Add Constitutional Committee Member
170 DReps voted · 60 with a rationale · 2 changed their vote · 4 re-voted unchanged
Open a row to read the rationale.
Changed votes: 1 to yes, 1 to no, together voting with 131.6M ₳ of voting power.
- Yes1.1M ₳No rationale
- Yes966.3K ₳No rationale
- Yes951.2K ₳Rationale
Voted Yes. This governance action is necessary to formally record the results of the audited Ekklesia elections on-chain and seat the remaining Constitutional Committee member.
Until all CC seats are filled, the governance system cannot function, and no governance actions can be approved. Passing this GA promptly is essential to restore full operational governance.
- Yes929.9K ₳Rationale
As we have already voted for Cardano Curia during the snap election we are happy to congratulate them with this vote.
- Yes927.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes884.5K ₳No rationale
- Yes870.3K ₳No rationale
- YesRevoted861.5K ₳History
Earlier votes
Yes9mo agoSuperseded
- Yes829.9K ₳Rationale
We support the election process to elect the new constitutional committee consortium.
- YesRevoted796.3K ₳History
Earlier votes
Yes8mo agoSuperseded
- Yes792.3K ₳Rationale
I am voting Yes on this action to add Cardano Curia to the Constitutional Committee.
The committee dropped below the minimum size after Cardano Atlantic Council stepped down. That means it cannot ratify any actions that need committee approval. Governance has been partly stalled since epoch 597. Adding the elected member lifts the committee back to the required size and restores full governance flow.
The snap election followed the same model used earlier in the year. The process was open, verifiable, and aligned with the Constitution and CIP-1694. The audited results are published, and the elected member will serve the remainder of the original term. Nothing else in the committee structure changes.
My vote supports keeping the governance system working as intended and avoiding gaps in decision making across the network.
- Yes742.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes636.4K ₳No rationale
- Yes604.7K ₳Rationale
Must be done for continuity of governance.
- Yes591.1K ₳Rationale
Approving so other votes and treasury withdrawals can continue
- Yes582.9K ₳No rationale
- Yes579.1K ₳Rationale
📌 My decision is YES. Why is this vote necessary right now?
👉 Facts
- Governance Action: Add Constitutional Committee Member
- Issue: Constitutional Committee fell below the required minimum
- Required minimum: 7 members
- Current state after resignation: 6 members
- Proposed solution: add Cardano Curia
- Term expiration: Epoch 653
- Election format: Intersect snap-election
- Participation: 88 DReps
- Voting stake represented: ~3.16B ADA
👉 Why this matters
With fewer than 7 members, the Constitutional Committee cannot:
- ratify budgets
- approve Treasury Withdrawals
- validate Net Change Limits
On-chain governance becomes partially frozen
👉 What this vote actually is
- Not ideology
- Not redistribution of funds
- Not politics
It is a technical restoration of governance functionality.
👉 My position as a DRep
- Governance must function before strategy can exist
- Delays block every critical decision
- The election followed constitutional process and was verifiable
👉 Conclusion
Without restoring the Constitutional Committee, Cardano governance does not work.
This vote re-enables the system.My vote is YES.
🚀 COURSE “LEDGER COLD CRYPTO WALLET” | METAMASK
https://edgarbagdasarian.justclick.ru/order/LEDGERMETAMASK🔥 PRIVATE VIP CHAT (PAID SUBSCRIPTION)
https://t.me/MREDGARCROSS_BOT🌐 ALL COURSES & LINKS
https://mredgarcross.com/
I am registered as a DRep and ready to help shape the future of the ecosystem.
Optimistically focused on building the largest digital community in the world. 🖤
My DRep ID: ➡️ drep1y269ehxj3...2fg2jr
More details: https://t.me/PROCENT666/338 - Yes573.2K ₳Rationale
Governance Rationale
Rationale ID: RID24920185fi39ik2039fdhe4t2wefd
Generated At:
2025-12-11T03:00:00+03:30
Generated By: govcircle.spaceAction Information
Action Title: Add Constitutional Committee Member
Action ID: gov_action1fk4nx9zhkcdcyjaudwjtnkd7gagwyhqtth2zypawkc78gvdxkuzqzcfpwyFollow DRep's Rationale:
Yoroi Wallet, YUTA, SIPO, CardanoYoda, Peter BuiVote: YES
Executive Summary
Expanding the Constitutional Committee by adding a member enhances governance agility and improves quorum resilience. This change ensures broader expertise, reduces potential bottlenecks in rapid decision-making, and strengthens the system’s capacity to measure DRep responsiveness as a KPI.
Risks & Mitigation
Risk: Equality of minimum CC member parameter with CC size can endanger governance status.
Mitigation: Reduce committeeMinSize parameter to committeeMinSize = currentCommitteeSize - 1.
Signal
Description: If this action reaches the required votes within a single epoch, it demonstrates rapid governance response and sets a benchmark for DRep engagement.
Purpose: Create KPI
Audit
- Digest:
84ad0c7a781bdad8761ada4cf0fe175920247cf0292b6e995380bf8d6263ff40 - Digest Algorithm: SHA-256
- Signatures:
- IPFS Link: https://ipfs.io/ipns/k51qzi5uqu5dinemr19bcje6d8emg9r6gmbg1j23b43zrfrcc2qm3ic42l7nko
- Digest:
- Yes568K ₳Rationale
Member was voted on and now its time to get Cardano Governance rolling again.
- Yes564.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes433.2K ₳No rationale
- Abstain379.5K ₳No rationale
- Yes371K ₳No rationale
- Yes366.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes356.1K ₳Rationale
Cardano Curia was the winner of the vote and this enactment is required by the constitution for governance to continue uninterrupted.
- Yes338.2K ₳No rationale
- Yes329.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes327.4K ₳No rationale
- Yes321.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes318.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes314.4K ₳Rationale
I vote yes for the addition of Cardano Curia to the Constitutional Committee, as ratified by the off-chain (Ekklesia) voting process.
A PDF version of this rationale is also made available.
I vote yes for the addition of Cardano Curia to the Constitutional Committee, as ratified by the off-chain (Ekklesia) voting process.
- Yes313.8K ₳Rationale
I am voting YES to this critical governance action to add a member to CC, following the election off chain of the candidate from those who put themselves forward. It is essential to restore committee member size to 7 following the resignation of one member in order to meet the mincommitteesize7 parameter..
- Yes301.3K ₳No rationale
- Yes291.8K ₳No rationale
- Yes288.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes272.2K ₳No rationale
- YesRevoted260.8K ₳History
Earlier votes
Yes8mo agoSuperseded
- Yes236.8K ₳No rationale
- Yes201.5K ₳No rationale
- Yes189.8K ₳No rationale
- Yes182.7K ₳No rationale
- Yes166.5K ₳Rationale
Need to get back to committeeMinSize, so we need this.
- Yes163K ₳No rationale
- Yes161.1K ₳No rationale
- YesRevoted138.6K ₳History
Earlier votes
Yes9mo agoSuperseded
- Yes127K ₳No rationale
- Yes126.4K ₳No rationale
- Yes124.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes90.1K ₳No rationale
- Yes83.9K ₳Rationale
This action does not require a very in depth rationale. This is a straightforward yes since we need to add the extra member of the CC on order to proceed with governance.