Add Constitutional Committee Member - Christina
174 DReps voted · 71 with a rationale · 7 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Abstain58.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes55.9K ₳Rationale
sure. why not. even though i dont like the effective outcome of an increase in veto power, due to the two-thirds majority rule.
- No50.5K ₳No rationale
- No49.6K ₳Rationale
I find no value in this proposal due to a lack of community input and feedback. This last minute submission by a highly respected community member comes as a surprise, there is no doubt the submitted Council member applicant Christina is knowledgeable in and capable of upholding the constitution seat responsibilities; but there was no community facing discussion on the benefits and limitations of this approach to additional seat membership. I ask that this proposal is fielded to the community for future discussion and consideration.
LourdeOuroborus Imperator Aeternalis - Yes48.6K ₳Rationale
Yes. She is good
- Yes45.8K ₳Rationale
WistkeyLab is voting YES on governance action Add Constitutional Committee Member - Christina. The Constitutional Committee is currently operating close to the minimum required size. Under this condition, the temporary loss of a member due to resignation, illness, or conflict of interest could impair the committee’s ability to function and delay or block governance actions.
Adding one additional qualified member increases the committee’s operational resilience by reducing single-point-of-failure risk. This adjustment does not alter the committee’s mandate or fundamental role, but provides a buffer that helps ensure continuity and stability during critical governance periods.
From this perspective, the proposed appointment is viewed as a pragmatic measure to safeguard governance operations while maintaining the committee’s existing responsibilities and structure.
- No45.2K ₳No rationale
- Yes30.9K ₳No rationale
- Yes29.3K ₳Rationale
The more in the committee the better for decentralization and fairer voting
- No26.7K ₳Rationale
This wasn't approved through a proper election. No.
- No24.5K ₳No rationale
- Abstain15.2K ₳No rationale
- Yes10.6K ₳Rationale
I'm like this proposal, so I'm voting yes
- Yes8.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes6.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes4.4K ₳No rationale
- Abstain3.6K ₳No rationale
- No1.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes1.2K ₳Rationale
Congrats Christina!!
- Yes682 ₳No rationale
- Yes123.6 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale
- Yes0 ₳No rationale