Reimburse Ikigai Info Governance Action Deposit.
177 DReps voted · 66 with a rationale · 6 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes129.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes110.9K ₳No rationale
- Yes108.3K ₳Rationale
This action really doesn't require extensive rationale. This is the right thing to do as this was never the treasury's funds and was transferred in error. The funds should be returned. I am in favor of this proposal.
- Yes105.8K ₳No rationale
- Yes103.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes92.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes71.3K ₳No rationale
- Yes65.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes58.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes49.6K ₳Rationale
I agree with this request for reimbursement and 3K compensation for loss
LourdeOuroborus Imperator Aeternalis - No48.6K ₳Rationale
I'm voting No. Cardano Treasury should spent you money on technology, infrastructure. Instead of one-time payments, an insurance fund mechanism or bug bounty system should be introduced so that such cases are resolved through transparent protocols rather than subjective votes.
- Yes46.5K ₳Rationale
Very innovative idea and deserve the support from the Community to make it more accessible for people to enter the GA participation
- No45.2K ₳No rationale
- NoRevoted29.3K ₳History
Earlier votes
No8mo agoSuperseded
- Yes26.7K ₳Rationale
Yes, it's unfair they lost their money just because the system was flawed.
- Yes15.2K ₳No rationale
- Yes10.6K ₳Rationale
I like this proposal, so I vote yes.
- Yes8.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes6.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes4.4K ₳No rationale
- Yes1.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes1.2K ₳Rationale
I hope the same is done for us all if such a bug was to occur. I agree he is due his funds back.
- Yes329.6 ₳No rationale
- Yes123.6 ₳No rationale
- Yes10.2 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale
- Abstain0 ₳No rationale