Cardano Critical Integrations Budget
On-chain changes
Informational action. No on-chain effect; the vote signals opinion only.
Abstract
This Cardano Critical Integrations Budget Governance Action requests ₳70,000,000 from the Cardano Treasury to establish a strategic integration fund supporting the onboarding of critical infrastructure, including tier-one stablecoins, institutional digital asset custody and wallet infrastructures, on-chain analytics platforms, cross-chain bridges, and pricing oracles to the Cardano ecosystem.
This infrastructure establishes the foundational layer required to onboard tier-one stablecoins, with the potential to unlock exponential growth in DeFi transaction volume across the ecosystem. It will also help accelerate ecosystem efforts in other key areas such as Real World Assets (RWA) and DePin. This acceleration is expected to play a key role in supporting Cardano’s path to profitability as a layer one in terms of fee generation, ensuring long-term financial sustainability.
This project is being driven through close collaboration between Input | Output Global, the Cardano Foundation, and EMURGO, together with Midnight Foundation and Intersect, all of whom are actively engaged in negotiations with integration partners. Representatives from all five organizations form the Steering Committee, which is responsible for making key strategic decisions. The founding entities and Intersect also recognize the Midnight Foundation’s contributions to date.
Infrastructure providers and/or protocol collaborations are in a mature stage, and several partners have already provided detailed pricing and delivery timelines. However, for reasons of strategic and commercial confidentiality, together with partner companies’ compliance requirements, the specific infrastructures involved can only be disclosed outside of the Steering Committee after the integration is completed.
The project will follow a milestone-based funding structure, with budget drawdowns executed from Intersect’s custody and administration only upon submission of signed agreements and the agreed scope of work. The Oversight Committee at Intersect will review drawdown requests to confirm that the amounts and designated recipients align with the executed contracts. Since work is already underway in some of these areas, this proposal envisions an early early budget deployment, and we anticipate this budget being utilized immediately and up to 24-month deployment, depending on withdrawal success, contracting periods, and timely receipt.
Motivation & rationale
Strategic Need
Cardano has a strong technical and governance foundation, but lacks several critical integrations required for large-scale economic activity and external liquidity integration. The absence of key systems, including stablecoin infrastructures, interoperability frameworks, and institutional-grade pricing oracle networks limits the ecosystem’s capacity to attract external capital, facilitate stable on-chain operations, and support advanced DeFi use cases. Cardano also requires solid institutional digital asset custody and wallet infrastructures, as well as on-chain analytics platforms to ensure user access, ecosystem transparency, and multi-chain liquidity efficiency.
Stablecoins
With data and interoperability in place, Cardano can support the introduction of a tier-one stablecoin, the ecosystem’s primary base currency. A stablecoin provides price stability, predictable liquidity, and access for both institutional and retail users. However, its deployment depends on reliable oracle data and established interoperability channels. As such, stablecoin integration is the final step in the infrastructure rollout sequence and the key enabler for large-scale DeFi adoption and sustained liquidity growth.Institutional Digital Asset Custodies and Wallet Infrastructures
User access and transaction flow depend on a high-quality wallet infrastructure that supports multi-asset management, seamless dApp interaction, and secure cross-chain functionality. Wallets serve as the primary interface between users and Cardano’s financial systems; therefore, scalable, reliable, and feature-rich wallet solutions are required to support onboarding, institutional usage, and mass-market adoption. Enhanced wallet capabilities also ensure that new infrastructure layers like bridges, analytics, and stablecoins remain accessible and usable for all users.On-chain Analytics Platforms
A mature financial ecosystem requires transparent, real-time insights into network activity, risk exposure, asset flows, and application performance. Advanced analytics platforms allow developers, institutions, compliance teams, and users to assess liquidity conditions, monitor protocol health, and make informed decisions. Without robust analytics, DeFi operations remain opaque, limiting institutional participation and hindering ecosystem-wide risk management.Cross-Chain Bridges
Once a reliable data layer is established, the next requirement is enabling liquidity and user movement between Cardano and other ecosystems. Bridge and interoperability infrastructures allow assets to transfer securely across blockchains, opening access to external liquidity pools and new user bases. Without these routes, Cardano remains isolated, constraining inflows of capital, developers, and institutional participants.Pricing Oracle Infrastructures
Oracles provide the external data required for DeFi & RWA operations, including asset pricing, risk management, and stablecoin collateralization. While current native providers such as Charli3 and Orcfax deliver early coverage, Cardano still lacks a globally recognized, institution-grade pricing oracle provider. This limitation restricts the ability of major stablecoin issuers and financial applications to deploy on Cardano, as their operations require data from trusted pricing oracle networks. Establishing a robust pricing oracle infrastructure is the foundational step in enabling higher-level financial systems.
Current Gap & Urgency:
Despite being a top-10 blockchain by market cap, Cardano’s Total Value Locked (TVL) as of November 25th, 2025 remains around $191.860.000 (Source: Defillama.com), which is still far below comparable ecosystems that maintain several billion dollars in DeFi usage. This gap highlights Cardano’s limited market reach and the absence of the core primitives that other networks treat as standard utilities. Without scaling these key components, Cardano risks falling further behind in attracting dApps, liquidity, institutional partners, and large-scale integrations such as tier-one stablecoins.
Cardano’s growth requires robust pricing oracles and interoperability layers to connect on-chain applications to external networks and real-world data. These integrations are capital-intensive and time-sensitive, yet they underpin the viability of all future financial primitives.
This proposal is being brought forward now because discussions on these topics have progressed substantially, and are ready to move forward with various partners. With the current NCL set to expire on 4 January 2026, it is both timely and prudent to submit this proposal and its associated withdrawal under the present NCL, provided the community approves.
By establishing a transparent ecosystem integration budget through treasury funding, Cardano can secure these essential components rapidly and fairly.
Why Treasury Funding
Ecosystem Criticality
The Cardano ecosystem needs foundational public infrastructure that every dApp depends on. These components cannot be built or licensed by individual teams; they are shared utilities that must be delivered once, at ecosystem scale, to unlock liquidity, attract developers, and enable institutional use cases.Neutrality & Vendor Independence
Treasury funding ensures that a broad coalition of Cardano stakeholders will determine which critical integrations are onboarded. This avoids commercial bias, guarantees neutrality, and allows the integrations to be governed transparently under Cardano’s constitutional framework.Governance Alignment & Transparency
By placing the budget under Intersect administration, all fund flows follow constitutional guardrails: separate auditable addresses, auto-abstain delegation, milestone validation, independent audits, and public reporting. This ensures full community oversight from start to finish and reinforces decentralized governance across the entire integration pipeline.
Timeline & Current State of Governance
This budget info action and its associated treasury withdrawal governance action will seek to pass prior to the expiry of the current NCL on 4 January 2026. While this is an ambitious timeline, it is believed to be possible with expedient voting from DReps and the CC, and justified on the underlying need for this proposal and motivation expressed above.
The withdrawal timeline is envisaged as follows:
- 27 November 2025: Submission of this budget info action.
- As early as the 4 December 2025: Provided there is sufficient DRep approval at this stage and signs are not overwhelmingly negative, the associated treasury withdrawal will be submitted in parallel to allow DReps to consider the withdrawal and begin voting. This will still be subject to the CC vote and passing of this budget info action.
- 8 December 2025: The update CC governance action will be launched (based on current timelines announced by Intersect)
- 30 December 2025: This budget info action expires
- 4 January 2026: Provided that the new CC is appointed; the CC have voted; DReps have approved the budget info action and DReps have cast sufficient votes for the treasury withdrawal - then the treasury withdrawal will pass on the final day of the current NCL.
The treasury withdrawal will not be deemed constitutional until the budget info action passes on 30 December 2025 (if DReps and CC approve), however, DReps will be able to vote on the actions and express their view from as early as 4 December 2025. CC members may also cast preliminary opinions on constitutionality during the period of voting on the budget info action, and finalise their opinions on the treasury withdrawal between 30 December 2025 and 4 January 2026.
It is fully acknowledged that there are multiple dependencies to the passing of the treasury withdrawal governance action, however it is technically feasible with sufficient community support, which we hope to receive.
Steering Committee
The Steering Committee provides high-level business direction and integration governance of this initiative. The committee oversees negotiation strategy, prioritization of integrations, and overall alignment with Cardano’s ecosystem needs. Its purpose is to ensure that each integration delivers clear strategic value and that strategic decisions are made transparently, rationally, and in the best interest of the ecosystem.
The Steering Committee operates as a five-member group representing Input | Output Global, the Cardano Foundation, EMURGO, Midnight Foundation and Intersect. These members act independently to maintain neutrality. Together, they evaluate which integrations should be onboarded first, assess ecosystem impact, and guide the negotiation of commercial and contracting terms with integration partners. The Steering Committee voting members will not be compensated from withdrawn funds and will each cover their own expenses. An amount of no more than 5% of the budget will be allocated to legal, custodian fees, administration, and compliance costs of the Administrator and connected parties.
The Steering Committee comprises representatives from each of the following organizations:
- Input | Output Global
- Cardano Foundation
- EMURGO
- Midnight Foundation
- Intersect (as a non-voting member acting in the capacity of the Administrator)
The Cardano Critical Integrations Budget will use the requested ₳70,000,000 to cover:
• Integration and other necessary associated costs
Cover the integration work and all related expenses, including deployment development, licensing fees, maintenance costs, and any additional infrastructure required to support the integrations.
• Legal and Audit
Cover due diligence, legal, insurance, and compliance requirements, and periodic independent audits to satisfy the requirements of the Cardano Constitution.
• Contingency Reserve
Maintain a reserve to accommodate scope adjustments or market shifts, while preserving delivery certainty and financial discipline.
• Admin Fees
Cover custody fees, minting fees of stablecoins, and any other administrative costs that may arise during setup and execution of the Cardano Critical Integrations Budget
₳ 70,000,000 refers to the remaining funds available within the current NCL. A high-level budget breakdown is planned to be included in the subsequent Treasury Withdrawal Governance Action following this Budget Info Action. However, due to confidentiality obligations applied by most integration partners, the breakdown will be limited in granularity. If the allocated budget is not used at the end of the 24-month period, all remaining funds will be returned to the Cardano Treasury.
Administration of Funds
All treasury funds will be administered by Intersect as an Administrator under Cardano’s constitutional framework. All treasury funds for this initiative will be administered by Intersect under Article IV of the Constitution. Intersect acts as the administrator for the entire budget. Contracting for integrations will be assigned on the principle of budget compatibility and “most likely to succeed”, i.e. to any entity that has the required skills and availability. This Budget Info Action is submitted by Intersect with support and the collaboration of the Cardano Foundation, Input Output Global, and EMURGO as co-proposers.
Steering Committee Authority
The Steering Committee will negotiate commercial terms with integration partners and will include a technical assessment of feasibility and implementation requirements.
Allocations from this budget will be approved by the Steering Committee. The quorum for any budget allocation to an integration will be 3/4 of all Steering Committee members. Once an integration is approved, Intersect will administer and execute the associated disbursements to the contracting entity, as defined for each integration.
The Steering Committee will publish progress reports upon achieving integration milestones
Role of Intersect and Contractual Counterparties
Intersect will receive the funds and administer this budget. If this Budget Info Action and the subsequent Treasury Withdrawal are approved, funds will be received into the Treasury Reserve Smart Contract framework administered by Intersect with checks and balances from the independent smart contract Oversight Committee made up of five members; the Cardano Foundation, NMKR, Xerberus, SundaeLabs and Dquadrant. Funds from there will be disbursed transparently according to the contracting arrangements. Disbursements will be made directly from the smart contract framework or an institutional-grade custodian to vendors, as selected by the Steering Committee. It is currently not envisioned that the smart contract framework deployed earlier this year will be fully utilized, as this will likely result in disclosure of integration costs, which are typically confidential and protected by non-disclosure agreements. Intersect and the co-proposers will endeavor to negotiate integration contracts that allow for as much public disclosure as reasonably possible and the Steering Committee will disclose such information in their progress reports.
Co-proposers or other entities chosen by the Steering Committee from time to time may, if required, act as the contracting counterparty with an integration partner. When this occurs, Intersect and the Cardano Development Holdings will enter into a contract with the designated entity defining the scope, obligations, reporting requirements, and drawdown conditions. Under this arrangement, the designated entity receives disbursements from related smart contract/s or custodians as determined by the contract terms.
Intersect will only act as a contracting counterparty when it has completed its own due diligence and satisfied its Delivery Assurance standards. If Intersect declines to act as counterparty for a specific integration, another designated entity may do so, provided that a contract is established between that designated entity, Intersect and the for the purpose of receiving budget disbursements.
Payment Execution and Safeguards
Disbursements will be executed through either smart contracts or institutional-grade custodians. These disbursements will follow the Statements of Work and the commercial terms approved by the Steering Committee.
Unused funds and program conclusion
If at the end of the 24 months period the budget has not been fully utilized, all remaining funds will be returned to the Cardano Treasury. A final reconciliation and summary will be included in the oversight reporting by Intersect, in collaboration with the Steering Committee.
Cardano Addresses
Treasury funds will be received and held by Intersect, acting as the Constitutional Administrator, in addresses or accounts designated exclusively for this proposal and auditable by the community.
To fulfil constitutional requirements, these addresses will be delegated to the Auto-Abstain DRep and will not be staked to any Stake Pool Operator (SPO), ensuring that the funds do not influence governance or generate staking rewards. It is currently not envisioned that smart contracts will be fully used by Intersect to disbursement funds, to protect the confidentiality of vendor pricing. However, they will be used where possible and Intersect will be able to ensure oversight and transparency through the independent audit and access to information.
Through this arrangement, Intersect maintains full custody transparency, enabling verifiable auditing and milestone tracking under Cardano’s constitutional governance framework, satisfying Articles IV(2), (4) & (5) in particular.
Goals & Metrics
| Category | Target | Verification Source |
|---|---|---|
| Stablecoin | A tier-one stablecoin is targeted for deployment on Cardano mainnet as the integrations progress. | The integration is live on Cardano Mainnet. |
| Institutional digital asset custody and wallet infrastructure | The program aims to support the deployment of a tier-one stablecoin on Cardano mainnet as delivery progresses. | The integration is live on Cardano Mainnet. |
| On-chain analytics platform | Tier-one analytics platform targeted for mainnet. | The integration is live on Cardano Mainnet. |
| Cross-chain bridge | A tier-one cross-chain bridge is planned for mainnet deployment as integration work with selected partners is finalised. | The integration is live on Cardano Mainnet. |
| Pricing oracle | Tier-one pricing oracle targeted for mainnet. | The integration is live on Cardano Mainnet. |
| Transparency compliance | Completed milestones reported through the Intersect channel. | Intersect reports. |
| Audit completion | Annual independent audit conducted and published, following Intersect’s current financial reporting framework for Tier 3 full assurance. | Intersect reports. |
Acceptance Criteria and Milestone-Based Disbursement
The acceptance criteria will vary between vendors, but will be made public once commercial terms and contracting has been agreed between the vendor, Intersect and the Steering Committee. It is expected a “milestone zero” payment will cover the essential setup costs of this initiative, which may include converting ada into a stablecoin, stablecoin minting fees, and custody fees. Converted assets will be held in a regulated custodian. Legal costs for onboarding integration partners are also included in this early operational budget.
In general, integration partners will receive funds only after verified delivery of agreed technical and operational milestones. That said, payment structures may vary deal to deal. Where a partner requires funds in advance to commence delivery, an upfront payment may be made at the point of contract signature. Any such upfront disbursement or “milestone zero” payment will be explicitly defined in the agreement and tied to a clear scope and deliverables.
Integrations requiring ongoing support may receive additional approved maintenance payments during the program period.
This disbursement structure ensures efficient execution, transparent financial management, and strict alignment with Cardano’s governance requirements.
Reporting
Intersect and the Steering Committee will publish a bi-annual report covering:
- Financial Summary & Treasury Reconciliation – total funds disbursed, remaining, and audited.
- Project Progress & Milestone Review – integration status and outcomes.
- Audit & Compliance Statement – summary of independent audit findings.
- Ecosystem Impact Assessment – measurable effects on Cardano adoption and interoperability.
- Governance & Future Outlook – proposed next steps or renewal recommendations.
Constitutionality Checklist
Article III.5
✔️ This proposal is prepared in a standardized and legible format and will include a URL and hash of all off-chain materials at submission. It provides a clear title, abstract, rationale, motivation, and supporting information in accordance with this article.
Article IV.1
✔️This proposal fits the purpose of Article IV.1 as it supports the maintenance, operation, and future development of the Cardano ecosystem through critical integrations.
Article IV.2
✔️This proposal specifies Intersect as the administrator and outlines transparent reporting, an oversight structure and explains where the processes are or are not administered via smart contracts (where it is not possible or beneficial). These elements meet the constitutional requirement for the use of administrators and on-chain tools where beneficial.
Article IV.4
✔️This proposal allocates a budget for independent audits and includes clear oversight metrics & mechanisms such as contractual milestone-based verification, bi-yearly reporting, dispute resolution provisions (to be included in relevant legal contracts), and a defined Steering Committee. These elements satisfy the constitutional requirements for audits and oversight metrics.
Conclusion
The Cardano Critical Integrations Budget is a decisive step toward addressing one of Cardano’s most pressing issues: the lack of mature oracle and interoperability integrations, alongside other core integrations required for large scale DeFi and attracting external liquidity. With these foundational integrations in place, and with tier-one stablecoin onboarding, Cardano can finally overcome the barriers that have historically prevented developers, institutions, and liquidity from other leading blockchains from entering Cardano.
This proposal unlocks the power of decentralized governance and transforms weakness into strength by allocating ₳70,000,000 in constitutionally governed, milestone-based funding. This funding supports the full rollout sequence of ecosystem critical integrations, including institutional digital asset custody and wallet infrastructures, tier one on-chain analytics platforms, cross-chain bridges, and globally recognized pricing oracles, all of which together provide the essential data, liquidity pathways, user access, and stablecoin rails on which every thriving DeFi network relies.
Transparently administered by Intersect under Cardano’s governance framework and guided by an experienced Steering Committee, The Cardano Critical Integrations Budget ensures verifiable outcomes and measurable ecosystem value through clear contracting, milestone verification, and independent audits. It is a catalyst that demonstrates how decentralized governance can responsibly allocate capital while accelerating the delivery of critical integrations that will ensure Cardano’s long-term competitiveness and sustainability.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words.
Summary Yoroi DRep votes YES on the Cardano Critical Integrations Budget Info Action. We believe this proposal is the direct and timely way to close Cardano’s critical integration gaps and unlock the next phase of ecosystem growth. Rationale Ecosystem...
Summary
Yoroi DRep votes YES on the Cardano Critical Integrations Budget Info Action. We believe this proposal is the direct and timely way to close Cardano’s critical integration gaps and unlock the next phase of ecosystem growth.
Rationale
Ecosystem Critical Integrations
Yoroi believes this proposal establishes a strategic integration fund to onboard critical infrastructure Cardano needs for large-scale economic activity and external liquidity integration. The scope targets tier one stablecoins, oracle networks, cross-chain bridges, institutional digital asset custody and wallet infrastructures, and on-chain analytics platforms.
Impact on Adoption
These integrations strengthen Cardano’s ability to attract external capital, support advanced DeFi use cases, and accelerate efforts in Real World Assets and DePin. They also support Cardano’s path to profitability through stronger fee-generating activity.
Governance, safeguards, and urgency
The funds will be administered by Intersect under Article IV through publicly auditable addresses designated exclusively for this proposal and delegated to the Auto Abstain DRep, with milestone-based drawdowns, bi-annual reporting, and annual independent audits, which Yoroi believes are aligned with the Cardano Constitution and its requirements for transparent treasury administration. With negotiations already mature and the Net Change Limit expiring on 4 January 2026, progressing this budget now is timely.
Conclusion
Yoroi DRep supports this Budget Info Action because it is necessary, well-structured, and time-sensitive. Therefore, we strongly vote YES.
Conditional YES — Questions for Clarification I would like to give a conditional YES to the “Cardano Critical Integrations Budget.” Because this is a very large request, I kindly ask for clarification on the following points. Given that this governance...
Conditional YES — Questions for Clarification
I would like to give a conditional YES to the “Cardano Critical Integrations Budget.” Because this is a very large request, I kindly ask for clarification on the following points. Given that this governance action places notable time pressure on both DReps and the CC, I would greatly appreciate it if these explanations can be provided before the Treasury Withdrawal Governance Action is submitted.- Justification for the 70M ADA amount Please explain why 70M ADA is the appropriate figure. Why would 65M ADA be insufficient, and why would 75M ADA be excessive?
- High-level breakdown of the 70M ADA Separate from (1), could you provide the most detailed breakdown possible for how the 70M ADA is expected to be allocated?
- More robust success metrics (KPIs) The current “live on mainnet” metrics seem insufficient. Could you include numerical KPIs such as increases in TVL, user numbers, external capital inflows, or transaction volume? These would help DReps evaluate success or failure more objectively.
- Specific gaps in existing Cardano infrastructure For each integration category (Custody/Wallet, Analytics, Bridge, Oracle), could you specify what is currently missing on Cardano? For example, regarding wallet infrastructure: what exactly is lacking today in Lace or Eternl, and what needs to be developed?
- Vendor lock-in risk Is there a risk that this budget creates strategic dependency on a specific vendor? Are there standardization or “exit” clauses to prevent lock-in?
- Required SLA/security levels What levels of SLA, availability, and security requirements are being set for Oracle, Bridge, Analytics, Custody, and Wallet integrations?
- Conditions for stopping or scaling down the program While unused funds will be returned after 24 months, could you clarify under what conditions the program can be paused, reduced, or stopped midway? Who has the authority to trigger such decisions?
- Precedents on other L1s Are there successful examples from other L1 ecosystems (e.g., Solana, Ethereum) that used a similar integration-budget model? If so, what were the success and failure factors?
- Timing and remaining NCL capacity This proposal appears close to the end of the current NCL and uses most of its remaining capacity. Could you clarify: (a) Why this was kept until now, and (b) Why it must be executed within this NCL, rather than splitting into phases across the next NCL?
- Balancing confidentiality and constitutional transparency While NDA-protected information is understandable, Cardano governance requires transparency. Can you disclose, at minimum: (a) Cost ranges per integration category (b) Number of vendors involved (c) Expected contract durations so that DReps can reasonably judge the appropriateness of the plan?
- Relationship with existing Cardano-native projects How will this budget interact with existing Cardano-native infra teams (e.g., Charli3)?
- Handling of underperformance (“failure rules”) If, after 24 months, the KPI targets (TVL, Tx volume, capital inflow, etc.) fall significantly short: (a) How will root-cause analysis be conducted? (b) How will learnings affect future large-scale infrastructure proposals? As DReps, we would like clarity not only on success criteria but also on how failure will be addressed.
条件付きYES — 確認したい事項
「Cardano Critical Integrations Budget」について、条件付きでYESを検討しています。 非常に大きな予算規模であるため、以下の点についてご説明いただけますと幸いです。 また、このガバナンスアクションは DRep と CC に時間的な負荷を与える構造になっているため、可能であれば トレジャリーウィズドローの提出前に 情報の公開をお願いできればと思います。- 70M ADA の妥当性について なぜ 70M ADA が適切な金額なのかご説明いただけますか? 65M ADA では不足し、75M ADA では過剰となる理由を DRep が理解できる形で示していただけると助かります。
- 70M ADA の明細内訳について 上記(1)とは別に、可能な範囲で 70M ADA の高レベルな内訳をご提示いただけると幸いです。
- 成果指標(KPI)の強化について 「Mainnet で live する」という基準だけでは成功判定としては不十分に思われます。 TVL、ユーザー数、外部資本流入量、Tx 数など、数値ベースのKPIを設定していただくことは可能でしょうか?
- 既存インフラの不足点の具体化について 各統合(Custody/Wallet、Analytics、Bridge、Oracle)において、 現在のCardano上で何が具体的に不足しているのかを明確化していただけますか? 例:Walletインフラで言及されている multi-asset management や seamless dApp interaction のうち、 Lace や Eternl のどの部分が不足しているのか など。
- ベンダーロックインのリスクについて 今回の予算が特定ベンダーへの依存を生まないよう、 標準化や脱出条項(exit clause)などを設ける計画はありますか?
- SLA・可用性・セキュリティ要件について Oracle / Bridge / Analytics / Custody / Wallet に対し、どのレベルのSLAや安全性を求めているのか、 基準値を事前に共有していただくことは可能でしょうか?
- 途中停止や縮小の条件について 未使用分の返還があることは理解していますが、 「中間時点での軌道修正・縮小・停止」が可能な条件を明確にしていただけますか? また、その判断権限は誰が持ち、何をトリガーとして実行されますか?
- 他L1における前例の分析について Solana や Ethereum などで類似の統合モデルが存在する場合、 成功要因・失敗要因の分析を共有していただけますか?
- NCL期限直前での提出理由について 現行NCLの残枠をほぼ使い切る内容を、このタイミングまで温存していた背景を説明していただけますか? また、次のNCLに跨ぐ形でフェーズ分割するのではなく、今回のNCL内で全額を処理する必要性についても、 より明確な理由をご説明いただけると助かります。
- 機密性と透明性の両立について NDAによる情報制限は理解しますが、一方でCardanoの憲法は透明性を求めています。 カテゴリ別のコストレンジ、ベンダー数、契約期間など、 DRepが予算妥当性を評価するうえで最低限必要な情報を事前に公開することは可能でしょうか?
- Cardanoネイティブプロジェクトとの関係について Charli3 など既存のCardanoネイティブプロジェクトとの競争・協調関係をどのように設計していますか?
- 24ヶ月後の未達時の扱いについて もし24ヶ月後にKPI(TVL、Tx数、外部資本流入など)が大きく未達だった場合、 (a) どのように原因分析を行い、 (b) 次の大規模インフラ提案にどのように反映するのか、 「失敗時のルール」を事前に示していただけますか? DRepとしては、成功時だけでなく、未達時の説明責任の取り扱いも重要だと考えています。
I am voting No on the Critical Integrations Budget Governance Action. While I acknowledge the strategic potential of investing in infrastructure to boost Cardano’s DeFi and TVL metrics, this proposal lacks sufficient transparency and operational detail to...
I am voting No on the Critical Integrations Budget Governance Action. While I acknowledge the strategic potential of investing in infrastructure to boost Cardano’s DeFi and TVL metrics, this proposal lacks sufficient transparency and operational detail to justify the requested ₳70M budget. Key information such as cost breakdowns and partner identities is currently undisclosed, citing strategic or competitive reasons. This lack of disclosure prevents the community from meaningfully evaluating the proposal prior to approval. The structure and responsibilities of the proposed steering committee also remain unclear, as do the criteria for prioritizing investments and measuring outcomes. Despite references to objectives like 'TVL expansion' or 'DeFi enablement', the absence of clear success metrics, ROI projections, and budget oversight mechanisms raise doubts about feasibility and impact. Proposals of this scale require more than aspirational goals—they demand accountable processes. Furthermore, although the proposal claims that the ₳70M will not be disbursed all at once, approval would effectively commit the treasury to this maximum amount without phased checkpoints or accountability layers. The Cardano Treasury is a shared resource intended to support sustainable and decentralized ecosystem growth. Any major allocation should be grounded in demonstrable need, measurable outcomes, and transparent governance. Based on the current state of the proposal, I cannot support it at this time. I hope to see a revised and more detailed version in the future, one that incorporates clearer structure, defined metrics, and phased execution mechanisms to gain broader community trust. [Japanese Version follows] 私はこの「Cardano Critical Integrations Budget」ガバナンスアクションに対して反対票(No)を投じます。DeFiの促進やTVL向上といった目的に対して、戦略的なインフラ投資が必要であるという主張には理解を示しますが、提案内容は₳70Mという大規模な予算を正当化するに足る透明性や運営詳細を欠いています。コストの内訳や提携先の情報など、評価に必要な重要情報が開示されていないため、コミュニティが意思決定を行ううえでの判断材料が不足しています。これらの非開示については「競争上の理由」「戦略的ポジショニング」などが理由として挙げられていますが、情報がない状態では正当な評価は不可能です。加えて、ステアリング・コミッティの構造や責任範囲、投資配分の基準、成果の測定方法も不明瞭です。「TVLの拡大」や「DeFi基盤の構築」といった目的自体は共有できますが、成功指標、費用対効果、資金管理手法などが明示されていないため、実現可能性やインパクトには懸念が残ります。この規模の提案においては、ビジョンだけでなく、アカウンタビリティのある仕組みが不可欠です。また、₳70Mが一括で支出されるわけではないと明記されているものの、承認されればその上限額までの支出が実質的に保証される構造となっており、段階的な審査や中間レビューなどの歯止めが存在しません。カルダノのトレジャリーは、持続可能で分散型のエコシステム成長を支えるための共有資源です。こうした巨額の予算配分は、具体的な必要性と成果指標、透明な統治構造に基づくべきです。現時点での提案内容では、それらの条件を満たしているとは判断できず、賛同することはできません。今後は、より具体的な構造・指標・段階的実行を備えた改善提案が提示され、広くコミュニティの信頼を得ることを期待します。
We support the goal of bringing critical integrations such as stablecoins, custody, bridges, and analytics to Cardano, but the current proposal lacks the transparency needed for a ₳70M treasury withdrawal. There is no itemized cost breakdown, no clear...
We support the goal of bringing critical integrations such as stablecoins, custody, bridges, and analytics to Cardano, but the current proposal lacks the transparency needed for a ₳70M treasury withdrawal. There is no itemized cost breakdown, no clear prioritization of integrations, and limited visibility into partner selection or execution strategy. This level of opacity is not acceptable for the largest budget request in Cardano’s history. We encourage a revised version with clear costs, justification, and accountability so the community can responsibly support this important initiative.