drep1ytkt0vvxqlwmw...

I vote yes because 300M is the lesser evil, compared to 350M as proposed in gov_action1m3x...4jsr7q

I am voting YES on this proposal because, in my view, it addresses a structural gap that has held Cardano back for years. While the proposal is not perfect, it lacks granular detail, strong KPIs, and clear ROI modeling, the absence of these integrations has already imposed enormous opportunity costs on the ecosystem. Cardano cannot afford to continue delaying foundational infrastructure that other chains have treated as baseline utilities for years.

Cardano's growth ceiling today is defined not by its technology, but by what is missing. This budget is an attempt to correct that.

In an ideal world, the community would receive a detailed breakdown with partners, costs, and timelines. But the nature of enterprise infrastructure doesn't work that way. We must choose between:

• waiting for perfect information and losing partners, or
• moving ahead with the best structure we can design today.

Given the maturity of negotiations and the level of cross-entity collaboration, I believe moving forward is the right path.

The founding entities have stepped up, together. That unity gives me confidence. The integrations targeted here are long overdue, strategically vital, and impossible to delay further.

For these reasons, I am voting YES.

This is the way!

I believe the treasury should not fund centralized exchange's listing fees.

I believe projects should not get funded by the treasury for listings on centralized exchanges.

I believe these entities / people will serve the cardano community well. Looking forward to a new era of governance with an on-chain elected constitutional committee.

The treasury has accumulated enough funds to sustain ecosystem development for many years, making such a high tax rate unnecessary.

The tax was originally set at 5% but was increased to 20% just before Shelley's launch in 2020. It was done as a precaution, not a necessity.

Now that the treasury holds roughly 1.7 billion ADA, reducing the tax back to 10% seems like a reasonable recalibration to support it's efficiency.

A large and growing treasury can lead to less scrutiny over spending decisions since there is little pressure to allocate funds efficiently.

We must strike the right balance, and I believe 10% sounds about right.

I am voting yes to ratify the Delegate-Approved Cardano Constitution. It is time to move on from the Interim Constitution and embrace a governance model that reflects where Cardano is today and where it’s headed. This is a big step forward for Cardano’s governance!

The Interim Constitution was always meant to be temporary. A starting point to guide us while we figured out a more solid framework. Over time, the Delegate-Approved Constitution has evolved into something much stronger, shaped by community input, and a clearer vision for the future.

This isn't just a small update. It provides better structure, clearer decision-making, and a governance model that truly fits Cardano’s long-term goals. By ratifying it, we are making sure the ecosystem has a solid foundation to grow in a decentralized and transparent way.

Cheers!