Yosh
951,185 ₳951.2K ₳voting power
10 delegators0.02% of active voting power
About
Overview
Generated from public on-chain data
Yosh is an active Cardano DRep, registered in epoch 540. They hold 951.2K ₳ of delegated voting power, about 0.02% of the active stake. Yosh has cast 80 on-chain governance votes (69 yes, 9 no, 2 abstain). Since registering, they have taken part in 79 of 145 decided actions (54%). They have published 9 rationales explaining their votes.
Governance record
- Yes69 (86%)
- No9 (11%)
- Abstain2 (3%)
No vote changes
Percentiles compare active DReps with at least five concluded actions since their registration. What these numbers mean
Recognition (6)
Activity
Want to see how your own views compare? Find a DRep who votes like you.
Yes4b10e5793208cb8f228756e02113227c91602248eac4d992681a0ee760b6c4e2#0Decided epoch 614View rationaleExpired7mo ago
I am voting YES. The questions I previously raised during the GA regarding transparency and clarity around the entities responsible for managing the funds have been adequately addressed.
YesWithdraw ₳70,000,000 for Cardano Critical Integrations BudgetDecided epoch 606View rationaleEnacted9mo ago
Voted Yes. This governance action is foundational to Cardano’s long term success, and there is no alternative entity capable of executing this work effectively.
The founding entities + the Midnight Foundation, will be undertaking a set of critical responsibilities that will also provide a valuable real world test case for how an executive function could operate within Cardano’s governance framework. The outcomes of this effort should meaningfully inform future discussions on establishing an executive group to help guide and steward the blockchain.
YesAdd Constitutional Committee MemberDecided epoch 602View rationaleEnacted9mo ago
Voted Yes. This governance action is necessary to formally record the results of the audited Ekklesia elections on-chain and seat the remaining Constitutional Committee member.
Until all CC seats are filled, the governance system cannot function, and no governance actions can be approved. Passing this GA promptly is essential to restore full operational governance.
Yes2025 Net Change Limit ExtensionDecided epoch 604View rationaleClosed9mo ago
Voted Yes. With the massive support of the Cardano Critical Integrations Budget GA, this necessitates the need for a small extension in the NCL timeframe to allow for the CCIB to have enough time to pass and get approved for its TW. Both are mutually exclusive.
YesCardano Critical Integrations BudgetDecided epoch 604View rationaleClosed9mo ago
Voting YES. This proposal and the approach taken by the Founding Entities and the Midnight Foundation are exactly what Cardano needs at this stage. There are certain initiatives that the FEs are simply better positioned to execute and implement than community developers. It would also be significantly more difficult to trust any group other than the FEs with 70M ADA, especially given the time and complexity involved in securing approvals and funding for these initiatives.
Since the 70M ADA allocation comes from the remaining balance of this year’s NCL, I would like to see some acknowledgment that if the costs required to execute these initiatives exceed the 70M ADA, which is entirely possible, the FEs will cover any surplus.
Show 4 moreShow less
YesReimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.Decided epoch 597View rationaleClosed10mo ago
Voting yes, as it is the fair thing to do for an early pioneer in the governance era; however, the 3,000 ADA is a very bad look and im sure that they now regret including that in this GA.
Voting yes for now, but will vote no on the TW if its anything more than 100,000 ADA.
YesSecuring Generic Top-Level Domains for the Cardano EcosystemDecided epoch 597View rationaleClosed10mo ago
Voted yes, as it will be funded by the CF and is in the best interest of Cardano. Hopefully the CF doesn't hold these domains as hostage in the future, as they will be the owners of them and we the community have no representation in the CF. I trust it will be fine.
YesStablecoin DeFi Liquidity BudgetDecided epoch 589View rationaleClosed11mo ago
Liquidity is one of the biggest challenges facing our ecosystem right now. Despite the risks associated with voting YES on this proposal, I believe the potential benefits outweigh those risks.
That said, I would like to see a clearer and more structured protocol for how these funds will be managed during the TW, as this is essentially a fund management operation above all else.
NoCARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION v2.0Decided epoch 581View rationaleExpired1y ago
While the proposed amendment does a good job of improving clarity and cleaning up definitions, I am voting No on this proposal.
My concern is that replacing budgets with roadmaps removes the detailed financial oversight we currently have. Roadmaps are too broad to judge funding requests on their own, which risks making treasury withdrawals being more fragmented and less disciplined. I do think there are opportunities to improve the process, but I don't feel this has been debated enough. Removing codes of conduct also weakens formal accountability, and shifting more weight onto the Constitutional Committee creates additional risk by concentrating too much discretion in the hands of a small group.
These are significant governance changes that haven’t been discussed enough by the community, and I don’t believe the current Constitution justifies such a quick amendment.
On-chain profile details
- DRep ID
- drep1ytd7...8ce66v4c
- Registered since
- Feb 17, 2025
- Last metadata update
- 1y ago
- Data freshness
- On-chain data as of 4d ago