Withdraw ₳5,885,000 for OSC Budget Proposal - Paid Open Source Model...
On-chain changes
- 5,885,000 ₳paid tostake17xz...6ghh5qjr
Abstract
This treasury withdrawal funds OSC Budget Proposal - Paid Open Source Model for Sustainable Development which will provide the following services:
The Open Source Committee in conjunction with the Open Source Office (OSO) seeks to enact a Paid Open Source Model for Sustainable Development in Cardano. A budget proposal of ₳5,885,000, designed to ensure the long-term sustainability of open-source development within the Cardano ecosystem. This initiative will be managed by the Open Source Committee (OSC) pending approval by the DReps, and seeks to address the critical funding gaps that hinder the maintenance, security, and growth of essential open-source projects.
This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the Open Source Committee. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process.
This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by also providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.
Motivation & rationale
This proposal aims to solve the following problem: Cardano's open-source ecosystem is critical to the network's long-term success, yet it lacks structured funding to support its growth. Unlike other blockchain ecosystems that provide clear financial backing for maintainers, contributors, and security efforts, Cardano's open-source projects often rely on ad-hoc funding or volunteer efforts.
This has led to several challenges:
Unmaintained Core Infrastructure: Key open-source repositories, including those used by dApp developers and the broader ecosystem, lack dedicated funding for long-term maintenance.
Loss of Contributors: Without clear incentives, experienced developers leave for other ecosystems, making it harder to sustain projects and onboard new talent.
Security Risks: A lack of structured funding for bug bounties and incident response leaves Cardano exposed to vulnerabilities that could otherwise be proactively addressed.
Slower Ecosystem Growth: The absence of stable funding for new tools, developer education, and strategic project support makes it difficult to keep pace with industry advancements.
Why This Matters
If Cardano wants to remain a competitive, developer-friendly blockchain, it must invest in the sustainability of its open-source infrastructure. Without structured funding, key projects will stagnate, developer engagement will decline, and security risks will increase.
A well-supported open-source ecosystem ensures:
Reliable infrastructure for wallets, dApps, and developer tooling.
More engaged developers who have clear pathways to contribute and earn.
Stronger security with funding for bug bounties and incident response.
A faster-growing ecosystem where teams can build with confidence, knowing key tools and services are actively maintained.
Project Solution
The Solution: The Paid Open Source Model
This budget proposal introduces a Paid Open Source Model to ensure that essential open-source projects receive structured funding. It includes:
A Maintainer Retainer Program to fund developers maintaining critical repositories.
Bug bounty and security initiatives to identify and fix vulnerabilities.
Developer advocacy and engagement programs to onboard and retain contributors.
An incubation framework to support promising open-source projects and help them scale.
By implementing this model, Cardano will create a predictable, transparent, and sustainable funding mechanism that supports long-term open-source development, improves security, and accelerates ecosystem growth.
Key Objectives & Strategic Impact
Sustainable Open-Source Development: Funding for 50+ key projects via the Maintainer Retainer Program ensures continuous innovation and maintenance of mission-critical repositories.
Developer Onboarding & Retention: Programs like Cardano Summer of Code, Code For Us, and Developer Advocates provide clear pathways for new and experienced contributors to engage in Cardano development.
Security & Infrastructure Reliability: Investments in Bug Bounties, Incident Monitoring, and Tooling Sustainability safeguard the network and strengthen ecosystem resilience.
Commercialization & Ecosystem Growth: The Accelerator Research Program and Expanded Project Support Services transition promising projects from incubation to sustainable businesses.
Community Engagement & Governance: The OSC ensures transparent fund allocation, performance monitoring, and open participation for contributors across Cardano.
Vendor Profile
Intersect is a non-profit member-based organization incorporated in Wyoming, USA. The team at Intersect represents a broad mix of experience and domain expertise, spanning open source, governance, infrastructure, fintech, and decentralized systems. Many of our team members are long-standing contributors to Cardano and are deeply embedded in the ecosystem - both professionally and as community participants.
This proposal will be facilitated and coordinated by Intersect, with the Open Source Committee and our dedicated Open Source Program Office supporting the execution.
Contract Management
A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between the Vendor and the Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the constitution, and will be administered by Intersect. This will include details of the project delivery schedule and dispute resolution.
Project Delivery
A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between the Vendor and Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the Constitution. Intersect will administer the contract on behalf of its members and in alignment with governance actions approved by DReps. This includes coordinating project delivery schedules, reporting progress transparently to our members and the community, and escalating any disputes to the Governing Board and membership for resolution in accordance with established procedures. Members of the elected Open Source Committee will provide the necessary checks and assurance on milestone acceptance.
Project progress will also be monitored via Intersect's delivery assurance function which will be communicated to the community.
Acceptance of the above work is expected to be supported by a 3rd Party Assurer, who will be responsible for reviewing and signing off the work completed at each project milestone against the corresponding milestone deliverables detailed within the Legal Contract. This work is funded from a portion of this treasury withdrawal.
Budget Management Tooling
To administrate treasury funds on-chain, Intersect will utilize the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs. The smart contracts have been extensively tested including audits from TxPipe and MLabs. Examples of the usage of these contracts can be seen across mainnet described across Intersect authored Blog 1, Blog 2 and Blog 3.
Final mainnet validation test can be seen via the Disburse action within transaction: 0f591dc544ae14102dbb4a74d5311a6acffc1772b163d8b7a9656b9525950b17
With the confirmed treasury reserve contract address being: stake17xzc8pt7fgf0lc0x7eq6z7z6puhsxmzktna7dluahrj6g6ghh5qjr
Specifics
Intersect will utilize a single Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with many Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC), managed by Intersect. Intersect's management consists of three 'admin' and two Intersect 'leadership' roles. An Oversight Committee consisting of five external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSCs will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.
The Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, Xerberus and NMKR. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.
For all details on Intersect's configuration please see the Smart Contract Guide on the knowledge base.
The high level permissions are as follows:
TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify
- Two of the three Intersect admins, two of the five trusted entities and one of the two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Disperse
- Two of three Intersect admins, three of five trusted entities and two of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Pause and Resume
- Two of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Sweep
- One of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Reorganize
- Two of three Intersect admins and three of five trusted entities must authorize
Processes
Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. All instances of TRSC and PSSC can not be staked with a SPO and will be delegated to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. From here funds will be withdrawn into a UTxO remaining at the TRSC.
When the Legal contract is prepared and the vendor is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.
A dashboard will be available for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain.
The subsections; Contract Management, Project Delivery, and Budget Management Tooling described above cover the constitutional requirements specified in Article IV section 4 and 5.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words.
Summary Yoroi votes YES on the governance action titled OSC Budget Proposal – Paid Open Source Model for Sustainable Development. Rationale Maintenance & continuity: The Maintainer Retainer Program addresses the issue of underfunded open-source...
Summary
Yoroi votes YES on the governance action titled OSC Budget Proposal – Paid Open Source Model for Sustainable Development.Rationale
Maintenance & continuity: The Maintainer Retainer Program addresses the issue of underfunded open-source infrastructure.
Ecosystem-wide benefit: Tools maintained and built under this model benefit both users and developers, including wallets like Yoroi.
Inclusive developer path: Programs such as Code For Us and Summer of Code make it easier for new developers to contribute and grow within Cardano.
Security focus: Proactive allocation for bug bounties and incident monitoring adds an important layer of resilience.
Yoroi supports this budget as a foundational step toward strengthening Cardano’s open-source future and developer retention across the ecosystem.
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that. There are no significant matters that affect the...
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that.
There are no significant matters that affect the neutrality of my decision-making.
Detailed rationale and the improvements I would like to see made to the proposal are attached in the following spreadsheet "TW vote #01" or PDF.
Specifically with regards to bundled proposals, next time I would request that one of the following be implemented:
- Bundled proposals should be subject to a temperature check vote for each item.
- I would like bundled proposals to be verified or created by entities, consortia, or individuals selected by the DRep.
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a私はCardanoが数十億人の経済アイデンティティを支えるプラットフォームへ成長していくために必要な投票を行います。この提案書は、それを達成するために必要な事項を実現するための正当なコストを請求しています。
私の意思決定の中立性に影響を与える重大な事項はありません。
根拠の詳細と、提案書について私が改善して欲しい点は、次のスプレッドシートの「TW vote #01」またはPDFに添付されています。
特に、バンドル型提案書に関しては、次回は、次のいずれかが実施されることをリクエストします。
- バンドル型提案書は、内訳別の温度チェックの投票を行うこと。 2. バンドル型提案書は、DRepにより選出されるエンティティやコンソーシアムや個人により、検証または作成されるようにして欲しいと思います。
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5aThe vote for this withdrawal is NO. Details can be found in the rationale. A PDF version of this rationale is also made available. I plan to vote YES on most projects I’ve supported in Ekklesia. To stay transparent, I’ll rate each project across six...
The vote for this withdrawal is NO. Details can be found in the rationale.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
I plan to vote YES on most projects I’ve supported in Ekklesia. To stay transparent, I’ll rate each project across six categories, scoring 0 to 2 per category (max 12 points). Projects scoring below 6 won’t get my support. I’ll consider supporting those with 7–8 points, and will fully support any scoring 9 or more.
The categories are:
- Key infrastructure, research, or essential funding: 0
- Team strength, feasibility, and track record: 1
- Impact on the Cardano ecosystem: 1
- Value for money: 0
- Cost compared to similar proposals: 1
- Personal or community usage and benefit: 1
Total score: 4
Similar to my vote on Intersect, I question the current approach of the Open Source Committee (OSC). Its members were not elected on-chain, and I believe a broader reform of the governance model surrounding such committees is needed. In my view, every...
Similar to my vote on Intersect, I question the current approach of the Open Source Committee (OSC). Its members were not elected on-chain, and I believe a broader reform of the governance model surrounding such committees is needed.
In my view, every committee—particularly those with strategic or budgetary responsibilities—should be led by an elected board. That board should then be responsible for proposing a clear strategic plan and corresponding budget.
While I fully support the development of open-source capabilities within Cardano, funding decisions should be made with greater transparency and granularity. Rather than approving a single allocation of 5.8 million ADA, I believe each item should be voted on individually, with proper structure and visibility.
For these reasons, I am voting NO on the current proposal.