Info Action (15f82a36#0)
104 DReps voted · 13 with a rationale · 2 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- No435.8M ₳Rationale
Cardanoが数十億人の経済アイデンティティを支えるプラットフォームへ成長するために、この提案は不適切と考える３つの理由があります。1.次回のハードフォーク名をミームコインの名称にすると、Cardanoチェーンのブランドが低下する可能性があります。2.次回のハードフォークは非常に近い将来に起こる可能性があり、急速にハードフォーク名を変更することは混乱を引き起こす可能性があります。3.このガバナンスアクションの根拠等の記載が不十分です。There are three reasons why I believe this proposal is inappropriate for Cardano to grow into a platform that supports the economic identities of billions of people.I have specifically described them in Japanese.
- No222.9M ₳Rationale
The probability that the chain upgrade will go wrong is much higher if it is called HOSKY. We can avoid this risk by voting NO.
- Yes92.2M ₳No rationale
- No91.5M ₳No rationale
- No77.7M ₳No rationale
- No76.8M ₳No rationale
- No69.4M ₳No rationale
- Abstain62.7M ₳No rationale
- No50M ₳No rationale
- No49.5M ₳No rationale
- Yes47.6M ₳No rationale
- Abstain33.5M ₳No rationale
- No27.9M ₳Rationale
While Hosky means well, he hasn't quite maintained the peg of 0 ADA per HOSKY token. Instead, I'd like to counter with an inspirational figure who rhymes with Hosky: Manuel Sadosky. Sadosky was an Argentine pioneer in math and computer science who laid the groundwork for technology in Latin America. With the Cardano Constitution set to be signed in Argentina around the same time as the fork, I propose naming it the Sadosky Hard Fork instead.
- No27.9M ₳No rationale
- No25.3M ₳No rationale
- No21.5M ₳No rationale
- No21.5M ₳No rationale
- No19.9M ₳Rationale
Cardano hard forks were so far always named after deceased people we wanted to honour for their contributions. It feels wrong to now name our next hard fork after a meme token, especially as the next hard fork will enable full minimal viable governance functionality after CIP-1694.
- No17.3M ₳No rationale
- No16.4M ₳No rationale
- No10.8M ₳No rationale
- No8.8M ₳No rationale
- Abstain7.6M ₳Rationale
Although this is rumored to be the name-the-next-hard-fork Hosky governance action, alas it is missing data on gov.tools
Hence, I abstain.
- Abstain7.6M ₳No rationale
- No6M ₳No rationale
- No5.9M ₳No rationale
- Yes5.8M ₳No rationale
- No5.4M ₳No rationale
- No5.3M ₳No rationale
- No4.6M ₳No rationale
- No4.6M ₳No rationale
- No4.6M ₳No rationale
- No4.4M ₳No rationale
- NoChanged4.1M ₳History
Earlier votes
Abstain1y agoSuperseded
- No3.8M ₳No rationale
- No3.7M ₳No rationale
- No3.1M ₳Rationale
The data submitted for this governance action is missing. There is no external data linked, so it has either been changed since the proposal has been submitted, or is no longer available. I cannot vote yes on a governance proposal that I cannot read or that has been altered.
- No2.8M ₳No rationale
- Abstain2.8M ₳No rationale
- Abstain2.7M ₳No rationale
- No2.7M ₳No rationale
- Abstain2.6M ₳No rationale
- Abstain2.4M ₳No rationale
- Yes2.3M ₳No rationale
- No2.1M ₳No rationale
- No1.8M ₳No rationale
- No1.8M ₳No rationale
- No1.7M ₳No rationale
- Abstain1.7M ₳No rationale
- No1.6M ₳No rationale