Withdraw ₳212,000 for AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer

System1y ago1 post

165 DReps voted · 54 with a rationale · 4 changed their vote

Open a row to read the rationale.

  • Yes46.5K ₳Rationale

    I voted YES on all 39 Governance Actions — 39 times, 39 votes.

    Since I supported these during Ekklesia and saw no major changes or conflicts of interest, I stand by those decisions now. For proposals with large budgets, I paid extra attention to the justification and scope. Voting isn’t just a click — it’s a responsibility. I own mine, for myself and for our CASIA community.

  • Yes45.2K ₳No rationale
  • Yes36.3K ₳No rationale
  • Yes36.3K ₳Rationale

    ✅ Vote: YES on the AdaStat.net Treasury Proposal

    I’m supporting continued funding for AdaStat.net, one of the most reliable and user-friendly Cardano blockchain explorers since the Shelley Incentivized Testnet.

    Why this matters:
    • 📊 Real-time access to block production, stake pool stats, and governance data
    • 📱 Mobile-optimized, blazing-fast interface using Vue.js + Tailwind
    • 🛠️ Free, open REST API for devs building Cardano tooling
    • ⚖️ Decentralized transparency — we need multiple high-quality explorers, not just one

    This proposal keeps AdaStat funded and maintained for the next 24 months — with improvements for governance visibility, better UI, and more.

    Solid infrastructure. Experienced team. Real utility for SPOs, DReps, and users alike.

    Let’s keep supporting open tools that make Cardano more usable, transparent, and decentralized.

    #Cardano #Governance #AdaStat #DReps #OnChainData #VoteYES

  • No14.3K ₳No rationale
  • Yes6.7K ₳No rationale
  • Yes4.8K ₳No rationale
  • Yes1.6K ₳No rationale
  • Yes335.3 ₳No rationale
  • Yes13.5 ₳No rationale
  • Yes6.3 ₳No rationale
  • Yes0 ₳No rationale
  • Yes0 ₳No rationale
  • Yes0 ₳No rationale
  • Yes0 ₳No rationale