Cardano Budget Process Framework (facilitated by Intersect)
174 DReps voted · 68 with a rationale · 4 changed their vote · 4 re-voted unchanged
Open a row to read the rationale.
Changed votes: 3 to yes, 1 to no, together voting with 163M ₳ of voting power.
- Yes83.9K ₳Rationale
I am voting to support this info action. My rationale for this is based on the following:
Without a budget process, treasury withdrawals risk becoming a game of social engineering. Projects currently rely on being a big-name to secure funding. This framework introduces a layer of sifting and analysis, with the idea that projects are evaluated based on their strategic merit and technical necessity rather than their ability to generate hype.
Voting "Yes" on the Intersect framework does not imply that I agree with every granular detail of its current development. However, the ecosystem cannot afford to wait for a perfect solution while treasury management remains unstructured. It is an iterative step and the process can and should be refined as we gather data on its effectiveness.
For anyone not intimately aware of how projects get funded, every specific treasury withdrawal will still require a formal vote by DReps. This framework simply organizes the information and prioritizes requests so that DReps can make more informed decisions.
While Intersect is facilitating this framework, my support is also a signal that Cardano needs structured budget proposals. In the future, I hope to see multiple entities, not just Intersect, putting forward competing or ideally complementary budget frameworks. - Yes65.9K ₳No rationale
- Yes56.4K ₳Rationale
I find value in the Intersect led Cardano Budget Process Framework. I vote YES.
Lourde DRep Ouroborus Imperator Aeternalis - Yes56.1K ₳Rationale
The budget process is still terrible, but intersect is doing a fine job.
- No51.8K ₳Rationale
Given the current CC debates and how Interect working create doubts for me for this facitilitating role
- Yes48.7K ₳Rationale
agreed//
- Yes48K ₳No rationale
- No45.3K ₳No rationale
- Yes29.3K ₳No rationale
- No26.7K ₳Rationale
Let people propose their budgets on gov.tools. Don't do this. Remove the 100k ADA barrier.
- Abstain15.8K ₳No rationale
- Abstain15.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes10.7K ₳Rationale
i'm like proposal so i vote yes
- Yes6.8K ₳No rationale
- No4.1K ₳No rationale
- No3.6K ₳No rationale
- Abstain3.4K ₳Rationale
The framework is promising but still raises uncertainties regarding centralization, complexity, and inclusivity. Further development and feedback are needed before providing clear support.
- Yes688.8 ₳No rationale
- Yes619.5 ₳No rationale
- Yes167.1 ₳No rationale
- NoRevoted99.5 ₳History
Earlier votes
No5mo agoSuperseded
- AbstainRevoted4 ₳History
Earlier votes
Abstain5mo agoSuperseded
- No0 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale