Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.
On-chain changes
- 103,000 ₳paid tostake1uys...gc9s0cm5
Abstract
In September 2024, only weeks after the Chang hard fork to introduce on-chain governance, an Info governance action titled Cardanoの生きがい - Ikigai - was submitted. This was only a symbolic governance action, as it simply asked the community whether they agreed with a statement thanking those that helped get Cardano to this point and expressing a sense of hope for the future.
Unfortunately, due to a bug in the code of the Cardano node that permitted an unregistered stake key to be used in the governance action, the submitter was unable to recover their deposit of 100K ADA. While the community expressed at the time the importance of reimbursing this deposit via a treasury withdrawal; once the ability to do so became available, following the Plomin hard fork; unfortunately none of the entity based budget submissions included it.
The Cardano in Oceania initiative did include the deposit reimbursement in their budget Info governance action, however their governance action was not approved. This governance action therefore aims to resolve this outstanding issue.
Motivation & rationale
There was significant sentiment at the time that the Ikigai Info governance action deposit should be reimbursed. It was considered that the submitter should not lose one hundred thousand ADA, for being an early pioneer of Cardano governance.
This treasury withdrawal is requesting an amount of 103,000 ADA. In addition to the original 100,000 ADA the Ikigai Info governance action submitter lost, they have since also lost staking rewards. This request therefore includes an additional 3,000 ADA to compensate for staking rewards at a rate of 2% per annum.
Constitutionality Requirements
Article II.6 - Governance Action Metadata: This governance action has been submitted in a standardised, legible format with the minimum content required and a hash of the content.
Article II.7.1 - Treasury Withdrawal Terms:
- Purpose of the withdrawal: To reimburse the lost deposit for an Info governance action.
- Period of delivery: This will be instantly performed as part of the governance action’s enactment on-chain.
- Relevant costs and expenses: There are no costs or expenses associated with this treasury withdrawal.
- Circumstances under which the withdrawal might be refunded to the Cardano Treasury: There are no circumstances for refunding to the treasury.
Article II.7.2 - Prior Treasury Funding: The recipient of this reimbursement has not previously received funds from the treasury.
Article II.7.3 - Net Change Limit Adherence: The requested amount does not exceed the current Net Change Limit.
Article II.7.4 - Independent Audits and Oversight Metrics: As the funds will be made available directly to the intended recipient, the Cardano community will be able to audit the distribution on-chain. Therefore, no amount of ADA is required for audits and oversight metrics.
Article II.7.5 - Treasury Withdrawal Administrator: While funds administration is not required, as the funds are being immediately distributed, in order to comply with this requirement the DReps are nominated as the “Administrator”, as they will be responsible for executing the distribution.
Article II.7.6 - Administrator Custody: The funds will not be held by an Administrator, so no compliance regarding the wallet’s delegation is required.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words. About vote rationales
YES. This may not be a protocol bug, but it was at least due to poor design. Let's give the funds back.
YES。これはプロトコルのバグではないかもしれませんが、少なくとも不親切な設計が原因でした。資金を返してあげましょう。
Lots of Japanese DReps already voted YES, so we assume it's legit. Ping us if it turns out not to be.
I vote NO. I recognize the value and importance of the work presented in this proposal. However, given the current Treasury balance and the remaining Net Change Limit, I cannot support funding for initiatives that are not essential to Cardano’s operational...
I vote NO.
I recognize the value and importance of the work presented in this proposal. However, given the current Treasury balance and the remaining Net Change Limit, I cannot support funding for initiatives that are not essential to Cardano’s operational continuity.
To preserve long‑term financial sustainability, I must vote against this proposal.私は本提案に反対します。ガバナンスアクション提出時に失われた100,000ADAのデポジットを返還するという考え方については理解できます。提案本文によれば、この損失はCardanoノードのバグによって発生したものであり、提出者が初期のガバナンス参加者であったことも考慮すべき事情であると考えます。一方で、本提案には当初失われたデポジットに加え、失われたステーキング報酬の補償として追加の3,000ADAが含まれています。私は、失われたデポジットの返還とステーキング報酬の補償は区別して考えるべきであり、Treasury...
私は本提案に反対します。ガバナンスアクション提出時に失われた100,000ADAのデポジットを返還するという考え方については理解できます。提案本文によれば、この損失はCardanoノードのバグによって発生したものであり、提出者が初期のガバナンス参加者であったことも考慮すべき事情であると考えます。一方で、本提案には当初失われたデポジットに加え、失われたステーキング報酬の補償として追加の3,000ADAが含まれています。私は、失われたデポジットの返還とステーキング報酬の補償は区別して考えるべきであり、Treasuryから機会損失まで補償することには慎重であるべきだと考えます。そのため、本提案には反対します。\n\nI am voting No on this proposal. I understand the rationale for reimbursing the 100,000 ADA deposit that was lost when the governance action was submitted. According to the proposal, this loss resulted from a bug in the Cardano node, and I believe the fact that the submitter was an early participant in Cardano governance is a factor that should be taken into consideration. However, this proposal includes an additional 3,000 ADA as compensation for lost staking rewards on top of the original deposit. I believe reimbursement of the lost deposit should be considered separately from compensation for staking rewards, and I am cautious about extending Treasury funding to cover opportunity costs. For this reason, I am voting No on this proposal.