Governance ReviewEpochs 647 to 6492 Aug 2026 to 17 Aug 2026Mainnet

The committee cleared two withdrawals that the DReps did not fund

Scalus and Bifrost cleared the Constitutional Committee, six of its seven members each, and neither secured enough DRep support, at 51.8% and 33.8% against a 67% bar. In the same window the DReps approved ₳120M for Cardano PRIME and agreed to raise the treasury spending limit by ₳150M.

6
of seven committee members voted yes on Scalus, which still ran out
51.8%
of counted DRep power behind Scalus, against a 67% bar
₳150M
added to the treasury ceiling for epochs 613 to 713 by the vote that closed with them
₳120M
ratified at the boundary to epoch 649, the largest sum decided in this window

Two bodies, two questions

Scalus asked the treasury for ₳2.5M and Bifrost for ₳12.3M, both for development work. Six of the seven committee members voted yes on each and one abstained on each, which is 100% of the ballots that count, well above the two thirds a withdrawal needs there. Neither secured the 67% of counted DRep power an approval needs: Scalus reached 51.8% and Bifrost 33.8%. The vote on both ended at the boundary to epoch 647, and every body has to clear its bar at the same boundary, so the money stayed where it was.

That gap is not a contradiction. Under the rules of Cardano governance the Constitutional Committee votes on whether an action is constitutional, while the DReps vote on whether it should happen, which for a treasury withdrawal means whether the treasury should pay for it. The committee’s yes does not guarantee funding, and a DRep no does not necessarily imply a constitutional objection.

Two that failed on both counts, and one that was paid

Global Order Book missed both bars at once, at 26.7% of DRep power and 42.9% in the committee, where three voted yes and four no. dOSPO and OMF ran out one epoch later on 2.4%, the lowest DRep share of the seven decided here, and on 57.1% in the committee, where four voted yes, none against, and three cast no ballot at all.

One request came through. Daedalus asked for ₳1.8M, the smallest of the six amounts here, took 77.1% of DRep power and six committee votes, and was enacted at the boundary to epoch 647.

DRep support of six withdrawals, epochs 647 to 649

In percent of counted DRep power, abstaining power left out, against the 67% bar

Cardano PRIMECardano PRIME: 80.1%80.1%DaedalusDaedalus: 77.1%77.1%ScalusScalus: 51.8%51.8%BifrostBifrost: 33.8%33.8%Global Order BookGlobal Order Book: 26.7%26.7%dOSPO and OMFdOSPO and OMF: 2.4%2.4%67.0% bar
Two above the line, four below it, and the two that cleared the committee and still went unfunded sit in the middle of the spread.

The treasury gets ₳150M more room

Four requests expired, and the DReps widened the envelope the next ones will be judged against. The net change limit for epochs 613 to 713, the cap on what withdrawals may take out of the treasury across that run, went from ₳350M to ₳500M, agreed in Net Change Limit with 62.4% of counted DRep power behind it.

By the end of epoch 649, withdrawals since epoch 613 had used ₳337.4M, almost the whole of the old ₳350M allowance, and all but ₳1.8M of that was drawn before this window. The increase leaves ₳162.6M for the epochs still to come.

A ceiling is not a payment, and every withdrawal still needs its own approval. Cardano PRIME got that approval in this window, on 80.1% of DRep power and six committee votes, ratified at the boundary to epoch 649 with its ₳120M due one epoch later, outside this window. The limit itself is set by an info action, which the ledger neither ratifies nor executes, so the ceiling is an agreement recorded by a vote rather than a rule the chain enforces. DRepTalk tracks what has been drawn against it on the treasury overview.

Where the abstentions went

Four of the ten largest DReps abstained on every one of the four withdrawals that ran out: Yoroi W₳llet at ₳568.9M, Blockdaemon at ₳333.6M, EMURGO at ₳297.2M and Sebastien Guillemot セバ at ₳183.7M.

An abstention is not the same as staying away. DRep power that casts no ballot is folded into the no side, while abstaining power is left out of the count altogether, so those ballots added no yes power and took their weight out of the calculation, where silence would have left it against the proposal. Three of the four voted yes on Cardano PRIME, and Blockdaemon abstained there too, on all seven actions decided in this window.

The numbers underneath

At the base of all this, fewer DReps are voting at all. The count that cast at least one ballot in the last 12 epochs fell from 313 at epoch 647 to 302 at epoch 649, against 342 at epoch 643, and epoch 649 itself saw 74 DRep ballots against 722 in epoch 643. Across all three bodies 341 ballots were cast in the window, replacement votes included. In the window 109 DReps cast a final ballot, each counted once.

The power behind those votes is also more concentrated. The power delegated to DReps barely moved, from ₳5.27B to ₳5.28B, a figure that leaves out the always abstain and always no confidence options, which are delegation targets rather than voters. What moved is where it sits: the ten largest DReps held 49.9% of it at epoch 646 and 51.6% at epoch 649, the most concentrated reading in a record reaching back to epoch 508.

The ten largest DReps, epochs 627 to 649

In percent of delegated DRep power, the two default options excluded

45.0%47.3%49.5%51.8%54.0%Epoch 627: 48.4%Epoch 628: 47.9%Epoch 629: 48.0%Epoch 630: 47.9%630Epoch 631: 48.0%Epoch 632: 48.1%Epoch 633: 48.1%Epoch 634: 47.6%Epoch 635: 47.8%635Epoch 636: 47.9%Epoch 637: 48.5%Epoch 638: 49.2%Epoch 639: 49.0%Epoch 640: 49.0%640Epoch 641: 49.9%Epoch 642: 49.9%Epoch 643: 49.9%Epoch 644: 49.8%Epoch 645: 49.8%645Epoch 646: 49.9%Epoch 647: 50.0%Epoch 648: 51.3%Epoch 649: 51.6%
The concentration moved while the total barely did. The largest single step of the stretch shown is from epoch 647 to epoch 648, inside the window.

What comes next was already being voted on. The renewal of the Constitutional Committee, Update Constitutional Committee 2026, and a change to minPoolCost and the Plutus memory limits, Reduce minPoolCost to 75 ada and increase Plutus Memory Limits (Part 2), both had voting windows ending at the start of epoch 653. Three more were open at the close, Name the Protocol Version 12 hard fork “von Bergen“ to epoch 651 and the withdrawals Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit. and Governance Incentives Framework 2026 to epoch 656. The tallies of all five belong to the windows that follow this one.

Also decided

The numbers behind the window

Delegated to DReps, at the start of epoch 647
₳5.27B
Delegated to DReps, at the start of epoch 649
₳5.28B
Votes cast in the window, superseded votes included
341
DReps whose final ballot fell in the window
109
Treasury, at the start of epoch 647
₳1,446.4M
Treasury, at the start of epoch 649
₳1,453.7M
  • DRep shares are the share of counted power: abstaining power is left out, and power that cast no ballot is folded into the no side. Committee shares count members, with abstentions left out and members who cast no ballot counted against.
  • The committee minimum size in force at the end of epoch 649 is not stated. The data behind this review holds no protocol parameter snapshot at or before this window.
  • Votes cast is every ballot of epochs 647 to 649 across all three roles, superseded votes included.
  • How many actions were open for a vote in each earlier epoch is not part of this record, so the fall in ballots is a reading, not an explanation of it.
  • An info action carries no amount on chain, so the net change limit for epochs 613 to 713 and the ceiling it replaced come from the treasury registry this site maintains. What has been drawn against it is summed from the enacted withdrawals themselves, as of the end of epoch 649. That registry also names the action that closed in this window as the one that raised the ceiling.
  • Five actions were still inside their voting windows when epoch 649 closed. They are named without tallies, because the record holds only their tallies as they stand today, which is after this window.
  • Every lowest and highest reading named here is bounded by this record, which starts at epoch 508.
  • This edition was written after the window closed. Apart from the payment of the ₳120M withdrawal at the boundary to epoch 650, which the text names as outside the window, it carries no outcome reached after epoch 649.

Data behind this edition: a snapshot of the site's governance data taken 2026-09-08 06:00 UTC, frozen as epochs-647-649.pack.json next to the article. Every figure above traces to a field in that file. Its git blob hash 63ea2687be32 pins the exact bytes, whatever later happens to the branch.