Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026–2027
On-chain changes
- 18,263,496 ₳paid tostake17xz...6ghh5qjr
Abstract
This treasury withdrawal requests ₳18,263,496.00 (USD $4,565,874.00) to fund Tweag by Modus Create's delivery of 3 work packages across core infrastructure areas for the Cardano ecosystem over 2026–2027.
The primary focus is the mainnet deployment of Peras (faster finality: ~2 min vs. ~12 min today), alongside improvements to resilience, scalability, developer tooling, and network observability. Work packages include:
- Peras v1 – production cryptography, KillSwitch, mainnet readiness and further support and maintenance
- History Expiry – partial-history nodes to reduce SPO storage costs
- Conformance Testing – CTC framework extended for Peras and Leios
Intersect is requested to serve as proposal and contract administrator. All deliverables are open-source and publicly tracked.
Motivation & rationale
Problem Statement
Cardano's next growth phase depends on two critical protocol upgrades: Peras (faster finality) and Leios (higher throughput). Together they unlock significantly higher transaction volume, staking rewards, and TVL. However, these upgrades do not deliver value on their own — they require:
- Production-grade mainnet delivery — Peras v1 remains undeployed on mainnet. Real cryptography, operational tooling, and Hard Fork readiness must be completed.
- Resilience and correctness scaffolding — Protocol changes of this complexity require conformance testing, mutation testing, adversarial fork simulation, and audit infrastructure to de-risk deployment.
- Sustainable node economics — Increased throughput from Leios will cause SPO disk usage to surge (~1 GB/hour at 100–1000 TPS). Without History Expiry, full-history requirements will become economically prohibitive, threatening decentralization.
Tweag has been engaged on Cardano's core infrastructure since January 2018, leading the consensus and ledger teams, implementing Ouroboros Genesis, and contributing to Peras design. This proposal represents the natural continuation of that work, focused on ensuring prior investments reach mainnet and are adopted by the community.
Why This Proposal Addresses the Problem
Delivery Strategy
This proposal is structured as a single delivery pipeline, not a modular menu. The 3 work packages are interdependent: conformance testing provide the instrumentation and correctness scaffolding required to validate Peras, History Expiry helps to reduce SPO's costs. Treating them as separable would increase delivery risk.
Budget Justification
The total ask of ₳18,263,496 is based on an average market rate of $176/hour for senior Cardano infrastructure engineers, a conservative ADA/USD conversion rate of 0.25 (based on a 5-year average). CBU/ARK research subcontracts for Peras cryptography are included as fixed-price line items.
Governance Separation
Where success depends on governance (Hard Fork activation, CIP progression), Tweag commits to 'ready-for-activation' deliverables — merged code, reproducible releases, runbooks, benchmarks, and governance-action packages. Ecosystem activation is reported separately with clear owners and risks.
Intersect as Administrator
Tweag requests Intersect serve as contract and audit administrator per the Cardano Constitution, using Milestone-Based Fixed Price contracts where scope is well-defined.
Treasury Governance & Compliance
Contract Management
A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between Tweag and the Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the Constitution, and will be administered by Intersect. This will include details of the project delivery schedule and dispute resolution.
Project DeliveryAll milestones, acceptance criteria, payment amounts and expected delivery dates will be agreed between the Tweag and Intersect, acting on behalf of the CDH. Tweag will deliver according to the agreed-upon project schedule within the Legal Contract, of which the necessary information will be made public via the budget management platform via transaction metadata.
Defined by the milestones within a Legal Contract, Tweag will submit and attest milestone acceptance to the community, Intersect or 3rd Party Assurer. All technical deliverables will undergo a rigorous, multi-stage review process to ensure protocol integrity and security. This includes mandatory code review by Input Output Global (IOG), as primary maintainers of the target Cardano repositories, to preserve architectural consistency. Independent validation will be provided by No Witness Labs, engaged as a third-party assessor across the relevant work packages.
Project progress will be monitored via Intersect's delivery assurance function which will be communicated to the community.
Acceptance of the work will be supported by a 3rd Party Assurer, who will be responsible for reviewing and signing off the work completed at each project milestone against the corresponding milestone deliverables detailed within the Legal Contract. This work is funded from a portion of this treasury withdrawal.
Auditable Accounts & Fund Delegation
Budget Management ToolingTo administrate treasury funds on-chain, Intersect will utilize the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs. The smart contracts have been extensively tested including audits from TxPipe and MLabs.
Final mainnet validation test can be seen via the Disburse action within transaction: 0f591dc544ae14102dbb4a74d5311a6acffc1772b163d8b7a9656b9525950b17
This withdrawal will utilise Intersect’s 2025 treasury reserve contract with address being: stake17xzc8pt7fgf0lc0x7eq6z7z6puhsxmzktna7dluahrj6g6ghh5qjr
Funds will later be migrated to a 2026 treasury reserve contract once established.
Intersect will utilize a single Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with many Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC), managed by Intersect. Intersect's management consists of three 'admin' and two Intersect 'leadership' roles. An Oversight Committee consisting of five external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSCs will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.
The 2025 TRSC Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, Xerberus and NMKR. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.
For all details on Intersect's configuration please see the Smart Contract Guide on the knowledgebase.
The high level permissions are as follows:
- TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify
- Two of the three Intersect admins, two of the five trusted entities and one of the two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
- TRSC Disperse
- Two of three Intersect admins, three of five trusted entities and two of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
- TRSC Pause and Resume
- Two of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
- TRSC Sweep
- One of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
- TRSC Reorganize
- Two of three Intersect admins and three of five trusted entities must authorize
Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. All instances of TRSC and PSSC can not be staked with a SPO and will be delegated to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. From here funds will be withdrawn into a UTxO remaining at the TRSC.
When a 2026 TRSC is established, the funding for this project will be migrated via the ‘disburse’ action.
When the Legal contract is prepared and Tweag is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.
A dashboard will be available for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain.
Strategic Alignment
- Pillar 1: Infrastructure and Research Excellence — all 3 packages directly advance L1 protocol infrastructure.
- Pillar 5: Ecosystem Sustainability and Resilience — History Expiry.
Community Engagement Commitments
- Public demos at minimum every 2 months, recorded and published at https://tweag.github.io/cardano-website/
- Regular status updates on the Tweag project website
- Dedicated Discord channel for community engagement
- Program-level Slack channel for cross-team coordination with IOG and other ecosystem contributors
Prior Treasury Receipts
TWEAG has been accountable for delivering work funded by the Cardano Treasury. The total funds allocated are ₳11,070,322.68 within the Treasury Smart Contract. ID: 680d1b63565577986442d24e.
Refund Conditions
All funds not disbursed by the end of the delivery period will be returned to the Cardano Treasury. A final reconciliation will be published as part of the oversight reporting cycle. In the event of partial delivery or scope reduction, unspent funds associated with canceled or reduced deliverables will be returned proportionally.
Net Change Limit Compliance
The requested amount does not at time of submission, on its own or in aggregate, breach the applicable 350M Net Change Limit covering Epoch 613 to Epoch 713.
In accordance with the guardrail TREASURY-02a, this withdrawal does not exceed the NCL at the moment of submission.
Audit & Oversight
Audit and oversight costs are included within the overhead applied to this proposal. The Intersect administration fee covers administrative oversight and is reflected within the cost of this proposal. Independent oversight will be provided through Intersect and technically capable third-party, including reporting obligations and milestone-based disbursement controls.
Standardized Format & Immutable Hosting
Upon finalization, this proposal will be hosted on IPFS in an immutable format. The blake2b-256 hash of the document will be provided for on-chain reference and verification.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words. About vote rationales
Summary Yoroi DRep votes YES on "Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026–2027" as a well-scoped and timely investment in the protocol infrastructure that Cardano's next phase of growth depends on. Rationale • Peras mainnet deployment is...
Summary
Yoroi DRep votes YES on "Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026–2027" as a well-scoped and timely investment in the protocol infrastructure that Cardano's next phase of growth depends on.Rationale
• Peras mainnet deployment is overdue.
Peras has been in development and the research is sound, but it remains undeployed on mainnet. Reducing finality from roughly 12 minutes to around 2 minutes is not a marginal improvement; it is a prerequisite for the kind of DApp experiences that compete with other L1s. This proposal funds the production cryptography, KillSwitch mechanism, and hard fork readiness work needed to get it there.
• Keeping node operation economically viable.
At the throughput levels Leios targets, full-history storage requirements will become economically prohibitive for many SPOs. History Expiry is the structural fix for that problem, and funding it now, ahead of Leios activation, is the right sequencing. Delaying it means the problem arrives faster than the solution.
• Tweag's track record warrants confidence.
The team has been contributing to Cardano's consensus and ledger layers since 2018, with prior treasury funding delivered against open-source, publicly tracked milestones. The conformance testing framework being extended here for both Peras and Leios further demonstrates a long-term investment in ecosystem correctness, not just point deliverables.Conclusion
Yoroi supports this proposal as a necessary and well-governed continuation of core infrastructure work that the ecosystem has already committed to. The scope is coherent, the team is credible, and the timing is right. Yoroi votes YES.I vote YES on "Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026–2027." Peras + Leios are necessary pieces for Cardano to compete with other L1s. Given Cardano's current transaction volume, the benefits of Peras may be more immediately tangible...
I vote YES on "Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026–2027."
Peras + Leios are necessary pieces for Cardano to compete with other L1s. Given Cardano's current transaction volume, the benefits of Peras may be more immediately tangible than those of the currently more popular Leios: Peras shortens finality from roughly 12 minutes to about 2 minutes under certain conditions, so it delivers value whether transaction volume is high or low. Tweag's track record can be verified through its activity in repositories such as cardano-ledger (346 commits — the #2 contributor, after iohk.io's 985), cardano-node, and ouroboros-consensus.
Furthermore, in response to community feedback, the scope has been narrowed to the necessary minimum compared with the previous proposal.ーーー
私は「Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026–2027」にYESを投票します。
Peras+Leiosは他のL1との競争において必要なピースです。現在のCardanoのTxの利用量を考慮すると、現味人気のあるLeiosよりも、Perasはそのスケーラビリティ向上の効果を実感しやすいかもしれません。これはファイナリティを12分から2分へ一定の条件下で早めるものですから、Tx量が高くても低くても、効果があります。cardano-ledger(346 commits = #2 contributor (985 iohk.io に次ぐ))、cardano-node、ouroboros-consensus githubレポジトリなどでのTweagの活動を確認することがチームの実績を確認できます。
さらに、コミュニティのフィードバックを受けて、前回の提案書からスコープは必要最小限に絞り込まれました。
I am voting No on this proposal. This year's Net Change Limit (NCL) has been set well above the level I consider sustainable. Under my published voting framework, an appropriate NCL is roughly 15% of the previous year's staking rewards (on the order of...
I am voting No on this proposal. This year's Net Change Limit (NCL) has been set well above the level I consider sustainable. Under my published voting framework, an appropriate NCL is roughly 15% of the previous year's staking rewards (on the order of ₳82M), whereas the NCL currently in force is several times that amount. Because the treasury is already authorized to disburse far beyond my personal NCL threshold, I am voting No on all treasury withdrawal proposals until aggregate withdrawals are brought back within a sustainable limit — regardless of the individual merits of any single proposal. This vote reflects a position on total treasury spend, not a judgment on the value of your specific project. Reference: https://coffeepool.jp/notes/drep-voting-framework-for-sustainable-ecosystem/ [Japanese version follows] 本提案に反対票を投じます。今年のNet Change Limit(NCL)は、私が持続可能と考える水準を大幅に上回って設定されています。公開済みの投票フレームワークでは、適正なNCLは前年のステーキング報酬の約15%(₳82M程度)ですが、現行のNCLはその数倍に達しています。トレジャリーは既に私のpersonal NCL(個人として許容する上限)を大きく超える出金が認められている状態にあるため、出金総額が持続可能な範囲に戻るまで、個別提案の良し悪しに関わらず、すべてのトレジャリー出金提案に反対票を投じます。本投票はトレジャリー支出全体に対する立場の表明であり、貴提案の価値そのものを否定するものではありません。参照: https://coffeepool.jp/notes/drep-voting-framework-for-sustainable-ecosystem-jp/
Finality time and node storage costs are critical bottlenecks in Cardano's infrastructure. Peras’ promise of slashing finality by 84% is a game-changer if delivered securely and efficiently. The budget request of ₳18M though, pegged to a $176/hour senior...
Finality time and node storage costs are critical bottlenecks in Cardano's infrastructure. Peras’ promise of slashing finality by 84% is a game-changer if delivered securely and efficiently.
The budget request of ₳18M though, pegged to a $176/hour senior engineer rate and a conservative ADA/USD ratio, demands scrutiny. While senior talent commands premium rates, the sheer scale here risks inflating operational costs without clear modularity or contingency. The proposal’s insistence on bundling interdependent packages (something I'm NOT a fan of as stated many times) raises delivery risk concentration.
I remain skeptical about whether this approach is the most cost-effective or if alternative, more modular, or competitive bids could achieve similar results with less treasury exposure. Cardano deserves innovation but not at a price that risks treasury depletion without phased, accountable delivery. I'd like to see sharper modularity, competitive benchmarks, and explicit risk mitigation before committing ₳18M+ on a single, intertwined pipeline.