GNP1_DRep
327,218 ₳327.2K ₳voting power
20 delegators0.01% of active voting power
About
Objectives
Remove minPoolCost, or replace it with a minimum margin, since a percentage treats every pool the same whatever its size. Raise k so stake spreads across more pools. Back treasury spending on infrastructure, protocol work, developer tooling and marketing that reaches real users. Vote against spending on conferences and echo-chamber events. Explain my votes publicly on X. More at https://grahamsnumberplus1.com
Read moreShow less
Motivations
I have run GNP1, a small self-hosted stake pool, since 2020. I charge 0% margin, and I currently return the 170 ADA minimum fee the protocol forces on me to my delegators. When the pool earns enough, we donate to mental health charities. I became a DRep because the rules are tilted against pools like mine. minPoolCost comes out of a pool's rewards before delegators see anything, so it takes a far bigger share from a small pool than a large one, and delegators drift to the big operators. Stake keeps concentrating and new pools struggle to ever mint a block. Governance should fix that, not protect it.
Read moreShow less
Qualifications
Stake pool operator since 2020, running on my own hardware with 100% uptime. I build open Cardano tools on my own db-sync, including the Non-Producing Pool Monitor cited in a CIP pool-pruning proposal. A long career in high-technology, financial and other crime investigation, computer forensics and compliance, including compliance reviews under the UK Bribery Act and the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Read moreShow less
Governance record
- Yes21 (78%)
- No6 (22%)
- Abstain0 (0%)
No vote changes
Percentiles compare active DReps with at least five concluded actions since their registration. What these numbers mean
Recognition (8)
Activity
Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.
NoCardano Strategic Copper Reserve | ₳22M RWA TokenizationSubmitted epoch 661revotedView rationaleActive1d ago
Voted NO. Treasury money shouldn't be used for a high-cost, speculative commodity bet with weak safeguards and an Ethereum-first setup.
I voted NO on the Cardano Strategic Copper Reserve (₳22M RWA Tokenization). Treasury money shouldn't be used for a high-cost, speculative commodity bet with weak safeguards and an Ethereum-first setup. Looks desperate.
Earlier votes
No6d agoSuperseded
YesShould stakePoolTargetNum (k) be raised from 500 to 1000? (SPO poll)Decided epoch 663revotedView rationaleClosed1d ago
Voted YES on raising k from 500 to 1000. Stake has stopped moving, and raising k gives new pools a real chance and a more decentralised Cardano.
I voted YES on raising k from 500 to 1000 as both a DRep and an SPO.
Don't let anyone bamboozle you with tech talk. The numbers are simple: stake has stopped moving. I checked them on the chain itself:
- Only 0.16% of stake changes pool each epoch. In 2021 it was 1.36%.
- 60% of the stake delegated to launch-era pools in 2020 is still with launch-era pools six years on.
- Just 36 to 58 operators hold over half of all stake and SPO voting power.
Raising k to 1000 halves the point where a pool is full, to about 38.9M ADA. Big pools would have to shed stake, and that stake has to go somewhere, giving new pools a real chance.
This is about a fairer start for small pools and a more decentralised Cardano.
Earlier votes
Yes18d agoSuperseded
Show 22 moreShow less
On-chain profile details
- DRep ID
- drep1y26p...9qq5cyc2
- Payment address
- addr1q9wj...4qznjwyv
- Registered since
- Nov 2, 2024
- Last metadata update
- 1d ago
- Data freshness
- On-chain data as of 2h ago