Withdraw ₳212,000 for AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer

System1y ago1 post

On-chain changes

  • 212,000 ₳paid tostake17xz...6ghh5qjr

Abstract

This treasury withdrawal funds AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer which will provide the following services:

We propose to continue development and support of the AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer for the next 24 months. Planned work includes performance optimizations, improvements to UX/UI, and new features related to Cardano's evolving governance model and on-chain tooling.

The frontend is developed using Vue.js and Tailwind CSS, which allows very small bundle size and fast loading time on different devices. The backend is built on Node.js and PostgreSQL, combining standard DB-Sync tables with custom-optimized indexes for high-speed data access. This dual approach enables advanced search and filtering across both on-chain and off-chain metadata --- including DRep names, stake pool tickers, token labels, and more.

Infrastructure is horizontally scalable. Multiple backend servers work behind load balancer and handle traffic based on real-time utilization. This gives high availability and stable performance, even during peak usage.

This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process.

This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.

Motivation & rationale

This proposal aims to solve the following problem:

It's still a challenge to provide Cardano blockchain data in a way that's both decentralized and easy to use. Blockchain explorers are key tools in solving this issue, as they provide access to information about blocks, transactions, stake pools, governance activities, and other on-chain operations. However, each explorer is also potential point of centralization --- it can fail, or show incorrect data. Because of this, it is important for ecosystem to have several independent, performant, and open-source explorers.

AdaStat.net supports this goal by providing real-time, mobile-optimized, and feature-rich explorer for Cardano. Maintaining and improving AdaStat directly strengthens the ecosystem infrastructure, increase transparency of data, and offer valuable tool for SPOs, DReps, CC members, developers, and everyday users.

Project Solution

  1. For SPOs: Real-time access to block production and stake pool performance, without delays from epoch boundaries or outdated data.

  2. For DReps and CC members: Tools for tracking governance activities and accessing voting-related data in clear and transparent way.

  3. For developers: Access to fully free REST API that provides Cardano data in easy-to-use JSON format --- helpful for building tools, dashboards, or integrating blockchain data into other applications.

  4. For general users: The site works smoothly on all devices, and we keep improving it based on user feedback.

  5. For the Cardano ecosystem: AdaStat is a lightweight and open tool that helps Cardano stay decentralized and easy to understand - especially for new users. All of this helps Cardano grow: stronger infrastructure, clearer data, and better long-term adoption.

Vendor Profile

AdaStat.net has been actively developed and maintained since Shelley Incentivized Testnet in 2019, with consistent uptime, feature updates, and strong organic community usage. The team has years of experience working with Cardano node, DB-Sync, performance tuning, database optimization, and community engagement. This shows that we've been consistently improving the project over the years, and we plan to keep doing so.

Contract Management

A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between the Vendor and the Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the constitution, and will be administered by Intersect. This will include details of the project delivery schedule and dispute resolution.

Project Delivery

All milestones, acceptance criteria, payment amounts and expected delivery dates will be agreed between the Vendor and Intersect, acting on behalf of the CDH. The vendor will deliver according to the agreed-upon project schedule within the Legal Contract, of which the necessary information will be made public via the budget management platform via transaction metadata.

Defined by the milestones within a Legal Contract, the vendor will submit and attest milestone acceptance to the community, Intersect or 3rd Party Assurer.

Project progress will be monitored via Intersect's delivery assurance function which will be communicated to the community.

Acceptance of the above work is expected to be supported by a 3rd Party Assurer, who will be responsible for reviewing and signing off the work completed at each project milestone against the corresponding milestone deliverables detailed within the Legal Contract. This work is funded from a portion of this treasury withdrawal.

Budget Management Tooling

To administrate treasury funds on-chain, Intersect will utilize the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs. The smart contracts have been extensively tested including audits from TxPipe and MLabs. Examples of the usage of these contracts can be seen across mainnet described across Intersect authored Blog 1, Blog 2 and Blog 3.

Final mainnet validation test can be seen via the Disburse action within transaction: 0f591dc544ae14102dbb4a74d5311a6acffc1772b163d8b7a9656b9525950b17

With the confirmed treasury reserve contract address being: stake17xzc8pt7fgf0lc0x7eq6z7z6puhsxmzktna7dluahrj6g6ghh5qjr

Specifics

Intersect will utilize a single Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with many Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC), managed by Intersect. Intersect's management consists of three 'admin' and two Intersect 'leadership' roles. An Oversight Committee consisting of five external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSCs will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.

The Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, Xerberus and NMKR. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.

For all details on Intersect's configuration please see the Smart Contract Guide on the knowledgebase.

The high level permissions are as follows:

  • TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify

    • Two of the three Intersect admins, two of the five trusted entities and one of the two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Disperse

    • Two of three Intersect admins, three of five trusted entities and two of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Pause and Resume

    • Two of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Sweep

    • One of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
  • TRSC Reorganize

    • Two of three Intersect admins and three of five trusted entities must authorize

Processes

Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. All instances of TRSC and PSSC can not be staked with a SPO and will be delegated to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. From here funds will be withdrawn into a UTxO remaining at the TRSC.

When the Legal contract is prepared and the vendor is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.

A dashboard will be available for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain.

The subsections; Contract Management, Project Delivery, and Budget Management Tooling described above cover the constitutional requirements specified in Article IV section 4 and 5.

Rationale highlights

Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words.

  • Yes584.2M ₳

    Summary Yoroi votes Yes for AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer with supporting rationale below. Rationale Reliable infrastructure. AdaStat is a long-running and trusted tool in the Cardano space, used regularly by SPOs, DReps, and community members....

    Summary
    Yoroi votes Yes for AdaStat.net Cardano blockchain explorer with supporting rationale below.

    Rationale

    • Reliable infrastructure. AdaStat is a long-running and trusted tool in the Cardano space, used regularly by SPOs, DReps, and community members.

    • Governance visibility. The explorer offers practical tools that support Cardano’s evolving governance process.

    • Privacy-first design. No ads, tracking, or monetization—aligning well with Yoroi’s commitment to user security and autonomy.

    Yoroi supports this proposal to maintain ecosystem resilience, improve governance transparency, and empower users through better access to data.

  • Yes435.8M ₳

    I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that. There are no significant matters that affect the...

    I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that.

    There are no significant matters that affect the neutrality of my decision-making.

    Detailed rationale and the improvements I would like to see made to the proposal are attached in the following spreadsheet "TW vote #01" or PDF.

    Specifically with regards to bundled proposals, next time I would request that one of the following be implemented:

    1. Bundled proposals should be subject to a temperature check vote for each item.
    2. I would like bundled proposals to be verified or created by entities, consortia, or individuals selected by the DRep.

    Spreadsheet:
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharing

    PDF:
    ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a

    私はCardanoが数十億人の経済アイデンティティを支えるプラットフォームへ成長していくために必要な投票を行います。この提案書は、それを達成するために必要な事項を実現するための正当なコストを請求しています。

    私の意思決定の中立性に影響を与える重大な事項はありません。

    根拠の詳細と、提案書について私が改善して欲しい点は、次のスプレッドシートの「TW vote #01」またはPDFに添付されています。

    特に、バンドル型提案書に関しては、次回は、次のいずれかが実施されることをリクエストします。

    1. バンドル型提案書は、内訳別の温度チェックの投票を行うこと。
2. バンドル型提案書は、DRepにより選出されるエンティティやコンソーシアムや個人により、検証または作成されるようにして欲しいと思います。

    Spreadsheet:
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharing

    PDF:
    ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a

  • No26.3M ₳

    We already have tools like Cexplorer and Tempo supporting governance actions. If a new product is to be developed in this space, Catalyst is the appropriate avenue for funding and evaluation. Also, if you plan to create a standard solution, then try to...

    We already have tools like Cexplorer and Tempo supporting governance actions. If a new product is to be developed in this space, Catalyst is the appropriate avenue for funding and evaluation.

    Also, if you plan to create a standard solution, then try to partner with existing projects using DB-Sync to read metadata.

  • No1.8M ₳

    I am voting No. The ecosystem already benefits from multiple well-maintained explorers—some of which operate without Treasury support. Funding AdaStat risks creating unfair advantages and distorting healthy competition in a decentralized ecosystem. Treasury...

    I am voting No. The ecosystem already benefits from multiple well-maintained explorers—some of which operate without Treasury support. Funding AdaStat risks creating unfair advantages and distorting healthy competition in a decentralized ecosystem. Treasury funds should be reserved for uniquely strategic or underserved infrastructure—this proposal does not meet that threshold.

See all 54 rationales