A$Y

This is a respectful, symbolic action that honors a real contributor to Cardano. I’m happy to support it.

I support this parameter change because it’s a measured, well-tested increase that makes Plutus development easier without putting the network at risk. It’s been discussed publicly, benchmarked on testnets, and stays within all guardrails. This is a sensible step toward better scalability.

I’m voting yes on this first withdrawal because it’s about setting things up properly, not spending big money yet. The proposal clearly shows where the funds go — legal structure, smart contracts, and audits — and includes solid oversight and reporting. Having this foundation in place lets the community properly judge any larger liquidity deployment later.

I support the Net Change Limit because it helps keep stake movements gradual and avoids sudden shocks to the network. For smaller and independent pools, this kind of stability matters. It gives operators time to adapt and helps prevent stake from concentrating too quickly in a few large players. Overall, I believe this is better for decentralization and long-term network health.

I’m voting YES because keeping the net change limit in place is simply a safety measure. It protects the system from sudden or unnecessary constitutional changes while governance continues to mature. There’s no downside to extending this safeguard, and it keeps things stable.

I’m voting YES because the major Cardano groups — IOG, EMURGO, Intersect, the Foundation, and Midnight — are finally aligned on moving these critical integrations forward. It’s good to see the main players on the same page and pushing in the same direction. This budget gives them what they need to actually get the work done, so I’m supporting it.