LEADStakePool

We previously supported a lower NCL which did not pass. We are now at a point where we believe the community has spoken and we should therefore just proceed with the NCL that has been voted yes on. Additional proposals at this stage just add additional confusion and we should now just be getting on with what has been agreed

Action not complete in the correct format, which therefore makes it overally difficult for people to understand what it is about. This could influence the vote and therefore cannot vote yes in good consciousness

Node diversity has been a long time coming. An easy yes from me.

We discussed this internally with delegators who are part of our telegram channel... Our rational for voting yes is as follows:
a) Increases rewards for delegators
b) We want to see parameters tweaked and do not believe we should be afraid to try things - especially given what we have seen with other parameters such as k and a0
c) We can always change back or adjust the parameter again if needed
d) Treasury will still be sizable
e) We do not know fully yet how funds will be spent and it could be interesting to see how they go with the first round