Withdraw ₳750,000 for Cardano Product Committee: Community-driven 2030 Carda...
On-chain changes
- 750,000 ₳paid tostake17xz...6ghh5qjr
Abstract
This treasury withdrawal funds Cardano Product Committee: Community-driven 2030 Cardano Vision and 2026 roadmap insights collection via workshops and structured product research which will provide the following services:
One of the key community goals in 2025 is to create a shared long-term vision, transitioning from the roadmap created by Cardano's founders to a community-led dynamic vision and yearly roadmap.
To create the first community driven 2030 Cardano vision, and a following 2026 roadmap, the Cardano Product Committee of Intersect, via consultation, has drafted a strategy (which is already operational) which includes both broad consultation via workshops (remote and in-person) and focused insights collection via focus group calls, with key ecosystem stakeholders (like SPOs) and businesses (both in Cardano and outside Cardano), and incentivized structured user and market research with an initial set of broad questions divided by the broad Cardano goals. https://productcommittee.docs.intersectmbo.org/committee-outcomes/2025-cardanos-roadmap/2025-proposed-cardano-goals
This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process.
This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.
Motivation & rationale
This proposal aims to solve the following problem:
The original Cardano roadmap, set by Cardano's founders, ended with the age of Voltaire. Now it's time to define an open, shared, and transparent process for the Cardano community to define a long-term vision and a roadmap.
Creating a long-term vision in a small group is not easy, and it gets more complex as more stakeholders participate. One of Cardano's strengths is its community-shared mind, so the challenge is to define a reusable process to leverage Cardano's shared mind to create a long-term vision for Cardano and make it operational.
Furthermore, as Cardano advances toward a maturing ecosystem, its future hinges on informed decision-making. However, the ecosystem currently lacks a dedicated, rigorous, and consolidated product research function to guide these decisions across themes such as user adoption, developer onboarding, governance participation, competitive positioning, and broader awareness. This absence limits our ability to reliably measure barriers, understand emerging needs, and identify product-market fit opportunities.
Cardano overall, and builders across the ecosystem, operate without a shared, research-backed understanding of what users actually need or how to prioritize strategic direction. Existing insights are scattered or outdated, and there is no ecosystem-wide standard for how assumptions are challenged or validated. This creates the risk of fragmentation as well as solutions that don't address real user pain points or market gaps.
Project Solution
The outcome of this proposal is a 2030 community-driven vision for Cardano, a 2026 proposed roadmap, and the first consolidated product research effort in Cardano. This will be achieved by providing clear paths for the broader Cardano community to participate in the 2030 vision creation process---both by contributing insights as key stakeholders and by enabling the collection of additional input through structured user and customer interviews, along with targeted product research initiatives.
Key Outcomes and value this proposal will deliver:
Broad community participation in the first community-driven Cardano vision creation process
Documented insights from the community shared brain
Documented insights from key groups (such as SPOs, builders, and businesses in and outside of Cardano and Blockchain)
Participation in creating and critiquing the first draft proposal for a 2030 Cardano vision
Creation of the first framework and consolidated data set of insights coming from product research guiding Cardano (and builders on Cardano) on what are the most prominent user needs and the key market opportunities
Opportunities to access funding to run product research initiatives
Identify promising focus areas for Cardano to achieve product-market-fit, which can be coordinated with the Technical Steering Committee of Intersect to ultimately identify mission-critical Cardano feature sets
Vendor Profile
Intersect is a non-profit member-based organization incorporated in Wyoming, USA. The team at Intersect represents a broad mix of experience and domain expertise, spanning open source, governance, infrastructure, fintech, and decentralized systems. Many of our team members are long-standing contributors to Cardano and are deeply embedded in the ecosystem - both professionally and as community participants.
The Cardano Product Committee of Intersect is made of members' elected product experts with knowledge in business, market research, and user research. The committee is also supported by academic researchers and it will consult Subject Matter Experts to define research initiatives and allocate funds in an open and transparent process to expert providers, as well as to properly document and share all the collected insights.
Contract Management
A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between the Vendor and Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the Constitution. Intersect will administer the contract on behalf of its members and in alignment with governance actions approved by DReps. This includes coordinating project delivery schedules, reporting progress transparently to our members and the community, and escalating any disputes to the Governing Board and membership for resolution in accordance with established procedures.
Project Delivery
A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between the Vendor and Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the Constitution. Intersect will administer the contract on behalf of its members and in alignment with governance actions approved by DReps. This includes coordinating project delivery schedules, reporting progress transparently to our members and the community, and escalating any disputes to the Governing Board and membership for resolution in accordance with established procedures. Members of the elected Product Committee will provide the necessary checks and assurance on milestone acceptance.
Project progress will also be monitored via Intersect's delivery assurance function which will be communicated to the community.
Acceptance of the above work is expected to be supported by a 3rd Party Assurer, who will be responsible for reviewing and signing off the work completed at each project milestone against the corresponding milestone deliverables detailed within the Legal Contract. This work is funded from a portion of this treasury withdrawal.
Budget Management Tooling
To administrate treasury funds on-chain, Intersect will utilize the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs. The smart contracts have been extensively tested including audits from TxPipe and MLabs. Examples of the usage of these contracts can be seen across mainnet described across Intersect authored Blog 1, Blog 2 and Blog 3.
Final mainnet validation test can be seen via the Disburse action within transaction: 0f591dc544ae14102dbb4a74d5311a6acffc1772b163d8b7a9656b9525950b17
With the confirmed treasury reserve contract address being: stake17xzc8pt7fgf0lc0x7eq6z7z6puhsxmzktna7dluahrj6g6ghh5qjr
Specifics
Intersect will utilize a single Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with many Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC), managed by Intersect. Intersect's management consists of three 'admin' and two Intersect 'leadership' roles. An Oversight Committee consisting of five external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSCs will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.
The Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, Xerberus and NMKR. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.
For all details on Intersect's configuration please see the Smart Contract Guide on the knowledge base.
The high level permissions are as follows:
TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify
- Two of the three Intersect admins, two of the five trusted entities and one of the two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Disperse
- Two of three Intersect admins, three of five trusted entities and two of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Pause and Resume
- Two of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Sweep
- One of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Reorganize
- Two of three Intersect admins and three of five trusted entities must authorize
Processes
Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. All instances of TRSC and PSSC can not be staked with a SPO and will be delegated to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. From here funds will be withdrawn into a UTxO remaining at the TRSC.
When the Legal contract is prepared and the vendor is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.
A dashboard will be available for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain.
The subsections; Contract Management, Project Delivery, and Budget Management Tooling described above cover the constitutional requirements specified in Article IV section 4 and 5.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words.
Summary Yoroi votes YES on the governance action to support the Cardano Product Committee: Community-driven 2030 Cardano Vision and 2026 Roadmap Insights Collection through workshops and structured product research. Rationale Brings focus to product-market...
Summary
Yoroi votes YES on the governance action to support the Cardano Product Committee: Community-driven 2030 Cardano Vision and 2026 Roadmap Insights Collection through workshops and structured product research.
Rationale
Brings focus to product-market fit:
Establishes a research-based foundation to better understand real user needs, making Cardano more competitive and impactful.
Enables an inclusive, community-shaped strategy:
Empowers stakeholders across regions to contribute directly to Cardano’s future vision through open consultations and workshops.
Strong execution capability:
The Intersect Product Committee has already demonstrated leadership in organizing consultations and aligning ecosystem needs, making them well-suited to scale this initiative.
Yoroi supports this proposal as a step toward providing clarity and a strong community voice in guiding Cardano's long-term direction.
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that. There are no significant matters that affect the...
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that.
There are no significant matters that affect the neutrality of my decision-making.
Detailed rationale and the improvements I would like to see made to the proposal are attached in the following spreadsheet "TW vote #01" or PDF.
Specifically with regards to bundled proposals, next time I would request that one of the following be implemented:
- Bundled proposals should be subject to a temperature check vote for each item.
- I would like bundled proposals to be verified or created by entities, consortia, or individuals selected by the DRep.
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a私はCardanoが数十億人の経済アイデンティティを支えるプラットフォームへ成長していくために必要な投票を行います。この提案書は、それを達成するために必要な事項を実現するための正当なコストを請求しています。
私の意思決定の中立性に影響を与える重大な事項はありません。
根拠の詳細と、提案書について私が改善して欲しい点は、次のスプレッドシートの「TW vote #01」またはPDFに添付されています。
特に、バンドル型提案書に関しては、次回は、次のいずれかが実施されることをリクエストします。
- バンドル型提案書は、内訳別の温度チェックの投票を行うこと。 2. バンドル型提案書は、DRepにより選出されるエンティティやコンソーシアムや個人により、検証または作成されるようにして欲しいと思います。
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5aAs with all Intersect-related governance matters, I believe such initiatives should originate from individuals who have been elected on-chain. I would support this type of proposal—but only if it comes from legitimately elected representatives. All...
As with all Intersect-related governance matters, I believe such initiatives should originate from individuals who have been elected on-chain. I would support this type of proposal—but only if it comes from legitimately elected representatives.
All committees should undergo reform to ensure transparent governance, with onchain elected members who present a clear strategy and corresponding budget.
In line with this position, and for the sake of consistency, I am voting NO on this proposal.
I have nothing against the committee members listed on this proposal. However, this Cardano Product Committee might create a similar problem to what we see in USA politics today where voters can only choose between a Republican elite sanctioned candidate or...
I have nothing against the committee members listed on this proposal. However, this Cardano Product Committee might create a similar problem to what we see in USA politics today where voters can only choose between a Republican elite sanctioned candidate or a Democrat elite sanctioned candidate.
Imagine if a select small clique get to influence the agenda of meetings and topics discussed in order to massage the items considered as options for the roadmap. Eventually, DReps might feel pressured to vote for committee sanctioned roadmap options feeling they were freely selected by the community absent committee influence. Voting this through will deliver special powers to Cardano Product Committee members allowing them to heavily influence what options are considered, debated, and ultimately voted on, for the roadmap.
It would be better to spend this money on developing a decentralised mechanism to gather and curate raw community sentiment.