Withdraw ₳300,000 for Ledger App Rewrite administered by Intersect
On-chain changes
- 300,000 ₳paid tostake17xz...6ghh5qjr
Abstract
This treasury withdrawal funds Ledger App Rewrite which will provide the following services:
Vacuum Labs will work with Ledger team to design new UI according to the expectations. Implement new UI into the Cardano Ledger App. Pass the external audit process (costs for this shall be included in proposal). Support the Ledger team by the release process.
This Treasury Withdrawal is submitted by Intersect on behalf of the vendor. The following sections; Abstract, Motivation, Rationale and Vendor Profile have been sourced from the approved proposal submitted by the Vendor as part of the Intersect budget process.
This treasury withdrawal funds one of 39 proposals to give effect to the approved budget info action for ₳275,269,340, administered by Intersect via gov_action1u9x73kwufaxa70lfy59g4ynwyrcsaxdcd0gxzzmh67s9fxq4j8hqqk2phgh. The information provided herein is intended to fulfill the spirit of the constitutional requirement for a treasury withdrawal info action by providing the details of the proposed solution, alignment to the budget, and amount to be withdrawn from the Cardano Treasury.
Motivation & rationale
This proposal aims to solve the following problem:
In 2018 when Ledger Cardano App was developed, there was no standard for embedded app UI. Over the years this changed and now Cardano is the only Ledger application with non-standard UI such as requiring double-click several times during the confirmation process. This is causing confusion among users and problems with testing because the design is not compatible with the testing suite.
Project Solution
Ledger wallet users will have better Cardano experience. Further app updates and releases will be faster and cheaper due to Ledger testing suite compatibility.
Vendor Profile
Vacuumlabs is a technology company founded in 2013, specializing in fintech product engineering, including blockchain solutions. Within the Cardano ecosystem, they are a significant contributor, known for co-developing the AdaLite and Yoroi wallets, and contributing to Ledger and Trezor hardware wallet support for Cardano. They also incubated and launched WingRiders, a decentralized exchange (DEX) that became a leading platform on Cardano. Furthermore, Vacuumlabs actively engages in smart contract auditing and provides blockchain consulting services for fintech companies looking to integrate with Cardano.
Contract Management
A written off-chain Legal Contract will be created between the Vendor and the Cardano Development Holdings (CDH), as mandated by the constitution, and will be administered by Intersect. This will include details of the project delivery schedule and dispute resolution.
Project Delivery
All milestones, acceptance criteria, payment amounts and expected delivery dates will be agreed between the Vendor and Intersect, acting on behalf of the CDH. The vendor will deliver according to the agreed-upon project schedule within the Legal Contract, of which the necessary information will be made public via the budget management platform via transaction metadata.
Defined by the milestones within a Legal Contract, the vendor will submit and attest milestone acceptance to the community, Intersect or 3rd Party Assurer.
Project progress will be monitored via Intersect's delivery assurance function which will be communicated to the community.
Acceptance of the above work is expected to be supported by a 3rd Party Assurer, who will be responsible for reviewing and signing off the work completed at each project milestone against the corresponding milestone deliverables detailed within the Legal Contract. This work is funded from a portion of this treasury withdrawal.
Budget Management Tooling
To administrate treasury funds on-chain, Intersect will utilize the treasury management smart contract framework developed by Sundae Labs. The smart contracts have been extensively tested including audits from TxPipe and MLabs. Examples of the usage of these contracts can be seen across mainnet described across Intersect authored Blog 1, Blog 2 and Blog 3.
Final mainnet validation test can be seen via the Disburse action within transaction: 0f591dc544ae14102dbb4a74d5311a6acffc1772b163d8b7a9656b9525950b17
With the confirmed treasury reserve contract address being: stake17xzc8pt7fgf0lc0x7eq6z7z6puhsxmzktna7dluahrj6g6ghh5qjr
Specifics
Intersect will utilize a single Treasury Reserve Smart Contract (TRSC), with many Project-Specific Smart Contracts (PSSC), managed by Intersect. Intersect's management consists of three 'admin' and two Intersect 'leadership' roles. An Oversight Committee consisting of five external, independent third-party entities will provide checks and balances on Intersect, and safeguard against errors and unilateral control. The administration of both TRSC and PSSCs will be managed by Intersect, with external oversight on certain actions from the Oversight Committee.
The Oversight Committee consists of Sundae Labs, Cardano Foundation, Dquadrant, Xerberus and NMKR. Their role is to independently verify key administrative actions using on-chain logic, ensuring accuracy and consistency without exercising discretion over governance decisions.
For all details on Intersect's configuration please see the Smart Contract Guide on the knowledgebase.
The high level permissions are as follows:
TRSC Fund and PSSC Modify
- Two of the three Intersect admins, two of the five trusted entities and one of the two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Disperse
- Two of three Intersect admins, three of five trusted entities and two of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Pause and Resume
- Two of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Sweep
- One of three Intersect admins, and one of two Intersect leadership sign-off must authorize
TRSC Reorganize
- Two of three Intersect admins and three of five trusted entities must authorize
Processes
Upon enactment of this governance action, funding for this project will be directed into the TRSC's stake account. All instances of TRSC and PSSC can not be staked with a SPO and will be delegated to the auto-abstain predefined DRep. From here funds will be withdrawn into a UTxO remaining at the TRSC.
When the Legal contract is prepared and the vendor is ready, funding for this project will be transferred using the Fund action to a PSSC. All milestones will be outlined within the metadata.
A dashboard will be available for the community to audit the TRSC or PSSC and track metrics related to this withdrawn ada as well as being immutably verifiable on chain.
The subsections; Contract Management, Project Delivery, and Budget Management Tooling described above cover the constitutional requirements specified in Article IV section 4 and 5.
Rationale highlights
Why some of the largest DReps voted for and against, in their own words.
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that. There are no significant matters that affect the...
I will vote as necessary to help Cardano grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people. This proposal charges a fair price to achieve what is needed to achieve that.
There are no significant matters that affect the neutrality of my decision-making.
Detailed rationale and the improvements I would like to see made to the proposal are attached in the following spreadsheet "TW vote #01" or PDF.
Specifically with regards to bundled proposals, next time I would request that one of the following be implemented:
- Bundled proposals should be subject to a temperature check vote for each item.
- I would like bundled proposals to be verified or created by entities, consortia, or individuals selected by the DRep.
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5a私はCardanoが数十億人の経済アイデンティティを支えるプラットフォームへ成長していくために必要な投票を行います。この提案書は、それを達成するために必要な事項を実現するための正当なコストを請求しています。
私の意思決定の中立性に影響を与える重大な事項はありません。
根拠の詳細と、提案書について私が改善して欲しい点は、次のスプレッドシートの「TW vote #01」またはPDFに添付されています。
特に、バンドル型提案書に関しては、次回は、次のいずれかが実施されることをリクエストします。
- バンドル型提案書は、内訳別の温度チェックの投票を行うこと。 2. バンドル型提案書は、DRepにより選出されるエンティティやコンソーシアムや個人により、検証または作成されるようにして欲しいと思います。
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M8JAuAntJOa7Z6j3GfC2hWFl4kbZLkzEel_cN4-kymw/edit?usp=sharingPDF:
ipfs://bafkreianp5xhbo3ojlxqjjah4kyimr6u62uwnxd2t3lwwu3qmpn4jf4n5aSummary EMURGO as DRep votes YES on the governance action to support the Ledger App Rewrite proposal. Rationale Ledger remains a critical access point for ADA holders worldwide, especially those prioritizing hardware wallet security. This proposal addresses...
Summary
EMURGO as DRep votes YES on the governance action to support the Ledger App Rewrite proposal.Rationale
Ledger remains a critical access point for ADA holders worldwide, especially those prioritizing hardware wallet security. This proposal addresses long-standing UX inconsistencies within the Cardano Ledger app, aligning it with modern standards and streamlining the user journey.We believe that Vacuumlabs is well-positioned to carry out this work. Combined with their separate proposal on long-term hardware wallet maintenance, this rewrite ensures both compatibility with Ledger’s testing suite and future device updates. EMURGO supports this effort as a meaningful improvement to the Cardano user experience and ecosystem reliability and therefore has voted Yes for this propposal.
The vote for this withdrawal is NO. Details can be found in the rationale. A PDF version of this rationale is also made available. I plan to vote YES on most projects I’ve supported in Ekklesia. To stay transparent, I’ll rate each project across six...
The vote for this withdrawal is NO. Details can be found in the rationale.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
I plan to vote YES on most projects I’ve supported in Ekklesia. To stay transparent, I’ll rate each project across six categories, scoring 0 to 2 per category (max 12 points). Projects scoring below 6 won’t get my support. I’ll consider supporting those with 7–8 points, and will fully support any scoring 9 or more.
The categories are:
- Key infrastructure, research, or essential funding: 2
- Team strength, feasibility, and track record: 2
- Impact on the Cardano ecosystem: 1
- Value for money: 1
- Cost compared to similar proposals: 1
- Personal or community usage and benefit: 1
Total score: 8
Following the previous vote on Ekklesia.