Reduce minimum Constitutional Committee size (committeeMinSize) from 7 to 5

System7mo ago1 post

1 of 7 committee members voted

  • KtorZ64f97568…3a49
    YesExpired · term ends epoch 653Rationale

    Ok

    This proposal does not violate the constitution in any ways. Although it is quite "light" on the arguments and rationale, the change is quite benign and thus requires little justification. So I'll leave it up to DReps to decide whether they feel convinced by the justification.

    Beside, it is worth noting that the constitution requires critical parameter changes to be submitted off-chain at least 90 days before they are submitted on-chain. Yet, does not specify a process or additional requirements regarding the nature of the off-chain submission.

    The minimum size of the constitutional committee is a critical parameter. And, we can find several occurrences of off-chain discussions (e.g. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cgPqEUit2PPe6b_btGqiqJCLls58tLLCwECbG00wRKk/edit, https://forum.cardano.org/t/pcp-005-committeeminsize-yuta/151156) which were both seemingly published at least 91 days prior to the on-chain submission.

  • Ace Alliance71aa5b3a…8f04
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 726No rationale
  • Cardano Curia84feba94…6bd5
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 799No rationale
  • Cardano Japan Council725d4d44…7b31
    Not votedExpired · term ends epoch 653No rationale
  • Eastern Cardano Council4a822702…3d76
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 726No rationale
  • Phil_uplc68bb0b42…8746
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 799No rationale
  • Tingvard646d1b3a…be43
    Not votedActive · term ends epoch 726No rationale