Update Constitutional Committee 2026
1mo ago7 posts
Discussed in the Governance Review for epochs 650 to 652.
338 SPOs voted · 14 with a rationale · 1 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- AbstainNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesNo rationale
- YesRationale
すでに選挙で選ばれた候補者を、正式に憲法委員へ任命するための投票です。候補者を選び直すものではなく、選挙結果をオンチェーンに反映するための追認なので、基本的にYes以外を選ぶ理由はありません。//This vote is to formally appoint the candidates who have already been elected to the Constitutional Committee. It is not a vote to select the candidates again, but rather to ratify and reflect the election results on-chain. Therefore, I see no reason to vote other than Yes.
- YesNo rationale