drep1y20s4gh7n9j88...
Badges (7)
drep1y20s4gh7n9j88... is an active Cardano DRep, registered in epoch 508. They hold 69.4K ₳ of delegated voting power, about 0.00% of the active stake. drep1y20s4gh7n9j88... has cast 27 on-chain governance votes (15 yes, 8 no, 4 abstain). Since registering, they have taken part in 27 of 136 decided actions (20%). They have published 3 rationales explaining their votes.
On-chain data as of 1d ago.
Forum activity (0)
No forum posts yet.
Voting stats
- Yes15 (56%)
- No8 (30%)
- Abstain4 (15%)
Voting history (27)
Show 22 moreShow less
NoAdd Constitutional Committee Member - ChristinaEpoch 607RationaleExpired7mo ago
Who is Christina?
Yes2025 Net Change Limit ExtensionEpoch 604RationaleClosed7mo ago
This is a no-brainer Yes. It's:
Non-controversial — no new spending authority, just timeline
Necessary — avoids a constitutional gap
Conservative — 8 epochs is modest
Well-reasoned — clearly explains the enactment delay issue
YesCardano Critical Integrations BudgetEpoch 604RationaleClosed7mo ago
I'm supportive of this initiative. Cardano's infrastructure gap is real, and the founding entities stepping up with a coordinated integration push is exactly what the ecosystem needs to compete. The inclusion of Midnight Foundation on the steering committee makes sense given the cross-chain synergies we'll need—Midnight isn't a competitor, it's complementary infrastructure that will strengthen Cardano's position.
I'm also encouraged to see NMKR on the Oversight Committee. They've demonstrated consistent integrity in this ecosystem.
That said, I want to register one concern for the steering committee's consideration: USDM already exists on Cardano and meets tier-one criteria—it's Mehen-issued, USD-backed, and has regulatory clarity. If part of this budget is earmarked for stablecoin integration, I'd want assurance that we're not duplicating what we already have or, worse, sidelining a native solution for an external one purely based on brand recognition.
The proposal's confidentiality constraints are understandable given how these negotiations work, but I'd encourage the steering committee to publish categorical allocation ranges (oracle vs. bridge vs. stablecoin infrastructure) once contracts allow—even rough percentages would help the community understand priorities without compromising partner NDAs.
Looking forward to the treasury withdrawal details. Let's get this done before the NCL expires.