPS), the 3x target requires closing an 18M tx/month gap. DeltaDeFi's 1M L2 transactions per month represents 5.56% of this gap via L2 scaling.
This aligns with Vision 2030's L2 integration strategy: "high-volume activity can move off L1 and settle back." DeltaDeFi demonstrates a 200:1 L2-to-L1 efficiency ratio (1M L2 transactions settled via 5,000 L1 transactions).
Budget Efficiency vs KPI Contribution
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Budget Requested | ₳1.5M |
| Estimated 5-Year Treasury | ₳1,000M (200M NCL × 5) |
| Budget Utilization | 0.15% |
Weighted KPI Contribution (equal weight across 9 KPIs):
| KPI | Contribution | Weight (1/9) | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVL | 0.33% | 11.1% | 0.037% |
| MAU | 0.10% | 11.1% | 0.011% |
| Monthly Txs | 0.02% | 11.1% | 0.002% |
| Protocol Revenue | 0.06% | 11.1% | 0.007% |
| Throughput | 5.56% | 11.1% | 0.618% |
| 4 KPIs (not addressed) | 0% | 44.4% | 0% |
| Total | 0.68% |
| Input | Output | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| 0.15% of treasury | 0.68% weighted KPI contribution | 4.5x ROI |
Constitutionality Checklist (Info Action scope)
- Purpose
- This proposal is for work intended to enhance the liquidity, usability and long-term sustainability of Cardano by providing Hydra-based trading infrastructure and transparent trading-quality metrics. It fits within Article IV.1 as a budget for the future development of the ecosystem.
- Article III.5 – On-chain governance process
- The proposal will be submitted in a clear, standard format with:
- Title, abstract, motivation and rationale; and
- A URL and content hash for this off-chain document.
- Info Action nature
- This is a Budget Info Action, not a Treasury Withdrawal:
- It does not move any ADA from the Treasury; and
- It records DRep and community sentiment on whether a ₳1,500,000, 6-month budget for DeltaDeFi Hydra trading infrastructure and market-quality metrics is desirable in principle.
- Article IV – Budgets and Treasury Withdrawals (future work)
- Any subsequent Treasury Withdrawal GA based on this Info Action will:
- Respect the Net Change Limit (NCL) in effect at the time (amount and timing);
- Specify an administrator and administration model in line with Article IV.2;
- Make explicit provision for an independent auditor and audit process in line with Article IV.4 (including dedicated budget and reporting expectations).
- Ensure funds are held in segregated, auto-abstain-delegated addresses while under administration.
Conclusion
This Budget Info Action asks whether the Cardano community supports dedicating ₳1,500,000 over 6 months to:
- Harden and scale DeltaDeFi into a production-grade Hydra trading venue for ADA and key CNT pairs; and
- Deliver a Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme with baseline report, public dashboard, and progress report tracking DeFi infrastructure contribution to ecosystem goals.
The intent is not to fund a niche application, but to strengthen Cardano's core trading infrastructure in alignment with Vision 2030's DeFi vertical ("institutional-grade liquidity and usable DeFi") and provide measurable data on progress toward ecosystem KPIs.
Voters are not yet asked to approve any withdrawals. They are asked to signal whether this direction — supporting Hydra-based trading infrastructure and Vision 2030-aligned KPI measurement — is a good use of Treasury budgeting for the next 6 months.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words.
Summary Yoroi DRep votes NO on DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (₳1,500,000). We appreciate the DeltaDeFi team’s continued efforts and commitment to building on Cardano. However, at this stage, we are not convinced that the proposal clearly...
Summary
Yoroi DRep votes NO on DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (₳1,500,000). We appreciate the DeltaDeFi team’s continued efforts and commitment to building on Cardano. However, at this stage, we are not convinced that the proposal clearly demonstrates tangible, user-facing benefits or readiness for Treasury-level support.
Rationale
• Unclear Benefit to ADA Holders and End Users
While positioned as infrastructure, the proposal does not clearly explain how this directly benefits ADA holders in practice. Improved infrastructure alone does not guarantee better user outcomes, and the link between this DEX’s activity and broader ecosystem value remains unclear.
• Insufficient Clarity on Trust Model and User Risk
Key aspects of the Hydra setup remain unclear from a user perspective, including custody assumptions, failure scenarios, and protections if operators are unavailable. This makes it difficult for users to assess risks and trade-offs.
• Outcomes Cannot Be Reliably Evaluated Within the Proposed Timeframe
Six months may be sufficient to deliver the product, but it is too short to assess real adoption, sustained liquidity, or long-term relevance. As a result, it is unclear whether outcomes that matter most to users, such as liquidity, reliable execution, and user growth, can be meaningfully evaluated.
Conclusion
Yoroi believes that at this funding level, proposals benefit from clearly articulated user-facing value, trust assumptions, and measurable outcomes. Further clarity in these areas would help support a stronger case for Treasury funding in the future.
I am voting NO on "DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (₳1,500,000)". Treasury withdrawal leads to ADA inflation for ADA holders, so the benefits to ADA holders need to be explained. I think Hydra-related products tend to have a hard time...
I am voting NO on "DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (₳1,500,000)".
Treasury withdrawal leads to ADA inflation for ADA holders, so the benefits to ADA holders need to be explained. I think Hydra-related products tend to have a hard time justifying this.
Adoption of Hydra products does not increase the number of L1 transactions. If DeltaDeFi wins in competition with Minswap or similar platforms, it may actually decrease them. For Hydra products, the number of L1 transactions is hardly a useful metric, and from the ADA holder's perspective, it does not increase staking rewards or ADA inflows to the treasury. This in itself is not a bad thing, but it makes it difficult to explain the benefits to ADA holders from a transactional perspective.
I'm likely missing something, but I couldn't figure out who runs the Hydra head. Are users required to join the Hydra head? If not, who do they need to trust?
I couldn’t figure out their liquidity strategy. In the end, all DEXes except Minswap are struggling to get liquidity.
私は「DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget (₳1,500,000)」にNOを投票します。
トレジャリーウィズドローはADA保有者のADAのインフレーションにつながるため、ADA保有者にとっての利益が説明できる必要があります。Hydra系プロダクトはこの点の正当化に苦労する傾向があると思います。
Hydraのプロダクトの採用は、L1トランザクション数を増加させません。仮にMinswapなどと競争してDeltaDefiが勝つ場合は逆に減少します。Hydraプロダクトに関しては、L1のトランザクション数はほとんど役に立つ指標にならず、ADA保有者の視点から見るとステーキング報酬が増えるわけでも、トレジャリーへのADA流入額が増えるわけでもありません。これ自体は悪いことではないですが、トランザクションの側面からADA保有者へ利点を説明することは困難です。
私が見逃している可能性が高いですが、Hydraヘッドを誰が運営するのかを読み取ることができませんでした。ユーザーは必ず Hydraヘッドに参加することになっていますか?仮にそうではない場合、誰を信頼する必要がありますか?
流動性獲得のための戦略を読み解くことができませんでした。結局のところ流動性の獲得にMinswap以外のDEXは苦しんでいます。
The Cardano Foundation votes YES. We support this proposal to advance Hydra-based trading infrastructure. By funding an experienced team to deliver a production-ready L2 exchange, we believe this proposal will validate Hydra's utility for DeFi and improve...
The Cardano Foundation votes YES. We support this proposal to advance Hydra-based trading infrastructure. By funding an experienced team to deliver a production-ready L2 exchange, we believe this proposal will validate Hydra's utility for DeFi and improve Cardano’s scaling capabilities.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
Our support for this proposal is driven by the following key factors:
- Advancing Hydra Infrastructure: Hydra is an important building block of Cardano's scaling strategy, yet it currently lacks sufficient consumer-grade applications. We believe DeltaDeFi offers a tangible opportunity to validate Layer 2 scaling for DeFi. Supporting this initiative is not merely funding a DApp; it is a strategic investment in hardening the underlying Hydra infrastructure to meet the ecosystem's 2026/2027 scaling objectives.
- Supporting Proven Builders: The team behind DeltaDeFi (SIDAN Lab) has a verifiable track record of delivery, most notably with MeshJS and other open-source contributions. We believe it is important to retain and empower established teams who actively build and maintain core developer tooling. We view the deliverables here as a potential reference implementation for future L2 order-book exchanges, setting a standard for others to follow.
- Accountability via KPIs: We commend the team for structuring their proposal around clear, measurable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). This data-driven approach to accountability, tracking specific metrics like TVL, volume, and L2 transaction efficiency, is a standard we strongly encourage across the ecosystem.
The Cardano Foundation votes YES. We support active builders addressing scaling challenges and expect rigorous execution against the proposed KPIs.
---> **_NOTE on 'Internal Voting':_**> The fields _constitutional_ and _unconstitutional_ below reflect the CF governance teams' individual opinions whether they are _for_ or _against_ the proposal. Reason for this inconsistency is, that CIP-136 is at the moment only applicable to CC rationales, but we want to record the internal opinions of our DRep assessment transparently as well.As SIPO DRep, I cast a Yes vote on this proposal: DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget. I support this proposal because I see it not as funding a single DEX or application, but as an investment in core market infrastructure that helps Cardano...
As SIPO DRep, I cast a Yes vote on this proposal:
DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget.I support this proposal because I see it not as funding a single DEX or application, but as an investment in core market infrastructure that helps Cardano become a practical and usable trading platform, rather than remaining only an experimental DeFi ecosystem.
Today, Cardano DeFi is largely centered around AMM-style DEXs. These have played an important role in accessibility and early adoption. However, they are not well suited for low-latency, order-book-based, API-driven trading — the kind of environment expected by professional traders, market makers, and arbitrage participants.
As a result, structural issues such as slippage, fragmented liquidity, and price gaps versus CEXs continue to exist.This proposal directly addresses those gaps by aiming to deliver a Hydra-based, low-latency order-book trading venue, positioning Cardano as a blockchain that can realistically support efficient and competitive trading infrastructure. I believe this problem framing is both timely and aligned with Cardano’s long-term direction.
From a DRep perspective, one of the most important aspects of this proposal is its role as a real-world validation of Hydra. Hydra is a cornerstone of Cardano’s scalability strategy, yet production-grade, high-frequency use cases remain limited. Attempting to run a demanding trading workload on Hydra is one of the strongest possible stress tests. Regardless of outcome, the lessons learned will be valuable for the entire ecosystem.
I also place strong value on the inclusion of the Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme. By committing to a baseline report, a public KPI dashboard, and a final progress report, this proposal makes ecosystem impact measurable and transparent. This represents a meaningful step forward in Treasury governance — shifting from qualitative narratives to quantitative evaluation of outcomes.
In addition, the proposal demonstrates a relatively robust governance structure for Treasury-related work: multisig fund control, phased releases, independent audits, and explicit fund return mechanisms if the project is halted. These elements are important safeguards and set a constructive precedent for future infrastructure-focused funding.
For these reasons, I support this proposal as an Info Action and vote Yes to signal approval of its direction and intent. This is not an unconditional endorsement of future withdrawals, but a recognition that the proposal addresses a genuine structural need and proposes a reasonable, measurable, and staged approach.
If a subsequent Treasury Withdrawal Governance Action is submitted, I believe it should be evaluated strictly on delivered results, KPI progress, audit findings, and operational performance.
As SIPO DRep, I view this proposal as a meaningful step toward Cardano maturing into a blockchain that is not only well-designed, but actively used as real economic infrastructure.
SIPO DRepとして、本提案(DeltaDeFi: Hydra Trading Infrastructure Budget)に Yes を投じます。
本提案は、単なる一つのDEXやアプリケーションへの支援ではなく、Cardanoを「実用的な取引基盤」として成立させるための基盤インフラ投資である点を、私は特に重要だと考えています。
現在のCardano DeFiは、AMM型DEXを中心に発展してきました。これはユーザーにとって分かりやすく、参加しやすい一方で、低遅延・板取引・API前提の取引、すなわちプロフェッショナルな市場参加者や流動性提供者が求める取引環境という点では、まだ十分とは言えません。
その結果として、スリッページ、価格乖離、流動性の断片化といった構造的な課題が残っていると認識しています。本提案が目指しているのは、こうした課題に対して Hydraを活用した低遅延・オーダーブック型取引インフラ を提供し、Cardanoを「実験的なDeFiの場」から「現実に使われる市場基盤」へと一段引き上げることです。この問題設定自体が、Cardanoの現在地と将来像を正しく捉えていると評価しています。
また、SIPO DRepとして特に重視しているのが、Hydraの実運用による検証です。HydraはCardanoの中長期戦略において非常に重要なL2技術ですが、実際の高頻度・高負荷ユースケースにおける成功事例は、まだ限定的です。本提案は、取引という最も要求水準の高い領域でHydraを本番環境として使い切ろうとするものであり、その成否にかかわらず、Cardano全体にとって極めて価値の高い検証になると考えています。
さらに、本提案は Vision 2030 KPI Measurement Programme を明確に組み込んでおり、
・ベースラインレポート
・公開ダッシュボード
・6か月後の進捗レポート
を通じて、Treasury支出とエコシステムへの貢献を数値で可視化しようとしています。
これは、今後のCardanoガバナンスにおいて非常に重要な姿勢であり、「良さそうだから支援する」から「測定可能な成果として評価する」段階への移行を示すものだと受け止めています。加えて、マルチシグによる資金管理、段階的な資金解放、独立監査、プロジェクト停止時の返金条項など、Treasury資金を扱う上でのガバナンス設計が比較的明確かつ慎重に構築されている点も、Info Actionとして賛成するに足る理由です。
以上の理由から、SIPO DRepとして私は、本提案の方向性に賛同し、Info Actionとしての「Yes」 を投じます。
これは無条件の承認ではなく、「基盤インフラ投資として妥当な問題設定であり、段階的に検証されるべき取り組みである」という評価に基づく賛成です。将来、このInfo Actionを前提としたTreasury Withdrawalが提出される際には、KPIの達成状況、監査結果、実際の運用実績を厳密に確認した上で、改めて判断する必要があると考えています。
Cardanoが研究・設計の段階を超え、実際に使われる経済基盤へと成熟していくための一歩として、本提案には意味があると判断しました。