Info Action (15f82a36#0)
104 DReps voted · 13 with a rationale · 2 changed their vote
Open a row to read the rationale.
- Yes1.6M ₳No rationale
- No1.6M ₳No rationale
- No1.4M ₳No rationale
- Abstain1.4M ₳No rationale
- No1.2M ₳No rationale
- Abstain1.2M ₳No rationale
- No931.8K ₳No rationale
- No798.4K ₳No rationale
- No794.5K ₳No rationale
- No747.4K ₳No rationale
- No717.5K ₳No rationale
- No707.1K ₳Rationale
We, the Dutch DRep, extend our gratitude to Adam Dean for submitting the first governance action, sparking the exercise of our voting rights. While this proposal is lighthearted in nature, it provides an important opportunity for the community to engage in governance.
However, after careful consideration, the Dutch DRep will vote "No" on this information action for two main reasons:
1) Neutrality of Naming: We believe that "HOSKY" does not represent the neutrality that should be associated with a hard fork event. A neutral name ensures inclusivity and professional communication within the broader ecosystem. 2) Clarity and Continuity: The name "Chang 2" is a logical continuation of "Chang 1," maintaining consistency in ongoing communications. A name change at this stage could create confusion, undermining the clarity and transparency of messaging that has already reached users and the media.In conclusion, while this proposal offers a creative approach, we prioritize neutrality and consistency in our decision-making.
- No652.3K ₳No rationale
- No625.9K ₳Rationale
I am voting no on the action proposing to name the next Cardano hard fork 'HOSKY' because it falls outside the established naming convention used to identify Cardano hard forks.
- No545.4K ₳No rationale
- No466.2K ₳No rationale
- Abstain409.1K ₳No rationale
- No385.2K ₳Rationale
While we understand the desire to honor Hoskey's contributions to Cardano, using "Hoskey" as a name for Chang 2 deviates from Cardano's established naming convention (e.g., Byron, Shelley). This could lead to confusion and potentially create bias. Let's choose a name that reflects the hardfork's significance and fosters a more inclusive name.
Best regards,
KryptoLabs.no - Abstain383K ₳No rationale
- No381.1K ₳No rationale
- No325.4K ₳No rationale
- No323.5K ₳No rationale
- No314.4K ₳Rationale
I believe "Chang" has already been widely spread as the name of this hard fork, so it's not "new" or confusing anymore. This name was chosen to honor Chang Feng, a Chinese astronomer & mathematician. So it was chosen to reflect Cardano's commitment to innovation and continuous progress as Chang Feng was a pioneer in his field. By honoring such significant figures, we not only acknowledge their contributions but also provide an opportunity for others to learn about their remarkable achievements.
- Yes298.9K ₳Rationale
sure why not name the next HF after Hosky
- Abstain294.4K ₳No rationale
- No285.3K ₳No rationale
- No279.3K ₳No rationale
- No245.5K ₳No rationale
- Yes238.6K ₳No rationale
- No235.2K ₳No rationale
- No228.3K ₳No rationale
- Abstain191.1K ₳No rationale
- No185.6K ₳Rationale
We're really here, in the Voltaire era. We're working together to decide the future of our chain.
To my dear friend Adam Dean, thanks for raising the first issue to a vote.
To the good doggo Hosky, thanks for all that you do for our chain adoption.Regrettably, I must vote to decline this proposal. I think we should continue to build our collaboration muscles and find a way to communicate on the actions we wish to raise prior to raising them.
- Abstain178.9K ₳No rationale
- No166.4K ₳No rationale
- No165.7K ₳Rationale
I am voting No towards the proposal of naming the next hard fork HOSKY. While HOSKY has undeniably contributed a lot to Cardano, with onboarding initiatives, educational work about governance and decentralization, and the support of smaller, individual SPOs (of which I am one), naming a hard fork after the project has two main issues for me.
The first one is that as an open blockchain, it might be perceived as a type of advertising, and influence people into thinking that HOSKY is an officially endorsed project. In the past, hard forks were named after individuals that have no commercial benefit from having it named after them. I believe that this should continue.
The second issue is, that HOSKY presents itself as a meme project. While I have nothing against meme coints, I believe that naming a hard fork after such a project might not be the best way to represent the Cardano ecosystem to the outside world. Even if the project itself strongly advocates for what I believe are the right values when it comes to our blockchain, and HOSKY might be known by many already in the community, external parties we are trying to onboard may see this as facetious behavior. I would rather ensure we are taken serious while having fun, instead of being seen as a joker, trying to appeal to the entire world.
- Yes152.7K ₳No rationale
- No136.5K ₳No rationale
- Abstain118.7K ₳No rationale
- No94.9K ₳No rationale
- No71.3K ₳No rationale
- Abstain49.6K ₳No rationale
- No40.5K ₳No rationale
- No26.7K ₳No rationale
- Abstain24.5K ₳No rationale
- No20.6K ₳No rationale
- Yes12K ₳No rationale
- No8.5K ₳No rationale
- No6.7K ₳No rationale
- No2.4K ₳No rationale