Blockfrost's transformation to not-for-profit

System1mo ago3 posts

On-chain changes

  • 9,832,979 ₳paid tostake1784...kq5u3j9v

Abstract

Blockfrost is a reliable way for developers to interact with the chain without running their own infrastructure or node. This proposal transitions Blockfrost into a free, community-governed public good, owned by the people who build on it where the Blockfrost source code, trademarks, and domains are transferred into community stewardship under an independent, community-governed not-for-profit. It funds a 18-month transition and operations into community ownership.

Total ask: ₳9,832,979 ($1,868,266 at $0.19/₳).

Motivation & rationale

1. Introduction

Blockfrost is the lingua franca of Cardano. It lets developers read from and interact with the Cardano blockchain through a simple, hosted REST interface — without having to run and maintain their own node. By providing an abstraction layer over raw blockchain data, Blockfrost removes the operational complexity of building on Cardano, so teams can focus on their applications instead of their infrastructure.

Blockfrost was founded in 2020 by Five Binaries and joined IOG in 2024 with the goal of decentralizing it.

2. Blockfrost's current usage metrics

According to the annual State of the Cardano Developer Ecosystem survey hosted by the Cardano Foundation, Blockfrost is the number-one hosted platform developers use in their projects, and its adoption has grown every year:

Last month alone, Blockfrost served 781k unique visitors across more than 1.84 billion API requests — almost 700 rps — and delivered over 7 TB of API data.

In most Cardano epochs, more than 50% of all transactions are submitted through Blockfrost. This was the impetus to begin decentralizing Blockfrost last year, with a mandate from the community. Since then, more than 100 Icebreakers — decentralized Blockfrost operators — have joined the effort.

3. Blockfrost's transformation to not-for-profit

Since day one, our primary mission has been to support Cardano ecosystem developers and, most importantly, to onboard new ones. At present, 90% of all Cardano traffic served through the Blockfrost API comes from the free tier, and it has been challenging to leverage the commercial model to finance this public-good operation.

We have come to a decision: we can go either fully commercial or fully public-good, but not both at the same time. The commercial path would inevitably harm adoption, as it would force us to raise prices, eliminate the free tier, and take similar steps. Given Blockfrost's importance as a critical infrastructure component, we decided this would do more harm to the ecosystem than we are willing to accept. An earlier Blockfrost proposal was not funded and we took the feedback to heart, particularly the community's hesitation around the treasury supporting a commercial venture, and have reshaped our approach accordingly. Therefore, we would like to ask the community to support transitioning Blockfrost into a fully not-for-profit, community-governed public API of Cardano.

The not-for-profit will provide an open, free, public API to everyone, covering the Cardano mainnet, preview, and preprod networks in their current format.

4. Governance

The not-for-profit governance of Blockfrost will be led by a board approved by the community, with a mandate to negotiate and lead the future of Blockfrost. The legal and organizational structure — whether a newly formed entity or integration into an existing open-source not-for-profit organization (with PRAGMA being the candidate currently under consideration) — will be determined during the formation process in consultation with the preliminary board and legal counsel, with the goal of minimizing overhead and maximizing credibility and community trust.

The board will have five seats. Four are dedicated to open-source infrastructure development entities (any company focused on Cardano infrastructure with an open-source history), and one is a community seat open to anyone, to provide proper transparency and oversight. We hope to run the elections by the end of the year, with the new board appointed no later than the end of Q1 2027.

To set up the not-for-profit and guide it through a successful transition to the board election, we will appoint a preliminary board consisting of:

  • Beatrice Anihiri (Blockfrost)
  • Christina Gianelloni (BlinkLabs)
  • Federico Weill (TxPipe)
  • Jeni Davidson (SundaeLabs)
  • Francis Luz (Masumi/Begin Wallet)

During the first year of operation, IOG will hold a non-voting, purely advisory seat to help ensure a successful transition.

The infrastructure costs of running the Blockfrost service will be shared publicly and approved by the board with a public dashboard showing the current Blockfrost usage.

All Blockfrost intellectual property — including source code, trademarks, domain names, and associated assets — will be transferred to the governing not-for-profit entity, whether newly formed or existing, as part of the transition.

5. Path to sustainability

Decisions about long-term sustainability beyond the 18-month funding period will rest with the community-led board and will need to adapt to market and ecosystem conditions.

We propose that the board first consider adding a commercial offering alongside the free public API, operated by the not-for-profit itself, with all future profits returned to the Cardano Treasury. The not-for-profit would offer paid tiers — with dedicated SLAs and infrastructure — under community governance, with pricing decisions remaining under the oversight of the community-elected board, ensuring the commercial arm never undermines the free public good. In effect, the treasury's initial support becomes an investment: the ecosystem funds the transition, and commercial proceeds flow back to the community that financed it, with revenue and costs verifiable through the public dashboard and quarterly reports. Over time, commercial revenue should offset the cost of running the free tier, eliminating the need for further treasury funding.

The board could also consider a vendor-backed not-for-profit model. The not-for-profit would continue to run the free-tier public API and retain ownership of all Blockfrost intellectual property, while coordinating the product's development within a broader vendor ecosystem.

An open set of vendors, acting as official partners of the not-for-profit, would serve commercial needs beyond the free tier: any qualifying party could join, offer services on top of the public API under their own terms, and pay membership fees to the not-for-profit. Users who need a commercial solution would choose from a published list of partner vendors and negotiate directly.

The vendors could also jointly provide the technical infrastructure behind the public API itself, operating it as a federated network of operators. We hope many currently serving Icebreakers take on this role too, as they bring extensive experience running Blockfrost products.

Neither model is novel: similar structures have proven successful in other ecosystems, such as Drupal and OpenStreetMap. Both keep the public good free and community-governed while building a revenue stream that does not depend on continued treasury funding.

6. Deliverables

Sequence Item Description
Q3 2026 Milestone 1: Entity establishment & transition kickoff Not-for-profit entity legally established (or host-organization agreement signed) under the preliminary board; technical transition architecture and migration plan published for community review; public usage dashboard live.
Q4 2026 Milestone 2: Board election Board election held via on-chain voting under publicly published rules; results verifiable on-chain and the newly elected board formally assumes its mandate from the preliminary board.
Q1 2027 Milestone 3: Transition of services All public API traffic (mainnet, preview, preprod) served by the new stack; all Blockfrost intellectual property — source code, trademarks, domain names, and associated assets — legally transferred to the governing entity; service performance maintained at current levels throughout the cutover.
Q2-Q3 2027 Milestone 4: Sustainability consultation The newly elected board opens a public discussion on the long-term sustainability model, publishes a proposal (including the vendor-backed model outlined in this document) for community feedback, and documents the outcomes and chosen direction.
2027 Operational milestones 5–12: Sustained operations Public API operated at a minimum 99% monthly uptime SLA, measured and verifiable on the public dashboard; quarterly reports published covering technical metrics and budget summary. Each monthly milestone is independently verifiable against the published dashboard data.

7. Budget Allocation

The total funding requested for this proposal is 1,868,266 USD, to be disbursed in ADA at a conversion rate of 0.19 USD per ADA — a total of 9,832,979 ADA for 18 months of operations (including the transition period).

Any unspent post-transition infrastructure budget will be returned to the treasury. The board will publish a quarterly report including technical data and a budget summary.

Component Weight Allocation (ADA) Allocation (USD)
Staffing 79.1% $1,478,266 7,780,347
Ops & Infrastructure 19.3% $360,000 1,894,737
Legal, Accounting 1.6% $30,000 157,895
TOTAL 100% $1,868,266 9,832,979

The Staffing budget includes salaries for a team of six and overhead: one project manager, one community manager, and four developers. The team will deliver the technical transition and cover the ongoing maintenance and development of the product after the transition period, and may explore future directions aligned with the broader vision as capacity allows. Salaries are reported as team averages to safeguard individual privacy in line with applicable jurisdictional regulations.

The Ops & Infrastructure budget covers the entire infrastructure stack — compute, hosting, and tooling, along with the DevOps personnel who monitor and operate it — at an expected cost of approximately $20,000 per month.

The Legal & Accounting budget covers legal fees and the costs of establishing the not-for-profit entity or migrating existing services to it, including the transfer of intellectual property.

8. KPIs

Core Cardano 2030 KPIs (Adoption) Alignment KPI Alignment Narrative
TVL Yes — indirectly Blockfrost does not lock value itself, but it is the data and submission layer behind many Cardano dApps, including DeFi and RWA front-ends and the wallets that interact with TVL-bearing protocols. Keeping reliable, free access available lowers the barrier for the new applications that grow TVL.
Monthly Transactions Yes — directly enables Blockfrost is the submission path for a large share of Cardano transactions — more than 50% in most epochs. Sustaining this path as a free, reliable public good directly protects and grows transaction volume, letting smaller operators and new apps submit without running their own infrastructure.
Monthly Active Users (MAU) Yes - Enables / Indirectly The wallets and applications built on Blockfrost serve the end users counted in MAU. Lowering infrastructure cost and friction lets more applications launch and stay live, and the free-tier subsidy keeps existing apps and their users undisrupted during the transition — collectively supporting growth in active users.

8.1 Additional KPIs

Additional Cardano 2030 KPIs (Adoption) Alignment KPI Alignment Narrative
Reliability: Monthly Uptime (6 epochs) Yes - Directly Blockfrost does not produce blocks, so it does not affect protocol uptime itself; what it underpins is the reliability of the access layer most applications depend on. Decentralizing across more than 100 Icebreakers removes single points of failure, and the operational subsidy funds a DevOps team to hold the free-tier API to a 99% monthly uptime SLA throughout the transition (Milestones 6–18).
Operational Resilience: Voting Power Distribution of Controlling Stake N/A
Operational Resilience: Alternative Full Node Clients N/A
Revenue / Adoption: Annual Protocol Revenue Yes - Enables By keeping transaction submission free and reliable for a majority share of network activity, Blockfrost sustains the transaction volume that generates protocol fee revenue. Lower infrastructure costs make more applications economically viable, and protecting the free tier ensures existing apps are not disrupted — collectively supporting fee-based protocol revenue.
Governance: Drep Participation Rate N/A
Scalability: Throughput Capacity per day Yes — enables / indirectly L1 throughput is set by the protocol, not the API layer, but as that capacity rises the data and submission layer must scale with it or become a bottleneck. Blockfrost's decentralized operator model distributes that load so the access layer keeps pace with rising on-chain capacity, and the subsidy keeps the free tier stable as the transition proceeds.

9. Pillars

Cardano 2030 Pillars Alignment Pillar Alignment Description
Pillar 1: Infrastructure & Research Excellence Keep Cardano secure, fast, and interoperable so it can host more economic activity. Yes - Fully Blockfrost is core access infrastructure: it keeps the chain reliably usable for applications and lowers the barrier to building on Cardano. It does not work on protocol-level research, client diversity, interoperability, or security, so its alignment is partial — concentrated on the availability, performance, and reliability of the data and submission layer rather than the base protocol.
Pillar 2: Adoption & Utility Driving widespread, non-speculative utility by focusing on high-value industry verticals, superior user experience (UX), and enterprise-grade security. Yes - Fully Developer experience sits at the centre of this pillar, and Blockfrost is the leading hosted platform developers use to build on Cardano, with an open-source core and a free tier that removes the cost barrier to onboarding. Keeping that access free and reliable for the 90% of developers who depend on it sustains the practical utility that the high-value verticals (DeFi, RWA, payments) and the wallets serving end users are built on.
Pillar 3: Governance Cardano governance must be hard to capture, easy to use, and paced. This builds directly on Cardano’s tripartite model of DReps, Constitutional Committee, and SPOs. N/A
Pillar 4: Community & Ecosystem Growth Driving global engagement through a market-centric approach, cultivating a skilled developer base, and proactively demonstrating ecosystem value. Yes - Partially Blockfrost grows the builder community by keeping data access free for developers of all sizes, and the Icebreakers program gives independent operators — including SPOs — a new role as decentralized data providers. It does not address education pipelines or regional market strategy, so alignment with this pillar is partial.
Pillar 5: Ecosystem Sustainability & Resilience Ensuring the long-term financial health and operational integrity of the network infrastructure. Yes - Fully This pillar concerns the long-term operational integrity of network infrastructure, which is the core purpose of the transition. Moving Blockfrost to a community-governed not-for-profit means a critical public good is funded and overseen equitably rather than depending on a single commercial entity, with unspent budget returned to the treasury and the Icebreakers model diversifying who operates the infrastructure.

Cardano 2030 Pillars: https://product.cardano.intersectmbo.org/vision/strategy-2030/

10. Treasury Governance & Compliance

10.1 Contract Management

A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between Input Output and the Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the Constitution, and will be administered by Intersect. This will include details of the project delivery schedule and dispute resolution.

10.2 Project Delivery

All milestones, acceptance criteria, payment amounts and expected delivery dates will be agreed between the Input Output and Intersect, acting on behalf of the CDH. Input Output will deliver according to the agreed-upon project schedule within the Legal Contract, of which the necessary information will be made public via the budget management platform via transaction metadata.

Defined by the milestones within a Legal Contract, Input Output will submit and attest milestone acceptance to the community, Intersect or 3rd Party Assurer.

Project progress will be monitored via Intersect's delivery assurance function which will be communicated to the community.

Acceptance of the work will be supported by a 3rd Party Assurer, who will be responsible for reviewing and signing off the work completed at each project milestone against the corresponding milestone deliverables detailed within the Legal Contract. This work is funded from a portion of this treasury withdrawal.

10.3 Auditable Accounts & Fund Delegation

Budget Management Tooling

To administrate treasury funds on-chain, Intersect will utilize the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs. A new instance of these smart contracts has been deployed for 2026, mirroring the contracts from the 2025 budget cycle.

  • The 2026 Treasury Reserve Smart Contract stake address: stake1784sdxt6jjennmstphgdu7l7c2scf5d02a6cve2dgn5s2kq5u3j9v
  • The 2026 Treasury Reserve Smart Contract payment address: addr1x84sdxt6jjennmstphgdu7l7c2scf5d02a6cve2dgn5s2k8tq6vh499n88hqkrwsmealas4psng674m4sej5638fq4vqmxs59w
  • The 2026 Project Specific Smart Contract payment address: addr1x9d6k9z6t6fvsetj2djmerargk475lef9gfvshy4rwh4h7jm4v295h5jepjhy5m9hj86x3dtafljj2sjepwf2xa0t0aq048cay
Budget Management Specifics

Intersect will utilize a single Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with one Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC). Intersect’s management consists of five ‘admin’ and three Intersect ‘leadership’ roles. An Oversight Committee consisting of six external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSC will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.

The Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, NMKR, Sundial and Eternl. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.

For all details on Intersect's configuration please see the Smart Contract Guide on the knowledgebase.

The high level permissions are as follows:

  • TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify
    • Two of the five Intersect admins, two of the six trusted entities and one of the three Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Disburse
    • Two of five Intersect admins, three of six trusted entities and two of three Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Pause and Resume
    • Two of five Intersect admins, and one of three Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Sweep
    • One of five Intersect admins, and one of three Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Reorganize
    • Two of five Intersect admins and three of six trusted entities must authorize
Processes

Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. All instances of TRSC and PSSC can not be staked with a SPO and will be delegated to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. From here funds will be withdrawn into a UTxO remaining at the TRSC.

When the Legal contract is prepared and Input Output is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.

A dashboard will be available (treasury.sundae.fi) for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain.

10.4 Funding Denomination

All amounts in this proposal are denominated in ada (₳). The total Treasury ask is ₳9,832,979. USD figures ($1,868,266) are provided for reference only, based on an ADA/USD rate of 0.19.

10.5 Refund Conditions

All funds not disbursed by the end of the delivery period will be returned to the Cardano Treasury. A final reconciliation will be published as part of the oversight reporting cycle. In the event of partial delivery or scope reduction, unspent funds associated with cancelled or reduced deliverables will be returned proportionally.

10.6 Prior Treasury Receipts

IO and its affiliated entities have been accountable for delivery of work funded by the Cardano Treasury over 2025/26. The total funds allocated has been ₳130,708,860 across a number of projects within Treasury Smart Contract, to date IOG has withdrawn ₳85,552,881.

Note: this does not account for Governance Actions that have been enacted in 2026 as these funds have yet to be dispersed into smart Contracts.

Workstream Ada received % of allocation Corresponding Governance Action
Blockfrost ₳1,137,500 88% 8ad3d454f3496a35cb0d07b0fd32f687f66338b7d60e787fc0a22939e5d8833e#2
Catalyst ₳3,095,400 60% ** 8ad3d454f3496a35cb0d07b0fd32f687f66338b7d60e787fc0a22939e5d8833e#23
IOE ₳54,130,896 56% 8ad3d454f3496a35cb0d07b0fd32f687f66338b7d60e787fc0a22939e5d8833e#1
IOR ₳26,840,000 100% 8ad3d454f3496a35cb0d07b0fd32f687f66338b7d60e787fc0a22939e5d8833e#32
Governance ₳349,085 59% 8ad3d454f3496a35cb0d07b0fd32f687f66338b7d60e787fc0a22939e5d8833e#22

**Note: for Catalyst this only reflects the workstream that focuses on the Hermes Infrastructure and UX/UI improvements, not the execution and operation of Funds 14-16. Per Info Action this is in the process of transitioning to Cardano Foundation.

10.7 Net Change Limit Compliance

The requested amount does not at time of submission, on its own or in aggregate, breach the applicable 350M Net Change Limit covering Epoch 613 to Epoch 713.

In accordance with the guardrail TREASURY-02a, this withdrawal does not exceed the NCL at the moment of submission.

10.8 Audit & Oversight

Audit and oversight costs are included within the overhead applied to this proposal. The Intersect administration fee covers administrative oversight and is reflected within the cost of this proposal. Independent oversight will be provided through Intersect and technically capable third-party, including reporting obligations and milestone-based disbursement controls.

Rationale highlights

Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words. About vote rationales

  • We appreciate the attempt to transform Blockfrost into a public good.

    But 13600 USD per month per employee in Europe? How much of a monthly income does Blockfrost currently generate, what does it currently cover?

  • No184.6M ₳

    The Cardano Foundation votes NO. We recognize Blockfrost's importance to Cardano's developers, however this proposal’s budget is insufficiently justified against the stated scope. A PDF version of this rationale is also made available. Blockfrost is a widely...

    The Cardano Foundation votes NO. We recognize Blockfrost's importance to Cardano's developers, however this proposal’s budget is insufficiently justified against the stated scope.

    A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.

    Blockfrost is a widely relied-upon access layer for building on Cardano, and moving a piece of critical infrastructure out of a single commercial vendor and into community governance is a defensible public-good aim. We commend the team for reshaping an earlier commercial proposal in response to community feedback. However, we cannot support this withdrawal in its current form.

    • The core asset is already open and already community-funded. The Blockfrost backend has been published under Apache-2.0 since September 2022, and that open-sourcing was itself funded through Project Catalyst. The reference to "source code ... transferred into community stewardship" therefore overstates what changes hands. Stripped of the already-open code, the request resolves into a one-time transfer of trademarks and domains plus 18 months of operating expenses, and should be justified as such rather than as the community acquiring a codebase it does not have. This transfer can be done relatively inexpensively, although further detail would be required (number of trademarks, their registration details, transfer destination) to better understand this.
    • The budget is not adequately substantiated. Staffing accounts for roughly 79% of the request for a team of six, on an already-built product entering a maintenance and transition phase. The proposal does not provide deliverable-level detail sufficient to justify this level of investment.
    • The path to sustainability is non-binding. Both routes to self-sufficiency are framed as options a future board "could consider," while the only concrete milestone commits to opening a discussion. After 18 months and ~9.83 million ada, there is no binding commitment to operating without further treasury support, which structurally invites a follow-up request.
    • Transparency and the community Board seat. The preliminary board is composed of infrastructure vendors, some of whom could become paying partners under the proposed vendor-backed model, while the single community-elected seat arrives only after the formative stage is complete. We would expect further detail on conflict of interest safeguards and additional, specific, reporting obligations to bridge the gap between inception of the work and election of the community director.

    The Cardano Foundation votes NO. Our objection is to this implementation, not to the goal of securing Blockfrost as a community-governed public good. We encourage the team to return with a leaner, detailed, request justified transparently as operating expenditure and a brand transfer, with deliverable-level budget detail, a binding sustainability commitment, and enhanced transparency safeguards.

    ---

    > **_NOTE on 'Internal Voting':_**

    > The fields _constitutional_ and _unconstitutional_ below reflect the CF governance teams' individual opinions whether they are _for_ or _against_ the proposal. Reason for this inconsistency is, that CIP-136 is at the moment only applicable to CC rationales, but we want to record the internal opinions of our DRep assessment transparently as well.

  • The wanchain post-mortem analysis announcement changes my opinion on this from "abstain" -> "yes"

  • Yes88.4M ₳

    SIPO DRep votes YES, with expectations, on the treasury withdrawal "Blockfrost's transformation to not-for-profit" (9,832,979 ADA). This action funds an 18-month transition of Blockfrost — the most widely used hosted API for building on Cardano, the "lingua...

    SIPO DRep votes YES, with expectations, on the treasury withdrawal "Blockfrost's transformation to not-for-profit" (9,832,979 ADA).

    This action funds an 18-month transition of Blockfrost — the most widely used hosted API for building on Cardano, the "lingua franca" developers rely on to read from and interact with the chain without running their own node — from an IOG-owned asset into a free, community-governed public good. The source code, trademarks, and domains would move into an independent not-for-profit under a community-elected board. The request is 9,832,979 ADA (a modeled ~$1,868,266 at $0.19/ADA), disbursed against deliverables, with any unspent funds returned to the Treasury and quarterly public reporting.

    SIPO supports this. Blockfrost is genuine developer infrastructure, and converting it from a single-vendor commercial asset into a permissively-governed public good — owned by the community that builds on it — is exactly the kind of ecosystem-hardening the treasury exists for. It is the same public-good category SIPO supported across the 2026 Intersect Budget Process infrastructure withdrawals. Fund control is the strongest class SIPO recognizes: the on-chain recipient is the 2026 Intersect Treasury Reserve Smart Contract at the script credential stake1784sdxt6jjennmstphgdu7l7c2scf5d02a6cve2dgn5s2kq5u3j9v, on the Sundae Labs treasury-contracts framework, with milestone-gated disbursement, a multi-party authorization quorum, independent oversight, and a public dashboard. The Constitutional Committee voted 3-0 that the action is constitutional.

    SIPO attaches expectations rather than treating the design as settled. First, the not-for-profit itself is not yet formed: the legal entity, the choice between a new organization and an existing host, and the five-seat board election are all to be determined during the transition. SIPO expects the entity structure and the board-election process and timeline to be finalized and published, so the destination of these public assets is concrete before the bulk of funds are disbursed. Second, Blockfrost currently operates a commercial, paid offering; a treasury-funded transition to a public good should disclose how the existing commercial arrangement, its revenue, and the asset valuation are handled, so the community understands what it is receiving and at what basis. Third, the proposal itself contemplates a future community-run commercial tier whose profits return to the Treasury; SIPO expects that return, if adopted, to be contractually fixed so the treasury's transition funding functions as the investment the proposal describes. None of these conditions the vote; they are the basis on which SIPO will judge delivery. This vote is SIPO DRep's recorded position.


    SIPO DRep として、トレジャリー引き出し提案「Blockfrost's transformation to not-for-profit」(9,832,979 ADA)に、期待事項を付して賛成(YES)を投じます。

    本件は、Cardano 上で開発するために最も広く使われているホスト型 API — 開発者が自前のノードを動かさずにチェーンを読み書きするための "lingua franca" である Blockfrost — を、IOG 所有の資産から、無料でコミュニティが統治する公共財へと 18 ヶ月かけて移行するための資金です。ソースコード・商標・ドメインは、コミュニティが選出する理事会のもとで独立した not-for-profit へ移されます。要求額は 9,832,979 ADA($0.19/ADA でモデル上 約 $1,868,266)で、成果物に対して支払われ、未消化分は国庫へ返還、四半期ごとに公開報告されます。

    SIPO はこれを支持します。Blockfrost は本物の開発者インフラであり、単一ベンダーの商用資産から、それを土台に開発するコミュニティが所有する寛容なライセンスの公共財へ転換することは、まさに国庫が担うべきエコシステム強化です。これは SIPO が 2026 Intersect Budget Process のインフラ引き出しで支持したのと同じ公共財の類型です。資金統制は SIPO が認める最強の類型で、オンチェーン受領先は 2026 Intersect Treasury Reserve Smart Contract(script credential: stake1784sdxt6jjennmstphgdu7l7c2scf5d02a6cve2dgn5s2kq5u3j9v・Sundae Labs treasury-contracts フレームワーク上)で、milestone gate 支出・複数者の承認定足数・独立した監督・公開ダッシュボードを備えます。Constitutional Committee は 3 対 0 で本アクションを合憲と判断しています。

    SIPO は設計が確定したとは扱わず、期待事項を付します。第一に、not-for-profit 自体がまだ形成されていません。法的実体、新組織か既存ホストへの統合かの選択、5 議席の理事会選挙は、いずれも移行期間中に決定されます。SIPO は、これら公共資産の行き先が資金の大半が支払われる前に具体化されるよう、組織構造と理事会選挙のプロセス・スケジュールが確定され公開されることを期待します。第二に、Blockfrost は現在、商用の有料提供を運営しています。国庫資金による公共財化にあたっては、既存の商用の取り扱い・収益・資産評価がどう処理されるかを開示し、コミュニティが何をどの基礎で受け取るのかを理解できるようにすべきです。第三に、提案自身が、利益を国庫へ返す将来のコミュニティ運営の商用 tier を想定しています。SIPO は、それが採用される場合、国庫の移行資金が提案の言う「投資」として機能するよう、その返還が契約で固定されることを期待します。これらはいずれも本投票の条件ではなく、SIPO が履行を判断する際の基礎です。本投票は SIPO DRep の記録上の立場表明です。

See all 63 rationales